(2006-02-21) In a monoid, the associative internal operator has a neutral element.
Bourbaki calls magma a set endowed with some internal well-defined operation. (Avoid the term groupoid for this, which is now best reservedfor aconcept in category theory.)
Multiplicative notations are often used where the binary operator isunderstood between consecutive symbols representing elements. Saying that an operationis multiplicative merely stresses the use of that convention usually supplemented by the optional use of a so-called multiplicative, symbol, (like a dot, an x-shaped cross, a delta or any special ad hoc symbol) whenever a clear separation between elements is deemed typographically appropriate.
Once a particular operator is so singled out, it's called a multiplication and the qualifier multiplicative can then be used, especially todistinguish that from co-existing additive concepts.
Semigroups
If its operator is associative, a magma iscalled a semigroup. Associativity is the property which makes the use of parentheses optional:
x y z = (x y) z = x (y z)
The order of a finite semigroup is its number of elements. We count two semigroups as distinct when there's no isomorphism between them:
Number of distinct semigroups of order n. (A027851)
0
1
2
3
4
5
n = 6
n = 7
n = 8
n = 9
1
1
5
24
188
1915
28634
1627672
3684030417
105978177936292
A semigroup operator may or may not becommutative. (In a commutative semigroup, xy is the same as yx for any pair of elements x and y.)
Number of distinct commutative semigroups of order n. (A029851)
0
1
2
3
4
5
n = 6
n = 7
n = 8
n = 9
1
1
3
12
64
405
3312
44370
2209839
623492664
The numbers of distinct noncommutative semigroups are obtained from the above two tables, by termwise subtractions. Those numbers are always even because suchsemigroups come in pairs linked by an anti-isomorphism.
Number of distinct noncommutative semigroups of order n.
0
1
2
3
4
5
n = 6
n = 7
n = 8
n = 9
0
0
2
12
124
1510
25322
1583302
3681820578
105977554443628
Lone operators are often designed to be associative. In complex structures with several operators, non-associativity may emerge in a natural way:
For example, in the realm of hypercomplex numbers,the multiplication of octonions or sedenions is not associative.
A × (B × C) = (A × B) × C + B × (A × C)
Monoids :
A semigroup in which there's a neutral element e is called a monoid :
Number of commutative monoids of order n. (A058132)
0
1
2
3
4
5
n = 6
n = 7
n = 8
n = 9
0
1
2
5
19
84
509
3901
48957
2264764
The number of noncommutative monoids is obtained by subtracting the correspondingentries of the above tables. It's always an even number because such monoids come in pairs linked by an anti-isomorphism.
Number of noncommutative monoids of order n.
0
1
2
3
4
5
n = 6
n = 7
n = 8
n = 9
0
0
0
2
16
144
1728
27658
1620040
3683621866
A monoid can also be defined as acategory witha single object (the arrows of that category being the elements of the monoid).
(2006-03-04) Two flavors of invertibility, which coincide when both exist.
In a monoid, an element x is said to be right invertible if there's a right-inverse x' of x (which is to say that the product xx' is unity). It's called left invertible if there's a left-inverse x'' (such that x''x is unity).
When both inverses exist, they are necessarily equal (: Consider x''xx' ).In this case, x is said to be invertible and its (unique) inverse is denoted x-1.
(2006-02-21) A particular monoid where only the neutral element is invertible.
All the finite strings (or words) whose characters (letters or symbols)are taken from a given alphabet forma monoid under the operation of concatenation (concatenating two strings means appending the second to [the right of] the first). The concatenation of two strings called A and B is best called "Abefore B".
The empty string is the neutral element for concatenation.
This monoid is free from any relations equating distinct strings of basic symbols. Hence the name (French: monoïde libre ).
Clearly, concatenating two nonempty strings yields something other than the emptystring. The empty string is thus the only string with an inverse...
The free monoid over an alphabet of only one symbol is isomorphic to the natural integersendowed with addition (0,1,2,3...). In every other case, a free monoidis clearly not commutative.
(2013-01-02) (forpower-associative "multiplications") Raising something to the power of an integer.
Whenever some kind of associative multiplication is defined, something like x3 issimply shorthand for xxx. It's always legitimate to raisean element to the power of a positive integer that way.
x0 is always defined as equal to the neutral element, if there is one (otherwise, it's undefined). It makes no difference whether x is invertible or not (with ordinary arithmetic,zeroto the power of zero equals one).
If x is invertible, x-3 simply denotes (x-1)3. Only invertible elements can be raised to the power of a negative integer.
Empty sums, empty products, empty intersections, etc.
Raising something to the power of zero is a special case of an empty product. The result of not performing at all some well-defined associative operation dependson that operation alone: It's equal to its neutral element (whenever it has one).
An empty sum is 0 (the neutral element for addition).
An empty product is 1 (the neutral element for multiplication).
(2006-02-21) A group is a monoid in which every element is invertible.
Walthervon Dyck (1856-1934) formally defined groups in 1882:
A group is a set G on which an internal operationis defined which verifies the following properties (usingmultiplicative notations for the operator).
Closure : xG, yG, x y G (The product is well-defined.)
Associativity: xG, yG, zG, (x y) z = x (y z)
A unity element (e) exists : eG, xG, e x = xe = x
Universal Invertibility : xG, x'G, x x' = x' x = e
G is called a commutative group (or abelian group) when we also have:
Commutativity (optional) : xG, yG, x y = y x
An additive group is merely a group (usuallyabelian) where additive notationsare used: The plus sign (+) denotes the group operator.
Single-sided group properties imply double-sided ones :
The double-sidedness of two of the above group axioms need notbe postulated; it can be derived from one-sided equivalents of thoseaxioms :
There's a right-neutral element e : x, x e = x
Every element is right-invertible : x,x', x x' = e
Indeed, we may compute x' x using just those two single-sided postulates:
x' x = x' xe = x' x x' (x' )' = x'e (x' )' = x' (x' )' = e
That would show x' to be the inverse of x, if we knew that e is neutral on both sides. That fact is easy to prove, using the above as a lemma:
xG, e x = (x x' ) x = x (x' x) = xe = x
This double-sided neutrality implies that there's only one unity e . (: Assume another unity e' andconsider e e' ).
Similarly, there's only one inverse x' of x (: Let x" be anotherand consider x' x x" ). So we may safely talk about the inverse of x.
Note, finally, that (x' )' = x (: x' (x' )' =e ).
(2006-02-21) A subgroup is a group contained in another group.
A subgroup H of a group G is a subset H of G which formsa group under the group operation defined over G. H is a subgroup of G if and only if it contains theproduct of any element of H by the inverse of any other element of H. Amultiplicativesubgroup is said to be stable by division.
xH, yH, x y-1 H
When additive nomenclature and notations are used, this translatesinto the following statement, which says that a subgroup of an additive groupis merely a subset that's stable by subtraction :
xH, yH, x y H
A proper subgroup of G is a subgroup of G not equal to G itself. The trivial group {e} has no proper subgroup.
Any intersection of subgroups is a subgroup.
The centralizer in a group G of a subset E consists of all the elements of G whichcommute with every element of E. It is a subgroup of G.
The centralizer in G of G itself is thecenter of G, denoted Z(G) (it's the intersection of all centralizers in G). The center is anormal subgroup of G, butother centralizers may not be. Elements of Z(G) are called central.
(2020-01-27) A A multiplicatively absorbent subset of A is an ideal of A.
By definition: For a left-idealI,the product ax is inI whenever x is: aA,aII For a right-idealI,the product xa is inI whenever x is: aA,IaI Unless otherwise specified,an ideal is both a right-ideal and a left-ideal. Note that the empty set is an ideal of any semigroup.
Any intersection of [one-sided] ideals is a [one-sided] ideal. The intersection of all the ideals of a semigroup is called its minimal ideal. If it's nonempty, the minimal ideal M of a commutative semigroup is a group. This is to say that M has a neutral element, even if the whole semigroup doesn't.
(2006-03-09) The smallest subgroup containing E is said to be generated by E.
For any subset E of a group G, the intersectionof all subgroups of G containing E is a subgroup of G, called the subgroup generated by E.
E is said to be a set of generators of whatever subgroup it generates. A group which is generated by a finite set is said to be finitely generated.
For example, the additive group (,+) of the integers is generated by the set {1}. It's also generated by {2,3} or any other pair of coprime integers (because of Bezout's lemma). More generally, (,+) is generated by any set of coprime integers (not necessarily pairwise coprime) like {6,10,15}.
A finite group (oforder n ) which is generated by a singleelement is a cyclic group. An element of such a group which generates the whole groupis called a primitive element (or aprimitive root, with the vocabulary inherited from representingthe cyclic group of order n asthe "n-th roots of unity" in complex numbers). There are (n) different elementsin a cyclic group which are primitive ones ( being Euler'stotient function).
Themultiplicative group (+,) of positive rationals is not finitely generated. It's generated by the prime numbers {2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19...}.
(2016-05-29) Describing a group using the relations obeyed by its generators.
A finitely-generated group can be described by naming a set ofgenerators andstating the nontrivial relations they obey (the relators). Those relators are normally given by expressions which are equalto the neutral element (minimally so) but explicit equations are also commonly used.
A free group has no relators. The simplest free group is isomorphic to the additive group of the integers (,+) and has thefollowing multiplicative presentation, which names a single generatorand states no relators:
<a | >
Less trivially, the octic groupD4 could be presented as follows:
< r,s | r 4,s 2,srsr > or < r,s | r 4 =s 2 =srsr = 1 >
Do not confuse such presentations with (linear) representations.
(2006-03-02) The order of a subgroup divides the order of the group.
By definition, the order |G| of a finite group G is its number of elements. (The order of an element x is the order of the subgroupgenerated by {x}.)
Cosets :
In a group G, the left-coset of an element x, with respect tothe subgroup H, is the subset x H of G (consisting of all products x h where h is an element of H). Similarly, the right-coset is H x.
Index of a Subgroup :
Twoleft-cosets with respect to Hare either disjoint or identical and they havethe same cardinality as H (i.e., the same number of elements if finite). Whenever it's finite,the number of left-cosets with respect to H is equal to the number ofright-cosets. It's denoted [G:H] and is called the index of H in G.
Lagrange's Theorem :
In the case of a finite group G, the fact that such left-cosets form a partition of G shows that the order of the subgroup H divides evenlythe order of G.
This result is known as Lagrange's Theorem. It's now presented as one of the most basic results of Group Theory, named in honor of Joseph-LouisLagrange (1736-1813),who made a related remark in 1777. The general result was probably known to Cauchy (1789-1857) but it was only formally proved in 1861, by Camille Jordan (1838-1922; X1855).
Commensurability :
Two subgroups are said to becommensurable when theindex of theirintersection is finite in each of them. The qualifier is inherited from ancient Greek mathematics,where two real numbers are calledcommensurable when they are proportional totwo integers. The two additive groupsgeneratedby two such numbers are indeedcommensurable in the above sense(their intersection is the additive group generated by the lowest common multiple of the two numbers).
(2020-05-19) , 1845) If aprime number p divides |G|, then some element of G has order p.
The commutative case can be used as a lemma to prove Cauchy's theoremand also its generalization by Sylow (Sylow's first theorem, 1872).
Proof : Let G be an abelian group G whose order is a multiple of the prime p: |G| = n = m×p.First, we see that the proposition is true if G iscyclic, generated by element a (since the element am is then of order p).
Otherwise, we proceed by induction on m, starting with the case m = 1 which makes p the order of G. This is trivial because, by Lagrange's theorem, the order of an element must divide the order of the group and canthus only be 1 or p. In other words, any element of G besides identity is a satisfactoryelement of order p (which establishes also that G is cyclic).
For m ≥ 2, consider an element h of G, besides identity. Let H be the nontrivial subgroup generated by h. H is anormal subgroup (as is any subgroup in the abelian case). Both H and G/H are nontrivial group of order strictly less than n (because we've already disposed of the cases where G is cyclic). Since the product of their orders (respectively |G| and [G:H]) equals n = m×p, at least one of them is divisible by p. In either case, the induction hypothesis implies that the corresponding groupcontains an element of order p. Either way, we can use that to obtainan element of order p in G, as follows:
If H contains an element x of order p, then x is also in G and we're done.
If G/H contains an element y of order p, then y is the class xH of someelement x of G. For any integer k, the class of xk is yk.So, the order of x is the same as the order of y, namely p.
This concludes the proof that Cauchy's theorem holds for abelian groups.
Proof for non-abelian groups :
(2020-05-19) On the number of subgroups of given order in a finite group G,
For a prime p, a p-group is a group where theorderof any element is a power of p. If it's a subgroup of G, it's called a p-subgroup of G.
In a finite group G, a Sylow p-subgroup (abbreviated p-SSG) is a maximal p-subgroup of G. The set of all p-SSG is denoted Sylp (G). Remarkably, all of those are isomorphic to each other.
Sylow's First Theorem :
Sylow's Second Theorem :
Sylow's Third Theorem :
(2006-03-02) The left and rightcosets withrespect to anormal subgroup are identical.
The concept of a normal subgroup is due to Evariste Galois (1832).
Asubgroup H is normal when aH = Ha for anya. Such a subgroup is also called invariant or distinguished (French: sous-groupe distingué ).
To a normal subgroup H corresponds an equivalence relation amongelements of G defined by calling x and y equivalent when xy-1 is in H (in other words,when x and y have the same left cosets with respect to H).
The equivalence classes so definedform a group denoted G/H andcalled the quotient of H in G (or of G by H) also dubbed "G modulo H".
Although the above equivalence relation is defined for anysubgroup H, the equivalence classes form a group only when H is normal.
Examples of Normal Subgroups :
Any group G is a normal subgroup of itself (the only non-proper one).
The trivial group {e} is a normal subgroup ofany group G whose neutral element is e. (It's a proper subgroup of any such G but itself.)
The center Z(G) of a group G consists of all the elementswhich commute with every element G. A member of Z(G) is called a central element. A noncentral element is an element whichdoesn't commute with at least one other element. The center is anormal subgroup. So is any subgroup of the center (in particular, any subgroup of an abelian group is normal).
If f is ahomomorphismor anantihomomorphismfrom group G, then thekernelof f (ker f ) is a normal subgroup of G. More generally,so is the inverse image (pre-image) of any normal subgroup of f (G). For a normal subgroup H of G, the direct image f (H) is a normal subgroup of f (G).
For any subset E of the group G, the subgroupgenerated byall theconjugates of the elements of E is called conjugate closure of E. It's anormal subgroup containing E. In fact, it's the smallest normal subgroup containing E (i.e, it's the intersectionof all normal subgroups containing E). It's thus alsoknown as the normal closure of E.
Any Subgroup is a Normal Subgroup of its Normalizer :
The normalizer of a subgroup H consists of all elements x of the group G for which x H = H x (in particular all elements of H belong to its normalizer). The normalizer of H is asubgroup of G. By definition, H is a normal subgroup of its normalizer (H need not be a normal subgroup of the whole group G).
(2019-04-13) Notations for [proper] normal subgroups (or ideals).
Two conventions are floating around to distinguish between a standard (reflexive) ordering relation and its strict (antireflexive) counterpart:
The highlighted entries may be ambiguous. I don't recommend the grey ones.
The above notations for normal subgroups were introduced by Helmut Wielandt around 1960. They are now also used to denote ideals in ring theory (since an ideal is to a ring what a normal subgroup is to a group).
(2006-04-05) Functions for which the image of a product is a product of the images.
An homomorphism is a map (orfunction) which preserves some specific algebraic operation(s). A group homomorphism is thus a map f from a [multiplicative]group G into another group H, which is such that:
xG, yG, f(x y) = f (x)f (y)
If f issurjective ("onto" H) it's called an epihomomorphism (or "homomorphism onto"). If it'sinjective ("one-to-one") it's called an monomorphism.If it'sbijective ("one-to-one onto") it's an isomorphism.
An homomorphism from G to itself is called an endomorphism of G. A bijective endomorphism is called an automorphism.
The automorphisms of a group G form a group, denoted Aut(G).
Anti-homomorphisms :
An anti-homomorphism, with respect to amultiplicative operator, is a function f which reverses the order of that multiplication :
xG, yG, f (x y) = f (y)f (x)
In any group, inversion is an example of an anti-homomorphism:
( x y ) -1 = y -1 x -1
The concepts defined above for homomorphisms have their counterparts for anti-homomorphisms: Anti-epihomomorphism, anti-monomomorphism, anti-isomorphism, anti-endomorphism and anti-automorphism.
Kernel (French: noyau )
For a homomorphism (or an anti-homomorphism) f fromgroup G to a group of identity e, the kernel of f is a normal subgroup of G defined by
ker f = { xG | f (x) = e }
(The homomorphicpre-imageof any normal subgroup is normal.)
(2006-03-05) (Gersonides, 1321) The group of thepermutations of E (bijections of the set E onto itself).
A permutation of E is a one-to-one correspondence(bijection) of E onto itself. The term is most commonly used when E is finite,but it's also acceptable when E is infinite (possiblyuncountably so).
In the finite case, the symmetric group of degree n is denoted Sn. Its order is the number of permutations of n elements,namely n! ("nfactorial").
Log g(n) (n Log n)½
Even permutationsform the alternating groupAn (whose order is n!/2 ). It's thederived subgroup of the symmetric group: An = S'n
Notations for small permutations :
One standard way to record computations in the realm of very small finite groups is to use a string of different characters (digits or letters) to denote the permutation which transforms the sorted elements in the top row intothe matching elements of the bottom row. Both row are placed between parentheses. Juxtaposition of two such notation indicates the composition of the functions so denoted, with the usual convention that the rightmostfunction is to be applied first (composition isn't commutative):
fg
gf
1234 1243
1234 1324
=
1234 1423
1234 1324
1234 1243
=
1234 1342
Cycle decomposition of a permutations :
A cyclic permutation of n elements is denoted by a sequencebetween parentheses. The image of an element is the element to its right (the last element is mapped back to the first one). There are n equivalent ways to denote such a permutation, since there's a free choice ofwhich element is written first in the list. Equivalent notations are equated:
(1 4 5 3 2) = (4 5 3 2 1)
A cycle is a permutation of n elements which is a cyclic permutation of m of those elements (m ≤ n) which leaves the others unchanged. Two or more cycles are said to be disjoint when operate on different elements (each cycle applies only to elements which are leftunchanged by the others). Any permutation can be decomposed as a composition of disjoint cycles in a unique way (up to the order of those cycles, which is irrelevant since disjoint cycles commute). Our previous example entail cycles which do not commute because they're not disjoints. namely:
(3 4) (2 3) = (2 4 3) (2 3) (3 4) = (2 3 4)
A cycle of order 2 (a 2-cycle) is called a switch ora transposition. It's useful to know that the signature of a cycle of order n is (-1)n+1.
Cayley's Group Theorem (1878) :
Arthur Cayley (1821-1895)observed that a group G is always isomorphic to a subgroup of Sym(G).
Proof : In themultiplicative group G, we associate to an element a the bijection T(a) which sends an element x to ax . T is an injectivehomomorphism (i.e., a monomorphism) from G to Sym(G), which is called the regular representation of G.
T(a) T(b) = T(a b)
So, any finite group of order n is isomorphic to asubgroup of Sn .
(2006-03-02) Aninner automorphism is aconjugation by a given element of G.
To any element a of G is associateda special type ofautomorphism,called an inner automorphism (French: automorphisme intérieur ) defined as follows ( fa is called conjugation by a ).
x, fa(x) = a xa-1 [ Note that fafb = fab ]
Under function composition, inner automorphisms formanormal subgroup (see proof later in this section) denoted Inn(G), of the group of the automorphisms on G, denoted Aut(G) (itself a subgroup of Sym(G),thesymmetric group on G). Conjugation by a is the identity function just if a belongsto thecenter of G. Consequently:
Note that a subgroup H of G which is mapped onto itself by any inner automorphismis a normal subgroup (alsocalled invariant subgroup).
More generally, two subgroups of G are said to be conjugates of each other when there is an inner isomorphism between them.
The above claim that Inn(G) is a normal subgroup of Aut(G) is established by showing thatconjugation by any automorphism g of an innerautomorphism (conjugation by a) yields another inner automorphism. That can be proved in a single line:
x, gfa g-1 (x) = g (a g-1(x)a-1) = g(a) x g(a)-1 = fg(a)(x)
(2006-03-02) The members of Out(G) are classes of automorphisms of G.
A group G is said to be centerless when itscenter istrivial, which is to saythat only the identity element commutes with every element.
A complete group is a centerless group whose only automorphisms are theinner ones. (Equivalently, it's a group whose center and outer automorphism group are trivial.)
If a group G is complete, it's isomorphic to Aut(G) (itsautomorphisms). However, the converse need not be true (one counterexample isD4 ).
(2020-09-14) Variously named after Cauchy (1845), Frobenius (1887) or Burnside...
(2006-03-20) The conjugacy classes of a group G form apartition of G.
Two elements x and y of a group G are said to be conjugates when there's aninner automorphism from one to the other,that is, when there's an element a of G such that ax = ya.
So defined, conjugacy is an equivalence relation (it's reflexive, symmetric and transitive).The conjugacy class of an element x is the set ofall elements of G which are conjugate to it. Every element is in one and only one of those classes (equivalence classes always form such a partition).
If x is in thecenter of G, denoted Z(G), then the conjugacy class of x is simply {x} (a set of only one element). More generally, we would establish that the number of elements that are conjugateto x is equal to theindex in G of thecentralizer C of {x}. That number is usually denoted [ G : C ].
Tallying the conjugacy classes with more than one element by assigning eacha different index i, we obtain the so-called conjugacy class formula :
| G | = | Z(G) | + i [ G : Ci]
The second term is an empty sum (equal to zero) when G is commutative.
(2006-03-05) A group is simple when it has just twonormal subgroups.
{e} and G are trivially always normalsubgroups of G. The group G is said to be simple when itsonly normal subgroups are those two.
(2006-03-06) G', G(1) or [G,G] is the subgroup of Ggenerated by its commutators.
The commutator [x,y] of two elements of themultiplicative group G is:
[x,y] = x y x-1 y-1 = x y (y x)-1
The set of all commutators isn't necessarily a subgroup. What's called the derived subgroup (orcommutator subgroup) is the subgroup theygenerate (i.e., the smallest subgroup which includes all commutators).
The derived subgroup of a group is anormal subgroup, as the following identity demonstrates (since the set of commutators is thus shownto be stable under anyinner automorphism,so is the subgroup theygenerate).
a [x,y]a-1 = [axa-1,aya-1 ]
G' is also the smallest normal subgroupof G whose quotient group in G is abelian (i.e.,commutative). The group G/G' is known as the abelianization of G (it's the largest abelian quotient in G).
Examples of Derived Subgroups :
The derived subgroup of any abelian group is the trivial subgroup.
The derived subgroup of thesymmetric groupSn is the alternating groupAn. The derived subgroup of the alternating group is itself: A'n = An.
It's the sequence where the n+1 st term is the derived subgroup of the n-th one (starting with the whole group when n = 0).
(2006-03-21) The group made from the independent juxtaposition of several groups.
The direct product of two groups G and H is thegroup obtained by using for the cartesian product G H independent operations on the components:
(g,h) (g',h') = ( g h , g'h' )
The term direct sum is used for the same concept withadditive notations:
(g,h) + (g',h') = ( g+h , g'+h' )
Similar rules can be used for cartesian products of any number of monoids.
Extensions to infinitely many components :
The concept extends naturally to direct sums (or direct products ) of infinitely many monoids. Such direct sums are usually understood to be finitely restricted (by considering just the elements having only a finite number of componentsthat differ from the relevant neutral element).
For example, thefundamental theorem of arithmeticprovides a standard isomorphism between the multiplicative monoid of the positive integersand the finitely restricted direct sum of infinitely many copies of the nonnegativeintegers (each such copy being associated with a prime number). Using standard notations,this can be expressed as:
(*, ) = (
()
, + )
Note that the set appearing in the right-hand-side of the above is countable,because of the parenthesized exponent which indicates a finite restriction in theabove sense. A lack of parentheses around the exponent would denoteanuncountable setwhich is rarely investigated, if ever (that beast includes elements idenfified with products of infinitely manycoprime integers).
For what n are there one million abelian groups of order n ?
By trying only the first 61, we see that the only partition numbers which divide 1000000 are p(1) = 1, p(2) = 2 and p(4) = 5. Therefore, there are exactly 1000000 distinct abelian groups of order n if and only if the factorization of n consists of:
6 primes of multiplicitity 4.
6 primes of multiplicitity 2.
Any number of primes of multiplicitity 1 (possibly none).
If f is a homomorphism from a group H to Aut(G), the semi-direct product of G and H with respect to f is the group denoted G f H consisting ofthecartesian product G H with the multiplication :
(x,a) (y,b) = ( xf (a) (y) , ab )
When f is the trivial homomorphism (i.e., f (a) is the identity of G for any a) this semi-direct product is just the direct product of G and H.
Holomorph :
When H is equal to Aut(G) we may use the identity of Aut(G) as the homorphism f appearing in the above definition and define the holomorph Hol(G) as the semi-direct product of G and Aut(G) in which :
(x,a) (y,b) = ( xa(y) , ab )
(2006-03-05) Groups of small orders and their families...
Additive notations (using the symbol "+" for the operator) are often used for commutative groups (abelian groups). Groups isomorphic to the group Cn = (/n, +) of residuesmodulo n arecalled cyclic groups.
The smallest noncyclic groups are thus of order 4 and 6. The Klein group is the noncyclic group of order 4. The smallest noncommutative group is the following group S3 = D3 (the 6 symmetries of an equilateral triangle).
Klein Group
+
0
1
2
3
0
0
1
2
3
1
1
0
3
2
2
2
3
0
1
3
3
2
1
0
Dihedral Group D3
A
B
C
D
E
F
A
A
B
C
D
E
F
B
B
C
A
E
F
D
C
C
A
B
F
D
E
D
D
F
E
A
C
B
E
E
D
F
B
A
C
F
F
E
D
C
B
A
The Klein Group (V) is isomorphic to the direct sumC2C2 Felix Klein called it Vierergruppe in 1884.
The dihedral groupDn consists of the 2n symmetries of a regular n-gon (n rotations, nflips).
There are 5 groups of order 8. Three are abelian : C8 and the twodirect sumsC2+C4 and C2+C2+C2 (the additive group of thefield of order 8). The other two groups of order 8 are noncommutative, namely the dihedral groupD4 (thesymmetries of a square)and the quaternion groupQ8 :
(2006-03-05)
i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = i j k = -1
Quaternion GroupQ8
1
i
j
k
-1
-i
-j
-k
1
1
i
j
k
-1
-i
-j
-k
i
i
-1
k
-j
-i
1
-k
j
j
j
-k
-1
i
-j
k
1
-i
k
k
j
-i
-1
-k
-j
i
1
-1
-1
-i
-j
-k
1
i
j
k
-i
-i
1
-k
j
i
-1
k
-j
-j
-j
k
1
-i
j
-k
-1
i
-k
-k
-j
i
1
k
j
-i
-1
Red (i) and Blue (j) generators ofQ8
The real line combined with an oriented 3-dimensional Euclidean space of orthonormal basis (i,j,k) forms the quaternions, a 4-dimensional normed division algebra similar to 2-dimensional complex numbers, except multiplicationis not commutative:
(a,A) + (b,B)
=
(a+b ,A+B )
(a,A) (b,B)
=
(ab -A.B , aB +bA +AB )
This is how the 3-dimensional "dot product" and "cross product"were invented,well before the generalized idea of avectorbecame commonplace.
The above quaternionic units can be used to build a Dirac operator D (yielding the opposite of the Laplacian when applied twice):
D = i x + j y + k z
The Laplacian remains the same in two systems of coordinates (a.ka.reference frames)obtained from each other by rigid rotation.
(2023-03-10) The law for multiplication in thealgebra generatedby the Dirac matrices.
The multiplicative group generated by the four gamma matrices a,b,c,d is of order 32. It consists of 16 disjoint pairs of elements which are (additive) opposites of each other. With one element of each such pairs, we form a basis for thealgebra of dimension 16 generated by the 4 gamma matrices.
The group clearly contains the identity matrix of dimension four (I) and the product e = abcd. Introducing e allows every element of the group to be uniquely representedby a sign (+ 1 or -1) along with a signed product of at most two factors among the five elementary elementsa,b,c,d,e. Withzero such factors, we have 2 elements (+I and -I), with one factor we have 10 elements (a,b,c,d,e and their opposites) and with 2 distinct factors,we obtain 20 = 2×C (5,2) elements. The grand total is indeed 32.
Among the 32 elements of the gamma group, we find:
1 element of order 1, namely I.
15 elements of order 2: -I, a, -a, ab, -ab, ac, -ac, ad, -ad, ae, -ae.
20 elements of order 4, whose square is -I.
Products of gamma matrices : a =0 b =1 c =2 d =3 (with e = abcd)
0
Grade 1
Grade 2 (bivectors)
Grade 3
4
I
a
b
c
d
ab
ac
ad
bc
bd
cd
ae
be
ce
de
e
a
I
ab
ac
ad
b
c
d
de
-ce
be
e
cd
-bd
bc
ae
b
-ab
-I
bc
bd
a
-de
ce
-c
-d
ae
-cd
-e
-ad
ac
be
c
-ac
-bc
-I
cd
de
a
-be
b
-ae
-d
bd
ad
-e
-ab
ce
d
-ad
-bd
-cd
-I
-ce
be
a
ae
b
c
-bc
-ac
ab
-e
de
ab
-b
-a
de
-ce
I
-bc
-bd
-ac
-ad
e
-be
-ae
-d
c
cd
ac
-c
-de
-a
be
bc
I
-cd
ab
-e
-ad
-ce
d
-ae
-b
-bd
ad
-d
ce
-be
-a
bd
cd
I
e
ab
ac
-de
-c
b
-ae
bc
bc
de
c
-b
ae
ac
-ab
e
-I
cd
-bd
-d
ce
-be
-a
-ad
bd
-ce
d
-ae
-b
ad
-e
-ab
-cd
-I
bc
c
de
a
-be
ac
cd
be
ae
d
-c
e
ad
-ac
bd
-bc
-I
-b
-a
de
-ce
-ab
ae
-e
-cd
bd
-bc
be
ce
de
-d
c
-b
I
ab
ac
ad
-a
be
cd
e
ad
-ac
ae
d
-c
-ce
-de
-a
-ab
-I
bc
bd
-b
ce
-bd
-ad
e
ab
-d
ae
b
be
a
-de
-ac
-bc
-I
cd
-c
de
bc
ac
-ab
e
c
-b
ae
-a
be
ce
-ad
-bd
-cd
-I
-d
e
-ae
-be
-ce
-de
cd
-bd
bc
-ad
ac
-ab
a
b
c
d
-I
This algebra of dimension 16 is known as the spacetime algebra Cl (1,3) which is just the Clifford algebra of dimension 4 with Minkowski metric.
Pseudoscalars (Grade 4) commute only with scalars or bivectors (Grade 2). The bivectors and the scalars form the centralizer of the pseudoscalars.
The above table doesn't depend on Dirac's representation of a,b,c,d in terms of 4×4 matrices. It can be entirely constructed from the pairwise anticommutativity of a,b,c,d and the following relations. Therefore, an isomorphic group is entirely specified by a choice of a basis of four mutually anticommutative elements verifying these:
a2 = I , b2 = c2 = d2 = -I and the definition e = abcd
The last relation implies that e2 = -I and also that e anticommutes with the other four. Thus, a is special (it's the only single-letter element which squares to unity) but b,c,d,e are placed on an equal footing.
Here's one remarkable identity:
det ( ta + xb + yc + zd + ue) = ( t 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 u 2) 2
Enumeratimg the automorphisms of Dirac's gamma group :
Let f be an automorphism. f (a) must be of order 2 and is therefore, up to a change of sign, an element of {a,ab,ac,ad,ae}. For the three distinct images of b,c,d to anticommute with f (a) and with each other, they must belong to {b,c,d,e} up to sign. Conversely, if those conditions are met, the images of a,b,c,d generate the whole group, as the above table can be constructed usingonly the rules for combining single letters. Thus, we have 5 choicesfor f (a) and 4×3×2 choices for the other three letters, knowing that we may then pick any choice of four signs among 16 possibilities. Therefore:
Dirac's Gamma group has 5! 24 = 120 × 16 = 1920 automorphisms.
(2014-12-17) The octic group is represented by the eight symmetries of a square.
This is a centerless group G isomorphic to Aut(G) but not to Inn(G). A nice example of an incomplete group isomorphic to its automorphisms.
The dihedral group D4 can be represented as the group of the 8 symmetries of a square, with vertices numbered clockwise 1,2,3,4. It'sgenerated by :
A = e B = r C = r2 D = r3 E = s F = s r = r3 s G = s r2 = r2 s H = s r3 = r s
A is the identity.
C is the half-turn.
B and D are quarter-turns.
E and G are diagonal flips.
F and H are side flips.
Swapping an even number of the above pairsyields one of the inner automorphisms tabulated at right.
The 4 inner automorphisms  are allevenpermutations :
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
fA = fC
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
fB =fD
A
B
C
D
G
H
E
F
fE =fG
A
D
C
B
E
H
G
F
fF =fH
A
D
C
B
G
F
E
H
If there was an automorphism swapping an odd number of the threepairs (B,D), (E,G) and (F,H) thenwe could combine it with one of the four inner automorphisms toobtain some automorphism f leaving (A,B,C,D) invariant andswapping either (E,G) or (F,H). Neither is possible, since:
If f only swaps E and G, then f (B) f (F) = B F = E f (B F) = G
If f only swaps F and H, then f (B) f (E) = B E = H f (B E) = F
Therefore, any other automorphism must involve sending at leastone element of the three aforementioned pairs to an element of another.
Any automorphism must leave invariant A (the identity) and C (the only other element with a square root). Likewise, the order-4 elements, B and D, must be invariant or transform into each other.
Aut (D4 ) , the group of automorphisms of D4 , is isomorphic to D4.
(2006-05-09) The number g(n) of different groups of order n (up to isomorphism).
If the integer n iscoprime with itsEuler totient (n), then there's only one group of order n (the cyclic group). This applies to the following values of n: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 33, 35, 37, 41, 43, 47, 51...(A003277). This result is attributed toWilliamBurnside (1852-1927) and those numbers are known as cyclic numbers.
For noncyclic orders (A060679) here's the number of distinct groups:
g(n) = 2 if n is either the square of a prime or a squarefree number with only one of its prime factors congruent to 1 modulo another (A054395). The following table gives, for each m, the numbers n for which g(n) = m.
Numbers n for which there areprecisely m groups of order n
The classification of noncommutative finite simple groups is much tougher... Arguably, the final classification effort started with the 1963 publication ofa 255-page proof of the Odd Order Theorem (or Feit-Thompson theorem) which implies that all noncommutative simple finite groups are of even order:
Solvability of Groups of Odd Order by JohnG. Thompson (1932-) and Walter Feit(1930-2004). Pacific Journal of Mathematics13 (1963) 775-1029.
The classification was declared complete in 1982, despite pending gaps... This was the result of a tremendous collective effort, spanning decades. A key figure in this accomplishment wasDanielGorenstein (1923-1992).
The Classification Theorem :
Unless it's one of the 27 sporadic groups presentedbelow (including the Tits Group, often dubiously tallied with twisted Chevalley groups) a finite simple group must belong to one of the following 18 countable families:
16 types of Chevalley groups, listed below, eachuniformly described in terms of a finite field of order q (q being the power of a prime). For example, the first such type consists of the projective group of square matrices of dimension n+1 with coefficients in Fq :
An(q) = PSL (n+1,Fq)
Simple Chevalley Groups ( u v denotes the GCD of u and v)
Chevalley groups are named after ClaudeChevalley (1909-1984) who was the youngest founder of theBourbaki group in 1935.
In 1955, Chevalley found a uniform way to describe Lie groups over arbitrary fields. With finite fields, this led to what J.H. Conway (1937-2020) and others have called untwisted Chevalley groups (they're listed first in the above table, with unsuperscripted symbols).
The twisted Chevalley groups (denoted by superscripted symbols) resultfrom two modifications of Chevalley's approach. One was proposed in 1959 by Robert Steinberg (1922-2014). Theother (1960-1961)is due to Michio Suzuki (1926-1998) and Rimhak Ree (1922-2005).
The above highlighted entry 2F4(2 2m+1) is simple only for positive values of m. For m=0, this group is not simple but it has a simple normal subgroupofindex 2 and order 17971200 (itsderived subgroup) which is known as the Tits Group, and is best classified among sporadic groups.
(2006-03-06) Noncommutative non-alternating finite simple groups not ofLie type.
20 of these are related to the largest and most famous of them all, the Fischer-Griess Monster. Six other sporadic groups ( highlighted )unrelated to the Monster are known as oddments or pariahs.
The 27th sporadic group is, arguably, theaforementionedTits Group.
The Mathieu group M21 doesn't belong to the above list. It's simple but can't be considered sporadic because it's isomorphic to PSL(3,4):
M21 = PSL(3,4) = PSL(3,F4) = A2(4)
The Fischer-Griess Monster Group is also known as Fischer's Monster orthe Monster Group. It was predicted independently by Bernd Fischer and Robert L. Griess in 1973. At first, Griess dubbed it the Friendly Giant and constructed it explicitely in1981,as the automorphism group of a 196883-dimensional commutative nonassociativealgebra over the rational numbers.
The Leech Lattice isthe densest packing of 24-dimensional hyperspheres (each touches 196560 others). Its automorphisms featureacenter of order two. Modulo that center, they formthe Conway Group (Co1).
Simon P. Norton gave a construction of the group proposed byKoichiroHarada (now called the Harada-Norton group). Norton also proposed the monstruous moonshineconjecture with his advisor,John H. Conway.
The Higman-Sims Group (HS) is named after Donald G. Higman and Charles C. Sims,who described it jointly in 1968. It's a subgroup ofindex 2in the group of automorphisms of the Higman-Sims graph (the strongly-regular graph with 100 nodes of degree 22, where adjacent nodeshave no common neighbors and nonadjacent nodes have 6 common neighbors).
The Hall-Janko Group (HJ) is named after Marshall Hall,Jr. (1910-1990) and Zvonimir Janko (1932-). It's a subgroup ofindex 2in the automorphisms of the Hall-Wales graph constructed in 1968 by David Wales, as the strongly-regular graph with 100 nodes of degree 36, where adjacent nodes have 14 common neighborsand nonadjacent nodes have 12 (also calledHall-Janko graph).
The modern quest for a complete list of sporadic groups was launched bythe discovery of the first of theJanko Groups (J1) by Zvonimir Janko, in 1965.
The first sporadic groups (M11 , M12, M22,M23, M24) are subgroups of M24 discovered between 1860 and 1873byEmile Mathieu (1835-1890; X1854). Georg Frobenius (1849-1917) proved M12 to besimple in 1904.
(2017-08-02) T is the set of all elements of G which have a finite order.
An element of finite order is called a torsion element. If the identity is the only such element, the group G is said to be torsion-free.
A torsion element whose order divides k is called a k-torsion.
On the other hand, a torsion group (also called a periodic group) is a group consisting only of torsion elements (which is to say that all elements have finite orders). All finite groups are periodic (i.e., Tor(G) = G). If the orders of the elements in a periodic group are bounded, then they have a least common multiple n and the groupis said to be of exponent n.
One example of an infinite finitely-generated torsion group was given in 1964, by Evgeny Golod (1935-2018) and Igor Shafarevich (1923-2017).
(2015-05-03) Homomorphisms from G into a group of matrices.
GL(n,K) is the group of invertible n by n matrices with entriesin afieldK.
All finite groups are linear. Compact groups... Lie groups... Faithful representations (isomorphisms). Irreducible representations do not allow any nontrivialproper invariant subspace.
(2023-04-04) Groups which are also smooth manifolds (locally Euclidean).
The tangent space to a Lie group is a Lie algebra. The converse is true in finitely many dimensions but there are Lie algebras with infinitelymany dimensions which cannot be realized as the tangent space to a Lie group. The earliest counterexample is due to the bourbakistAdrien Douady (1935-2006).
(2006-03-01) (multiplicative subgroups ofmatrices) Groups of transformations depending on parameters in a field.
Theclassical groups tabulated below are subgroups of the group GL(n,K) of invertible n by n matrices with entries in thefieldK.
When K isn't specifed, the fieldof real numbers (R) is understood, except thatthe field of complex numbers (C) underlies the groups denoted U(n) and SU(n) (note, however, that the "dimension"listed is always thereal dimension, which is twice thecomplexdimension whenever applicable).
A subgroup of GL(n,K) is called a linear representation (or simply a representation) of any group it happens to beisomorphic to.
A* denotes the adjoint of the squarematrix A (namely, the "conjugate transpose"of a complex matrix, or simply the transpose of areal matrix).
A matrix is said to be unimodular if its determinant is 1. In the symbol of a group, the letter "S" (for special)says that its elements are unimodular.
Projective special linear group. PSL(n,C) = SL(n,C) /SZ(n,C)
Alternate Notations :
A notation like GL(Kn) may also be used instead of GL(n,K). This has the great advantage of being consistentwith more general symbols like GL(V) which apply to avector spaceV whose dimension may be infinite.
On the other hand, when afinite field is used,GL(n,GF(q)) may be denoted GL(n,q). A similar convention holds for all the symbols tabulated above. For example,the first type ofChevalley groups is PSL(n,q) = An(q).
Some Special Cases :
The simplest unitary group is the "unit circle" or circle group (denotedT) which is isomorphic to U(1), SO(2) and / .
SZ(n,C) is thecyclic group of order n (it does "look" cyclic).
The Möbius Group is isomorphic to PGL(2,C) and/or PSL(2,C).
With K =(or) the aboveclassical groups are examples of Lie groups.
(2016-05-21) Linear group modulo the scalar group or any group modulo itscenter.
Traditionally,the projective group is the quotient of the general linear group (i.e., the group of all squarematricesof a given dimension over a givenfield) modulo the scalar group (i.e., the diagonal matrices).
The term is also used as a qualifier to denote the quotientsnodulo the scalar group of some subgroups of the general linear group.
By extension, the qualifier projective can even beused to denote the quotient of any group modulo its owncenter. (See modular group.)
(2006-04-12) The automorphisms of the Riemann Sphere (the projective line).
An homographic transformation f (also called a Möbius transformation or a fractional linear transformation) sends acomplex number z to:
f (z) =
a z + b
c z + d
It's a [bijective] transformation of the projective line (the complex plane plus a single "infinity"point beyond its horizon, so to speak). The image of is a/c (or if c = 0 ). The image of -d/c (or if c = 0 ) is .
The Stereographic Projection
Projective Line
Riemann Sphere
(a,b,c) 3 | a 2 +b 2 +c 2 = 1
(0,0,1)
z =
a + i b
1c
(a,b,c) c 1
z = u +iv
2 u
,
2 v
,
| z | 2 1
| z | 2+ 1
| z | 2+ 1
| z | 2+ 1
Automorphic functions (originally dubbed "Fuchsian functions" by Poincaré,around 1884) are meromorphic functions (i.e., ratios of two holomorphic functions; analytic functions of a complex variable) whichare invariant under a countable infinity ofMöbius transformations).
(2016-05-22) The common name of the projective special linear group PSL(2,).
The locution gamma group is best reserved for something else.
The modular group consists of all 2 by 2 squarematriceswith integer elements (in) and unitdeterminant (that's what special means) when considered modulo the center {I,-I} (that's what projective means).
The modular group was first studied in detail, for its own sake,by Richard Dedekind and Felix Klein as part of the Erlangen program (1872). The closely related elliptic functions (introduced by Lagrange in 1785) had already been studied quite extensively by Abel(1827-1828) and Jacobi(1829) who shared the grand prix of the French Academy of Sciences for that work, in 1830 (after Abel's death).
An interesting source of examples in the modular group is provided bythe successiveconvergents obtained bytruncating the continued fraction expansion of a number, because thefollowing relation is naturally satisfied:
Pn+1 Qn Qn+1 Pn = (-1)n
(2017-07-29) Group operator defined on a cubicplanar curve without singular points.
In the Euclidean plane, a cubic curve without singular points is called an elliptic curve. That same term is also commonly used to denote the cartesianequation of such a curve or the wonderful group structure its points can be endowed with, as described below. Elliptic curves can be considered over various fields (complex numbers, rationals,p-adic numbers, finite fields).
Mordell's Theorem (1922) :
In 1901, Poincaré had askedwhether the rational points of a curve of genus 1 are finitely generated. 21 years later,Mordell settled thatfor elliptic curves:
An elliptic-curve's rational points form a finitely-generated abelian group.
For an elliptic curve E, this is denoted E()
(2017-08-03) Combining a circle and a straight line so the latter is a subgroup.
In the Euclidean plane, let's apply the geometric definition of sums on an elliptic curve to the degenerate cubic consisting of a circle of unit diameter and a straight line at a distance d from its center.
When at least one point is on the circle, the geometric construction of thesum of two points presents no difficulty. On the other hand, if both of the points A and B are on the line, their sum C = A+B is not immediately clear. To construct it, we may consider any auxiliary point V on the circle and use the followingidentity, involving three sums of the previous kind:
A + B = ( (A+V) + B) - V
For convenience, we choose V on the axis of symmetry of the figure, so that V = -V, in which case we have a symmetrical defining relation:
A + B = (A+V) + (B+V)
If A' is the mirror-image of A+V (with respect to the horizontal axis of symmetry) then the law introduced in the non-degenerate case says that A' is at the intersection of the circle and the AV line. Likewise, the image B' of B+V is the intersection of BV with the circle. A+B is on the mirror-image of the line joining A+V and B+V, which is the line A'B'. So, A+B is at the intersection of A'B' with our basic vertical line, as shown in the figure at left.
w =
u + v
1 + k uv
If we're concerned with number theory, we choose any rational value for k. Otherwise, we remark that the above equation encodes a group structure on the real linein one of three different ways, modulo some rescaling:
k = 0. Ordinary addition.
k = -1. Addition of trigonometric tangents.
k = 1 / c2. Addition of hyperbolic tangents (relativistic rapidities).
Moreover, the limiting case when k tends to infinity can be construedas ordinary multiplication of the reciprocals of nonzero numbers. Of course, the (nonzero) rational numbers are not finitely generated under this law, because there are infinitely many prime numbers.
More generally, we may consider any continuous monotonous function f from negative infinity to positive infinity and define an abelian group law over the real numbers by:
x y = f ( f -1 (x) + f -1 (y) )
Our previous discussion is a special case of that if we choose f to be either the trigonometric tangent or the hyperbolic tangent. The former for a line which doesn't intersect the basic circle, the latter for a line which does.
(2017-07-30) Introduced by Von Neumann to discuss the Banach-Tarski paradox.
An amenable group is a locally compact topological group whose elements leave invariant some kind of averaging on bounded functions.
The English word was coined in 1949 by Mahlon M. Day as a pun ("a-mean-able") to translate the German term originally used by Von Neumann in 1929 (messbar = measurable). The French use either the English term or the (better) word moyennable.
(2017-07-28) F is the smallest of the three nested groups F, T and V.
The three Thompson groups F, T and V are also called vagabond groups, chameleon groups or just chameleons (the latter term was coined by Matt Brin in1994). They have unusual properties which have made them counterexamples to several conjectures in group theory.
F can be defined as the subgroup of the piecewise-linear automorphisms of theinterval [0,1] consisting of all functions f such that:
f is differentiable outside of a finite set of dyadic rational numbers (i.e., values of fractions whose denominators are powers of 2).
When it exists, the derivative of f is a power of 2.
Group T :
Group V :
(2020-01-27)
Let M be a sandpile for which there's a sandpile Z such that M+Z = M. Then, Z is a zero (i.e. it's a neutral element for addition) overthe set of all sandpiles of the form X+M, since:
(X+M) + Z = X + (M+Z) = X+M
(2006-03-01) Each is isomorphic to the Restricted Lorentz Group SO+(3,1).
=
-1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1
The Lorentz GroupO(3,1) is isomorphic to SL(2,C) andconsists of all 4 by 4 real matrices A such thatA* A = 1,where is the metric matrix for three dimensionsof space and one dimension of time.
SO+(3,1) is the (6-dimensional) Restricted Lorentz Group consisting of the elements of the Lorentz GroupO(3,1) which preserve the direction of time and the orientation of space (boosts and 3D rotations). In the above, T and P denote a reversal of time and an inversionof space (the latter could be either a mirror symmetry about a planeor a symmetry about a point).
Poincaré Group :
The Poincaré GroupISO+(3,1) is the 10-dimensional inhomogeneous group of noninverting isometriesfor 3 dimensions of space and one dimension of time. It consists of transformations mapping x to x+a , where belongs to the above Restricted Lorentz GroupSO+(3,1) and a is some 4-vector.
Wigner's Classification :
(2006-03-21) The laws of nature are invariant under a certain group of transformations.
In spite of their respective successes,General Relativity and theStandard Model are known to be imperfect theories,incompatible with each other. The ultimate laws of physics (if they exist) could onlyincorporate those two as approximations applicable to specific experimentaldomains (like Newtonian mechanics approximates Special Relativity for low speeds).
Nobody knows (yet) exactly what symmetries the ultimate laws of nature should have, but we may ponder the groups of local symmetries underlying modern mathematicaltheories of the 4 known physical interactions:
Maxwell's unificationof electricity and magnetism intoelectromagnetism has been ultimately construed as the discoverythat electrodynamics is invariant under local phase transformations, with the simple structure of U(1). The classical quantity associated with that symmetry (by Noether's theorem ) is simply electric charge.
Quantum electrodynamics (QED) describes electromagnetism as a quantum field. It became the basic paradigm for all subsequent quantum theories of fundamental physical interactions. QED describes how photons "mediate" the forcebetween electrons (or any other charged particles).
The electroweak theory is a satisfying unificationof electromagnetism and weak interactions under the symmetries of the direct productSU(2)U(1). It was devised in 1967 by Steven Weinberg (1933-) and Abdus Salam (1926-1996) building on earlier workof Sheldon Glashow (1932-). The three men shared the 1979 Nobel prize for this. The group SU(2) is isomorphic to 3-dimensional rotations. The broken electroweak symmetry translatesinto 4 vector bosons: (the photon) Z0, W+ and W-.
Broken:
The theory of strong interactions is known as quantum chromodynamics (QCD). It's based on an unbrokenSU(3) local symmetry, dubbed color symmetry because of a superficial similarity withthe rules ofcolor vision (whereby3 primary colors may combine to create colorlessness). QCD describes how gluons mediate the strong force between quarks (or anything else with color charge,including gluons themselves). There are 8 differenttypes of gluons, corresponding to the 8 dimensions ofSU(3). In this context, SU(3) is often denoted SUc(3). "C" stands forcolor.
As described by Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, gravity's local symmetry is that of thePoincarégroup, which preserves spacetime intervals, as well as the direction of timeand the orientation of space. The Poincaré group is 10-dimensional. However, a gauge field (the graviton) is associated only with the 4 dimensions of spacetimetranslations. Suspiciously, no such particle or field is associated withthe 6 dimensions corresponding toLorentz symmetries (3 dimensions for spatial rotationsand 3 dimensions forLorentz boosts).
The so-called Standard Model of particle physicistsdescribes both strong and electroweak interactions in a theoretical framework whose symmetries are those of the group SU(2)U(1)SUc(3), which has 12 dimensions.
The model depends on several parameters, adjusted tofit experimental data but otherwise unexplained. Different local symmetries would impose different restrictions,for better or for worse. Oneclassical grouppossessing more dimensions of symmetry (24) than the Standard Model is SU(5).
The correct local symmetry of "strong-electroweak" interactions would still notdetermine the masses of the vector bosons involved (particles ofspin 1) unlessmore is known about the way such a symmetry is broken.
A key aspect of particle physics which is based on a broken symmetry is theclassification of elementary particles into three generations of flavors.
A mind-boggling supersymmetry across different spins () seems required of any quantum theory designed to include gravity in a fully unified quantum theory "of everything": Supergravity, Superstrings, etc.
In2010, SirMichael Atiyah (1929-2019) remarked that the known physical symmetries occur naturally in the Tits-Freudenthalmagic square pertaining to associativehypercomplex numbers obtained through the Cayley-Dicksonconstruct. He speculated that the introduction of thefourth (nonassociative) hypercomplex division algebra (the octonions) is somehowrelated to gravity. He admonished younger investigators to considerthis possibility, which would give a beautiful role to allexceptional Lie groups.
(2019-03-12) QFT's renormalization group is a subgroupof the cosmic Galois group.
The name cosmic Galois group was coined by Pierre Cartier around 1998, as he shared the optimism of Fields medalist Maxim Kontsevich (1964-) in the following words:
The subject caught the attention of several other people connected with the IHES. One comprehensive introduction appears in the work (2004) of Alain Connes (1947-) and Matilde Marcolli(1969-).