9.2.1. Examples

To illustrate a simple SQL function, consider the following, which might be used to debit a bank account:

CREATE FUNCTION tp1 (integer, numeric) RETURNS integer AS '    UPDATE bank         SET balance = balance - $2        WHERE accountno = $1;    SELECT 1;' LANGUAGE SQL;

A user could execute this function to debit account 17 by $100.00 as follows:

SELECT tp1(17, 100.0);

In practice one would probably like a more useful result from the function than a constant"1", so a more likely definition is

CREATE FUNCTION tp1 (integer, numeric) RETURNS numeric AS '    UPDATE bank         SET balance = balance - $2        WHERE accountno = $1;    SELECT balance FROM bank WHERE accountno = $1;' LANGUAGE SQL;

which adjusts the balance and returns the new balance.

Any collection of commands in theSQL language can be packaged together and defined as a function. The commands can include data modification (i.e.,INSERT,UPDATE, andDELETE) as well asSELECT queries. However, the final command must be aSELECT that returns whatever is specified as the function's return type. Alternatively, if you want to define a SQL function that performs actions but has no useful value to return, you can define it as returningvoid. In that case it must not end with aSELECT. For example:

CREATE FUNCTION clean_EMP () RETURNS void AS '    DELETE FROM EMP         WHERE EMP.salary <= 0;' LANGUAGE SQL;SELECT clean_EMP();

 clean_emp-----------(1 row)

9.2.2.SQL Functions on Base Types

The simplest possibleSQL function has no arguments and simply returns a base type, such asinteger:

CREATE FUNCTION one() RETURNS integer AS '    SELECT 1 as RESULT;' LANGUAGE SQL;SELECT one();

 one-----   1

Notice that we defined a column alias within the function body for the result of the function (with the nameRESULT), but this column alias is not visible outside the function. Hence, the result is labeledone instead ofRESULT.

It is almost as easy to defineSQL functions that take base types as arguments. In the example below, notice how we refer to the arguments within the function as$1 and$2:

CREATE FUNCTION add_em(integer, integer) RETURNS integer AS '    SELECT $1 + $2;' LANGUAGE SQL;SELECT add_em(1, 2) AS answer;

 answer--------      3

9.2.3.SQL Functions on Composite Types

When specifying functions with arguments of composite types, we must not only specify which argument we want (as we did above with$1 and$2) but also the attributes of that argument. For example, suppose thatEMP is a table containing employee data, and therefore also the name of the composite type of each row of the table. Here is a functiondouble_salary that computes what your salary would be if it were doubled:

CREATE FUNCTION double_salary(EMP) RETURNS integer AS '    SELECT $1.salary * 2 AS salary;' LANGUAGE SQL;SELECT name, double_salary(EMP) AS dream    FROM EMP    WHERE EMP.cubicle ~= point '(2,1)';

 name | dream------+------- Sam  |  2400

Notice the use of the syntax$1.salary to select one field of the argument row value. Also notice how the callingSELECT command uses a table name to denote the entire current row of that table as a composite value.

It is also possible to build a function that returns a composite type. This is an example of a function that returns a singleEMP row:

CREATE FUNCTION new_emp() RETURNS EMP AS '    SELECT text ''None'' AS name,        1000 AS salary,        25 AS age,        point ''(2,2)'' AS cubicle;' LANGUAGE SQL;

In this case we have specified each of the attributes with a constant value, but any computation or expression could have been substituted for these constants. Note two important things about defining the function:

• The target list order must be exactly the same as that in which the columns appear in the table associated with the composite type. (Naming the columns, as we did above, is irrelevant to the system.)

• You must typecast the expressions to match the definition of the composite type, or you will get errors like this:

  ERROR:  function declared to return emp returns varchar instead of text at column 1

A function that returns a row (composite type) can be used as a table function, as described below. It can also be called in the context of an SQL expression, but only when you extract a single attribute out of the row or pass the entire row into another function that accepts the same composite type. For example,

SELECT (new_emp()).name;

 name------ None

We need the extra parentheses to keep the parser from getting confused:

SELECT new_emp().name;ERROR:  parser: parse error at or near "."

Another option is to use functional notation for extracting an attribute. The simple way to explain this is that we can use the notationsattribute(table) andtable.attribute interchangeably:

SELECT name(new_emp());

 name------ None

---- this is the same as:--  SELECT EMP.name AS youngster FROM EMP WHERE EMP.age < 30--SELECT name(EMP) AS youngster    FROM EMP    WHERE age(EMP) < 30;

 youngster----------- Sam

Another way to use a function returning a row result is to declare a second function accepting a row type parameter, and pass the function result to it:

CREATE FUNCTION getname(emp) RETURNS text AS'SELECT $1.name;'LANGUAGE SQL;

SELECT getname(new_emp()); getname--------- None(1 row)

9.2.4.SQL Table Functions

A table function is one that may be used in theFROM clause of a query. All SQL language functions may be used in this manner, but it is particularly useful for functions returning composite types. If the function is defined to return a base type, the table function produces a one-column table. If the function is defined to return a composite type, the table function produces a column for each column of the composite type.

Here is an example:

CREATE TABLE foo (fooid int, foosubid int, fooname text);INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1,1,'Joe');INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1,2,'Ed');INSERT INTO foo VALUES(2,1,'Mary');CREATE FUNCTION getfoo(int) RETURNS foo AS '    SELECT * FROM foo WHERE fooid = $1;' LANGUAGE SQL;SELECT *, upper(fooname) FROM getfoo(1) AS t1;

 fooid | foosubid | fooname | upper-------+----------+---------+-------     1 |        1 | Joe     | JOE(2 rows)

As the example shows, we can work with the columns of the function's result just the same as if they were columns of a regular table.

Note that we only got one row out of the function. This is because we did not saySETOF.

9.2.5.SQL Functions Returning Sets

When an SQL function is declared as returningSETOFsometype, the function's finalSELECT query is executed to completion, and each row it outputs is returned as an element of the set.

This feature is normally used by calling the function as a table function. In this case each row returned by the function becomes a row of the table seen by the query. For example, assume that tablefoo has the same contents as above, and we say:

CREATE FUNCTION getfoo(int) RETURNS setof foo AS '    SELECT * FROM foo WHERE fooid = $1;' LANGUAGE SQL;SELECT * FROM getfoo(1) AS t1;

 fooid | foosubid | fooname-------+----------+---------     1 |        1 | Joe     1 |        2 | Ed(2 rows)

Currently, functions returning sets may also be called in the target list of aSELECT query. For each row that theSELECT generates by itself, the function returning set is invoked, and an output row is generated for each element of the function's result set. Note, however, that this capability is deprecated and may be removed in future releases. The following is an example function returning a set from the target list:

CREATE FUNCTION listchildren(text) RETURNS SETOF text AS'SELECT name FROM nodes WHERE parent = $1'LANGUAGE SQL;

SELECT * FROM nodes;   name    | parent-----------+-------- Top       | Child1    | Top Child2    | Top Child3    | Top SubChild1 | Child1 SubChild2 | Child1(6 rows)SELECT listchildren('Top'); listchildren-------------- Child1 Child2 Child3(3 rows)SELECT name, listchildren(name) FROM nodes;  name  | listchildren--------+-------------- Top    | Child1 Top    | Child2 Top    | Child3 Child1 | SubChild1 Child1 | SubChild2(5 rows)

In the lastSELECT, notice that no output row appears forChild2,Child3, etc. This happens becauselistchildren returns an empty set for those inputs, so no output rows are generated.