Burgundy

Please help support the mission of New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...

(LatinBurgundia,GermanBurgund,FrenchBourgogne).

Inmedieval times respectively a kingdom and a duchy, later a province ofFrance (to 1789), and now represented mostly by the departments of Ain, Saône-et-Loire, Côte-d'Or, and Yonne. It has nearly 2,000,000 inhabitants, and is famous for its diversified scenery, its rich wines, its rivers and canals, varied industries, mineral wealth, and many prosperous cities. In the fifth century a Germanic tribe, the Burgundi or Burgundiones, conquered from the Romans the fertile basins of the Rhone, the Saône, and the Loire, but were unable to maintain their sovereignty (Lyons,Geneva, Vienne) which in the next century they lost (534) to theFrankish successors ofClovis [Binding, "Das burgundisch-romanische Königreich von 443-532", Leipzig, 1868; Drapeyron, "Du rôle de la Bourgogne sous les Mérovingiens" in "Mém. lus à la Sorbonne", 1866, 29-42; B. Hauréau, "L'Église et l'Etat sous les premiers rois de Bourgogne" in "Mém. de l'Acad. des inscriptions et belles-lettres", Paris, 1867, XXVI (1), 137-172]. In the latter quarter of the ninth century this territory again acquired independence, first as the short-lived Kingdom of Arles, and then as the dual Kingdom of North and South (or Lesser) Burgundy, the latter including Provence or the lands between Lyons and the sea, while the former took in, roughly speaking, the territory north ofLyons, now divided betweenFrance andSwitzerland. These kingdoms, known as Transjurane and Cisjurane Burgundy, were reunited (935) under Rudolf II. The independence of this "middle kingdom", themedieval counterpart of modernSwitzerland, was short-lived, for in 1038 Emperor Conrad II obtained the crown of Burgundy for his son (later Emperor) Henry III. For two centuries German influence was uppermost in the counsels of the Burgundian rulers, but little by little the growing prestige and power of neighbouringFrance asserted themselves, beginning with the annexation ofLyons byPhilip the Fair in 1310 and ending with that ofSavoy and Nice in 1860. During this time, in language,laws and institutions Burgundy became regularly more closely assimilated toFrance, and finally an integral part of that nation when, on the death of Charles the Bold (1477), Louis XI incorporated withFrance the Duchy of Burgundy and extinguished thereby, in favour of the royal prerogative, one of the most important fiefs of the French Crown (G. Hüffer, "Das Verhältniss des Königreichs Burgund zu Kaiser und Reich, besonders unter Friedrich I",Paderborn, 1874; Reese, "Die staatsrechtliche Stellung der Bischöfe Burgunds und Italiens under Kaiser Friedrich I", Göttingen, 1885; cf. André Du Chesne, "Hist. des rois, ducs, et comtes de Bourgogne et d'Arles", Paris, 1619; de Camps, "De la souveraineté de la couronne de France sur les royaumes de Bourgogne Transjurane et d'Arles", in "Mercurede France", April, 1723; von Bertouch, "Burgund als Scheidewand zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich, eine historisch-politische Frage", Wiesbaden, 1885).

Themedieval political vicissitudes of the Kingdom of Burgundy are accurately outlined in E. Freeman, "Historical Geography of Europe" (ed. Bury, London, 1903),passim. The following passage from that work (pp. 258-259) exhibits in a brief but philosophic way the political vicissitudes and rôle ofmedieval Burgundy:

The Burgundian Kingdom, which was united with those ofGermany andItaly after the death of its last separate king, Rudolf the Third [1032], has had a fate unlike that of any other part ofEurope. Its memory, as a separate state, has gradually died out. The greater part of its territory has been swallowed up, bit by bit, by a neighbouring power, and the small part which has escaped that fate has long lost all trace of its original name or its original political relations. By a long series of annexations, spreading over more than five hundred years, the greater part of the kingdom has gradually been incorporated withFrance. Of what remains, a small corner forms part of the modernKingdom of Italy, while the rest still keeps its independence in the form of the commonwealths which make up the western cantons ofSwitzerland. These cantons, in fact, are the truest modern representatives of the Burgundian Kingdom. And it is on the confederation of which they form a part, interposed as it is betweenFrance,Italy, the newGerman Empire, and the modern Austrian Monarchy, as a central state with a guaranteed neutrality, that some trace of the old function of Burgundy, as the middle kingdom, is thrown. This function it shares with the Lotharingian lands at the other end of the empire, which now form part of the equally neutralKingdom of Belgium, lands which, oddly enough, themselves became Burgundian in another sense.

The present article deals chiefly with Northern Burgundy since the middle of the fourteenth century, and may serve as an introduction to the articles onBELGIUM and theNETHERLANDS.

States of the house of Burgundy

The formation of the Burgundian State from which sprang the two kingdoms ofBelgium and theNetherlands, is an historical phenomenon of intense interest. The Duchy of Burgundy was one of the fiefs of the French Crown. Made vacant in 1361 by the death of Philippe de Rouvre, the last of the older line of dukes, it was presented by John II, King ofFrance, to his son Philip the Bold who, at the age of fourteen, had fought so valiantly at hisfather's side in the battle ofPoitiers. In 1369, as the result of the negotiations with his brother, King Charles V, Philip married Marguerite de Male,widow of his predecessor and sole heir to the countship ofFlanders, thereby acquiring that magnificent domain including the cities ofAntwerp andMechlin and the countships ofNevers and Rathel, not to mention the countships of Artois and Burgundy to be inherited from his wife's grandmother. He thus became the most powerful feudary of the Kingdom ofFrance. To be sure he had to conquerFlanders by dint of arms, as the people ofGhent, who had rebelled against the late count, Louis de Male, had no intention of submitting to his heir. But Philip had the armies of his nephew, King Charles VI, march against them and they lost the battle of Roosebeke (1382); then, after continuing the struggle for two years longer, they were finallyobliged to submit in 1385. The Peace ofTournai put Philip in possession of his countship, yet he was not satisfied and, through adroit negotiations, he succeeded in securing foothold for hisfamily in most of the otherNetherland territories. By the marriage of his daughter Margaret with Count William of Hainault, proprietor of the countships of Hainault,Holland, and Zealand, Philip provided for the annexation of these three domains. Moreover, he obtained for his wife, Margaret, the inheritance of herwidowed and childless aunt, Jane, Duchess of Brabant and Limburg, and gave it to Anthony, his youngest son, whilst the eldest, John the Fearless, was made heir to his other states (1404). But John the Fearless did nothing great for theNetherlands, being better known for his ardent participation in the troubles that disturbed the Kingdom ofFrance during the reign of the deranged King Charles VI. After assassinating Louis ofOrléans, the king's brother, John himself perished at the Bridge of Montereau during his famous interview with the Dauphin, being dispatched by the latter's followers (1414). The first two Dukes of Burgundy who reigned in theNetherlands were pre-eminently French princes and bent upon preserving and augmenting the prestige they enjoyed inFrance as princes of the blood royal. On the other hand, their two successors were essentiallyBelgian princes whose chief aim was the extension of their domains and whose policy was distinctly anti-French. Of course the assassination at Montereau, by setting them at variance with the French Crown, had helped to bring this change about, but it would have taken place in any event. To avenge hisfather, Philip the Good allied himself with the English to whom he rendered valuable services, especially by delivering to themJoan of Arc, madeprisoner by his troops at Compiègne. When, in 1435, he at length became reconciled to the king by the treaty ofArras, it was on condition of being dispensed from all vassalage and of receiving the cities along the River Somme. At this price he agreed to help the king against his own former allies and participated in the unsuccessful siege of Calais (1436).

Effects of Philip's Rule

The chief work of Philip the Good was to reunite under his authority most of theNetherland provinces. In 1421 he purchased the countship ofNamur from John III, its last incumbent. In 1430 he became Duke of Brabant and Limburg as heir of his first cousin, Philip of Saint-Pol, son of Duke Anthony; in 1428 he constrained his cousin Jacqueline ofBavaria, Countess of Hainault,Holland, and Zealand, and Lady of Friesland, to recognize him as her heir, and even during her lifetime, in 1433, heobliged her to relinquish this inheritance. Finally, in 1444, he purchased the claims of Elizabeth of Gorlitz to theDuchy of Luxemburg, thus owning all of modernBelgium except the principality ofLiège, all the western provinces of the present Kingdom of theNetherlands, and several French provinces. However, this did not suffice and he managed to place his bastards in the episcopal Sees ofCambrai and Utrecht and his nephew in that ofLiège. Victorious over all his enemies, among whom was the King ofFrance, in 1437 he held out against the Emperor Sigismund who tried in vain to re-establish the dependency of theNetherlands upon the empire. On two different occasions in 1447 and 1463, he importuned the Emperor Frederick III to give him the title of king, but the attempts failed. Nevertheless, under the title of "Grand Duke of the West" he won the admiration of his contemporaries and was the richest and most powerful sovereign inEurope. It was he whomPope Nicholas V wished to place at the head of the newcrusade he was planning, and during a sumptuous feast at which he made the celebratedvoeu du faisan, Philip promised to take the cross. But thecrusade did not take place. Being master of so many provinces, Philip wished to unite them under a central government, but this was not easy of accomplishment. Each of them considered itself a self-governing State, independent of all the others and living its own life; moreover, the large cities ofFlanders also claimed to be separate commonwealths and tried to escape centralization. Despite his entreaties, Ghent forsook the duke at the siege of Calais in 1436; in 1438Bruges was the scene of a revolt where he was nearly madeprisoner; and in 1451 Ghent revolted. But the duke overcame all these obstacles to hisambition and, through his victory of Gavre in 1453; obtained possession of the commune ofGhent, the most intractable of all. The people ofLiège were now the only ones who resisted him, but in 1465 he conquered them at Montenaeken and imposed upon them very severe conditions. A twelvemonth later he destroyed the city of Dinant. During his last years Philip's faculties became impaired and Louis XI ofFrance not only made trouble between him and his son but even influenced the duke into giving up the cities of the Somme. However, in 1465 Philip became reconciled to his son, Charles, and confided to him the administration of affairs, dying 15 June, 1467. A shrewd man and cunning politician, Philip was likewise ostentatious, irascible, and licentious. The splendour of his court was unequalled, and the founding of the Order of the Golden Fleece atBruges in 1430, on the occasion of his third marriage, this time with Isabella ofPortugal, marks, to some extent, the culmination of the luxury of the time.

Charles the Bold

Inheriting neither the astuteness nor the vices of hisfather, Charles the Bold was industrious, eager forjustice, and irreproachable in his private life; but his boldness amounted to rashness and his ability was not at all commensurate with his unboundedambition. In his earlier years all was well. During hisfather's lifetime he placed himself at the head of the "League of the Public Weal" which gathered about him the French lords who were unfavourably disposed toward Louis XI. Charles was victorious over Louis at Montlhéry, after which triumph the Peace of Conflans (1465) gave him the cities of the Somme. He humbled the cities ofGhent andMechlin for having dared to oppose him, fought the people ofLiège at Brusthem, and deprived them of their freedom. King Louis XI, who strove to combat the duke by dint of intrigue, was destined to become the victim of his own trickery. While he was visiting Charles in Peronne, the latter sovereign learned that the people ofLiège were again in revolt, having been excited thereto by the king's agents. Furious at this intelligence, he kept Louisprisoner and forced him to accompany him toLiège where the wretched monarch witnessed the total destruction of the unfortunate city to which he had promised assistance (1468). Although the conqueror of all his enemies Charles still entertained mighty projects, and in 1469 he obtained the possession of the landgraviate of Alsace and the county of Ferrette (Pfirt) as security for a loan made to Sigismund. He prevailed upon Duke Arnoul to sell him the Duchy of Guelderland, the duke being atwar with his son Adolphus (1472). He then marched against the King ofFrance, but was stopped before the walls ofBeauvais by the heroic resistance of its citizens (1472) and made to sign the truce of Senlis. Nor was he any more successful in his attempt to obtain a king's crown from the Emperor Frederick III, to whose son, Maximilian, he had promised the hand of his own daughter, Mary. Later, however, the emperor and the duke met atTrier for the approachingcoronation, when the emperor, whom the agents of Louis XI had succeeded in alarming, hastily disappeared. At the same time Louis stirred up further hostilities against Charles on the Upper Rhine where a confederacy, including the Alsatian villages andSwiss cantons was already plotting against him. Meanwhile Charles had been wasting his troops on the tedious, fruitless siege of the little city of Neuss on the Rhine, and was therefore in no condition to rejoin his ally, Edward IV ofEngland, who had just landed inFrance. In order to have full sway along the Rhine he signed the truce of Soluvre (1475) with Louis XI and profited by it to take possession ofLorraine, which till then had separated his Burgundian domains from those of theNetherlands (provinces de par deça). He then advanced upon theSwiss who defeated him most mercilessly at Granson and Morat and fairly annihilated his army. René, the young Duke of Lorraine, recovered his country and when Charles afterwards laid siege toNancy, its capital city, he lostcourage, and betrayed by one of his own hirelings, was defeated and killed in a sortie. The next day his frozen corpse was found in a pond, having been half devoured by wolves (5 January, 1477).

Mary and the "Great Privilege"

This catastrophe left the Burgundian estates in a most critical condition. The sole heir to all these provinces, Mary of Burgundy, who was then barely twenty years old, beheld storms gathering both within and without. The King ofFrance seized the Duchy of Burgundy as a male fief of the Crown and also the cities of the Somme and held up the other provinces to tempt the cupidity of neighbouring princes. The large cities ofFlanders roused by Louis' confederates, grew restless and the States-General, convened in February, 1477,obliged the young duchess to grant the "Great Privilege". This famous act was a violent reaction not only against the despotical tendencies of the preceding governments, but also against all their work of unification; it destroyed central institutions and reduced the Burgundian States to nothing but a sort of federation of provinces combined under the regime of personal union. Not content with this, the people ofGhent brought to the scaffold Hugonet and d'Humbercourt, Mary's two faithful counsellors, whom they looked upon as representatives of the deceased duke's absolutist regime. Satisfied that the country was sufficiently weakened and disorganized, Louis XI threw off the mask and ordered his army into Artois and Hainault. The imminence of danger seemed to revive a spirit of loyalty in the Burgundian provinces and the marriage of Mary and Maximilian of Habsburg, son of Frederick III, was hastened. This marriage saved the inheritance of the young princess but, as we shall see, it resulted in thereafter making theNetherlands dependent upon foreign dynasties. Meanwhile Maximilian vigorously repulsed the French in the battle of Guinegate (1479). Unfortunately Mary of Burgundy died in 1482 from injuries sustained in a fall from her horse, and Maximilian's claim to the right of governing the provinces in the capacity of regent during the minority of his son Philip, roused the indignation of the States-General, which were led by the three largeFlemish cities ofGhent,Bruges, and Ypres. Duped by Louis XI they concluded with him the second Peace ofArras (1482) which gave the hand of their Princess Margaret to the Dauphin, with Artois and Burgundy for herdower, and Maximilian was deprived of his children who were provided with a regency council. This was the origin of a desparate struggle between himself and the States-General during which he was madeprisoner by the people ofBruges, and it was with the greatest difficulty that he obtained his freedom. Immediately upon his release he began again to contend with the States, which eventually wereobliged to submit to his power (1492), and the treaty of Senlis withFrance restored Artois to Maximilian with his daughter Margaret (1493). In this same year Maximilian became emperor and liberated his son Philip who assumed the government of theNetherlands.

Philip the Handsome

The reign of Philip the Handsome, which lasted thirteen years, promisedBelgium an era of self-government and independence, but his marriage with Joanna of Castile only paved the way for its dependence on a foreign sovereign as, on the death of the son of Ferdinand theCatholic and Isabella, it was Philip who, in the name of his wife, became King of Castile. However, he died in 1506 and as his father-in-law, Ferdinand, soon followed him to thetomb, it wasCharles, son of Philip the Handsome, who inherited all the great Spanish monarchy "on which the sun never set", theNetherlands being thenceforth only a dependency of his chief kingdom. But at first this was not noticeable.Charles, who was also the emperor (with the title ofCharles V), travelled much and paid frequent visits to theNetherlands, showing a special predilection for hisFlemish fellow-countrymen and knowing how to make himself popular among them. He confided their country to the care of his aunt, Margaret ofAustria, and later to that of his sister, Mary ofHungary (1531-55), both talentedwomen and of great service to him.Charles' reign represents the maximum of political and commercial prosperity in theNetherlands to which he annexed the city ofTournai (1521), the provinces of Friesland (1523),Utrecht and Overyssel (1528), Groningen and Drenthe (1536), and the Duchy of Guelderland (1543). Thus the patrimony was definitively settled and known thereafter as the Seventeen Provinces. By hisPragmatic Sanction of 1549Charles V declared this domain an indivisible whole and nothing contributed more to the formation of national unity. He sundered the ties of vassalage that boundFlanders to the Kingdom ofFrance, and although emperor, permitted the authority of the empire to come to naught in the provinces west of the Scheldt. Beginning with 1548 they intruth formed the "Circle of Burgundy", a title which implied little or noduty toward the empire. In the interiorCharles V organized a central government by creating three councils, called collateral, and established with a view to simplifying matters for thefemale ruler; they were the council of state for general affairs, the privy council for administrative purposes, and the council of finance. He introduced theInquisition, issued extremely severe "placards" prohibitingheresy, and harshly suppressed Ghent, his native city, which had refused to vote certain subsidies and had given itself up to acts ofviolence (1540). It was deprived of all its freedoms and at this time communal government may be said to have received its death-blow in theNetherlands.

Philip II

However,Charles V was sincerely regretted when, during a solemn session held atBrussels before representatives of the States, 25 October, 1555, he renounced the government of theNetherlands in favour of his son, Philip II. Strictly speaking, withCharles V ended the Burgundian era in this country which was subsequently known as theSpanishNetherlands. But as yet these states had no national name, the dukes generally alluding to them as theirprovinces de par deça in contradistinction to the Duchy and Countship of Burgundy which were territorially separated from them. Nevertheless, although this duchy and countship had been conquered byFrance, from the fifteenth century it had been customary to call them Burgundy, and their inhabitants Burgundians. Even the French spoken at the ducal court was called Burgundian. In spite of the efforts made at bringing about unification, the spirit of particularism prevailed in the various provinces in matters of legislation, each according politicalrights to its own inhabitants exclusively and opposing central institutions as much as possible. From the time of Philip the Good theNetherlands had been the centre of a luxurious and brilliant civilization, and Antwerp, which had replacedBruges, whose harbour had become sand-filled, was recognized as the chief commercial city ofEurope. Nothing could equal the sumptuousness of the court which was the rendezvous of many literary men and artists, and it was during the reign of Philip the Good that theBrugesschool ofpainting sprang up and prospered, boasting of such famous members as the brothersJohn and Hubert Van Eyck,Hans Memling, and Gerard David, whilstBrussels,Ghent,Louvain, and Antwerp gloried in artists likeRoger Van den Weyden, Hugo Van der Goes, Thierry Bouts, Quentin Metsys, and in the greatsculptor Claus Sluter. Although literature did not flourish to the same extent as the arts, the historians Philippe de Comines, Molinet,Chastelain, andOlivier de la Marche are certainly deserving of mention and were far superior to the French historians of the same epoch.

For the publicecclesiastical history of Burgundy see articlesBESANÇON,DIJON,LYONS, MÂCON. Also Antoine* Mille, "Abrégé chronologique de l'histoire ecclésiastique civile et littéraire de Bourgogne, depuis l'établissement des Bourguignons dans las Gaules jusqu'à l'année 1772" (Dijon, 1771-73); and the histories of variousreligious orders established in Burgundy, e.g. J. Foderé, "Narration historique et topographique des couvents de l'ordre de St-François et de Ste-Claire érigés en la province anciennement appelée de Bourgogne", etc. (Lyon, 1619); Lavirotte, "Mémoire statistique sur les établissements des Templiers et des Hospitaliers de St-Jean de Jérusalem en Bourgogne" (Paris, 1853); "Pèlerinages en Bourgogne" in "Congrès scient. France" (Autun, 1876-78), II, 90; Quantin, "Mémoire sur l'influence des monastères des ordres de St-Benoît et de Cîteaux en Bourgogne", in same collection (Auxerre, 1858059), II, 390; J. Simonnet, "Le clergé en Bourgogne" (XIV, XV siècles) in "Mém. de l'Acad. de Dijon" (1866), XIII, 21-143; C. Seignobos, "Le régime féodal en Bourgogne jusqu'en 1360, étude sur la société et les institutions d'une province française au moyen-âge", etc. (Paris, 1881).

CONTACT US |ADVERTISE WITH NEW ADVENT