Donato Bramante

Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...

(Also called 'A after his father Angelo)

Italian architect andpainter, b. about 1444 at Monte Asdrualdo (hence, sometimes A); d. inRome, 11 March, 1514. Nothing isknown of his early youth. His early artistic development also, about whichVasari has made so manyerroneous statements, is mostly a matter of conjecture. Today, however, it seems fairly certain that Laurana, the architect of the ducal palace atUrbino, showed him the way to the impressive style of the HighRenaissance. Bramante's artistic activity is divided into two periods of which the first was spent inMilan and the other inRome. His work inMilan is characterized by a pronounced picturesque, decorative style. InRome, on the other hand, we find a style which is more proper to the HighRenaissance, exemplified in works that are, as far as possible, free from all external decoration, impressive by reason of their proportions, and recalling the antique by their grandeur and power. In 1476 Bramante became the court architect of Lodovico Sforza (Il Moro), having been inMilan, as has been abundantly shown, from 1474. At first he seems to have been engaged principally as apainter, following the vigorous manner ofMantegna andMelozzo da Forlí. It istrue that only scanty remains of his work at this time have been found. Such are the recently discovered fresco fragments, transported from the Casa Prinetti to the Brera (single figures of warriors,philosophers, poets, and singers); the more poorly preserved decorativepaintings of the Casa Fontana, and among panel pictures undoubtedly the Scourging of Christ (Badia Chiaravalle nearMilan). Bartolomeo Suardi, called Bramantino [cf. Suida in Jahrbuch der Kunstsammlungen des allerhöchsten Kaiserhauses (1905), 1 sqq.], was his assistant and rather weak imitator in the field ofpainting, but not his teacher as was thought byVasari (ed. Milanesi-Sansoni, IV, 175). If Bramante occasionally devoted himself to Gothic, as he unquestionably did in some designs for theMilancathedral, he exhibits from the start an excellent style, which, asStile Bramantesco, became typical for theRenaissance architecture ofLombardy. It is characterized by ambitious proportions, internal concentration, a greater organic relation of parts, and by rich and fresh decorative forms.

His first great achievement in this line is the choir of the church ofSanta Maria presso S. Satiro, begun in 1476. The choir has a flat end and afalseapse, rendered in relieved perspective. The adjoiningsacristy, octagonal in plan and surmounted by adome, is charming on account of the richness of the interior articulation and most effective space-development. Its two interior stories are separated by a splendid terra-cotta frieze overlaid with bronze. The church came to have the same significance in NorthernItaly as the Pazzi Chapel or the Sacristy of Santo Spirito inFlorence. Still richer in ornament are thetransept and choir ofSanta Maria delle Grazie (1492-99), by which the superiority of the imposing new style over the Gothic can best be shown. In addition to these great churches, the Canonica, or canons' residence, of San Ambrogio (1492, only half completed) and the remodelled court of the Ospedale Maggiore are the only examples of Bramante's genius inMilan. A further development of this somewhat more decorative style to the larger, simpler proportions of the Roman period is suggested by the church of theBarnabites, Santa Maria di Capenuova in Pavia (1492), and also by the churches of Busto Arsizio and Santa Maria in Legnano. The magnificent articulation of the façade of Abbiategrasso shows in full development the powerful boldness of the Roman style whose growth, inRome, was influenced not only by the antique, but also by the use of a more intractable material (travertine) which made small, detail treatment an impossibility. The date of this church is probably 1497 instead of 1477, as Geymüller read it. Otherecclesiastical structures ofLombardy upon which the influence or imitation of Bramante is perceptible, are theCathedral ofComo (south portal), the Pilgrimage Church atCremona, and the Incoronata atLodi.

Even greater is the number of structures indirectly influenced by Bramante in Northern and MiddleItaly after the downfall of the Sforza inMilan (1499). Bramante at the end of the same year moved toRome where he found inAlexander VI and still more inJulius II magnanimous patrons. Here, too, very little is known of his early work. It is still disputed whether or not thecloister ofSanta Maria della Pace and the façade of theChurch of the Anima can be ascribed to him. This is alsotrue of the immense palace of Cardinal Raffaello Riario (the present Cancelleria) with the adjoining church of San Lorenzo in Damaso. On account of the inscribed dates (1489 and 1495) Gnoli ascribes them not to Bramante but to aTuscan master, whereas Geymüller more correctly persists in ascribing them to Bramante, basing his view on considerations of style and on Bramante's relation with the Sforzas and the Riarios; this would also explain Bramante's working inRome prior to 1492 [cf. Gnoli in Arch. stor. dell' arte (1892), IV, 176 sqq.; Riv. d'Italia (1898); and Geymüller in Rassegna d'arte (October and December, 1901), I]. The Palace Giraud Torlonia is a structure similar to the Cancellaria in its beautiful rhythmic articulation, its simplicity, and its monumental character. Undoubtedly Bramante is the designer of the pretty little circular temple in the court of San Pietro in Montorio (completed in 1502). It is planned quite after the manner of an antique temple and is the first structure consciously designed and executed in the classic spirit, embodying the purest and simplest forms and the most agreeable proportions. A peristyle, never carried out, was intended to complete the building. Other works of Bramante's first Roman period are the choir ofSanta Maria del Popolo, the plan for the reconstruction of the Vatican, the extension of the Belvedere court, etc. The most majestic creation, not only of Bramante and of the HighRenaissance, but in fact ofChristian art, is the new St. Peter's. According toVasari, this was intended originally to enclose the magnificenttomb ofJulius II, begun byMichaelangelo. But on account of the hopelessly ruinous condition of the old St. Peter's, its rebuilding became an immediate necessity and, indeed, was determined upon shortly after the accession ofJulius II, probably in connexion with the reconstruction of the Vatican. As early as 18 April, 1506, the cornerstone of the pier of St. Helena was laid, and a year later those of the other three piers at thetransept were in position. The ways and means employed by Bramante in dealing with the old building brought him many reproaches for his lack of sentiment, and earned for him the nickname ofRuinante. Nevertheless, the incomparable significance of this creation must not be overlooked because of such romantic sentiments, nor must it be forgotten that thepope had Bramante's plan carried out in spite of all remonstrances and of the enormous cost.

The artistic aims of the structure, or more especially of the original plans, are revealed by the numerous drawings, executed partly by the master himself, and partly by his assistants. Their critical examination and æsthetic appreciation are among Geymüller's chief achievements. According to him this brilliant plan passed through three stages: in the first, only a smallchapel for thetomb ofJulius II was contemplated; in the second, the continuation of the erection of the new buildings undertaken during the reigns ofNicholas V andPaul II; only in the third stage was an entirely independent new building decided upon. For it Bramante had in view, from the first, a building of centralized plan, more particularly the plan of a Greek cross. In this he saw the architectonic ideal which combined the greatest harmony, the most serviceable space-relations, as well as a tendency to the monumentally sublime. It was only as an alternative, so far as can be judged from extant sketches, that the master seems to have reserved for himself the possibility of using the Latin cross, being evidently compelled to make concessions to theliturgical needs of theChurch. According to the oldest drawings and a memorial medal of Caradosos,dated 1506, the original ground plan was a pure Greek cross, the termination of whose arms was apsidal on the interior, rectangular on the exterior. An immensedome was carried over the crossing. The predominant form of the interior was rotunda-like. For the four corners immensechapels were planned, which again repeated the Greek cross; they werecrowned by smaller domes, and each was flanked on the exterior by a tower. Between theapses of the cross-arms and these corner-towers lay largevestibules for thechapels of the flanking domes. In a second design the cross-arms are rounded and enclosed by immenseambulatory halls. The maindome is encircled by an arcadedcolonnade. The piers of the domes were enriched by niches emphasizing the dominantidea of the interior. InMilan, San Lorenzo, a church of centralized plan (seeB A), evidently served as a model for this design. The principalideas, however, were taken from the Pantheon and the Temple of Peace. The master was permitted to see only the initial steps towards the execution of his plan. He was able, nevertheless, to establish firmly its main lines for the architects who followed, inasmuch as the dome-supports with their arches, the southerntransept, and the side domes were carried out under his direction. After his death in 1514 the continuation of the work was entrusted to the aged Fra Giocondo, and soon after (on a recommendation made by Bramante during his lifetime) toRaphael. Later on,San Gallo andPeruzzi were placed in charge. Bramante's plans suffered many changes and encroachments under the various directors untilMichaelangelo returned to the fundamentalideas of the brilliant creator, and by the completion of thedome substantially carried the work to a conclusion. The curvature of thedome is not quite as bold and effective as that planned by Bramante; on the other hand it offers in its greater rise, a much more elegant and vigorous silhouette.

UnderJulius II the influence of Bramante was predominant. Not only were the most daring works of architecture entrusted to him, but all other important building operations, and, in general, all artistic undertakings depended on his initiative andapprobation, as thepainting of the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel and of theloggie and thestanze, or halls, of the Vatican. In this wayRaphael, his younger townsman, received the greatest possible aid and favour, whilst Bramante's intrigues againstMichaelangelo were positively spiteful according toVasari. Throughenvy ofMichaelangelo's mighty genius, he assigned to this great master only unsuitable and unpleasant commissions. Though these tragically strained relations between the two great artists at the court of the Roverepope seem to be apsychological puzzle, the key is to be found in the hard and self-torturing character of the Florentine. Bramante, on the contrary, was a man who enjoyed life in ahappy and liberal way, and whoknew how to live up to the dignity of his prominent position. The manifold character of his interests and activities is yet visible in his poems which have come down to us. WithMichaelangelo,Raphael, and Leonardo, he is one of the great intellects of the HighRenaissance; he resembles them also in the fact that only a small part of his plans was completed.

CONTACT US |ADVERTISE WITH NEW ADVENT