Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
[Python-Dev] a slightly more coherent case
Ken Manheimerklm@digicool.com
Tue, 4 Apr 2000 14:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:>gvwilson@nevex.com writes:> > 1. If P3K source is allowed to be Unicode, then all Python programming> > systems (custom-made or pre-existing) are going to have to be able> > to handle more than just 1970s-vintage 7-bit ASCII. If that support> > has to be there, it seems a shame not to make use of it in the language> > itself where that would be helpful. [1,2]> [...]> As I indicated above, I don't think the specific runes are the> problem (outside of programmer alienation). The *biggest* problem> (IMO) is that the runes are not on our keyboards. This has nothing to> do with the appropriateness of the runes to the semantic meanings> bound to them in the language definition, this has to do convenience> for typing without any regard to cultured habits in the current> programmer population.In general, it seems that there are some places where a programminglanguage implementation should not be on the leading edge, and this isone. I think we'd have to be very confident that this new division sign(or whatever) is going to be in ubiquitous use, on everyone's keyboard,etc, before we could even consider making it a necessary part of thestandard language. Do you have that confidence?Ken Manheimerklm@digicool.com
[8]ページ先頭