(GermanLitauen)
An ancient grandy-duchy united with Poland in the fourteenth century.
The Lithuanians belong to the Indo-Germanicfamily, of which they form with the Letts and the extinct Borussians (OldPrussians) the Balto-Slavonic group. Within the Russian Empire they dwell principally in the governmental districts of Kovno, Grodno, Tchernigoff, and, in smaller numbers, in some few districts of RussianPoland (total in 1897: 1,658,542, or, including the Letts, 3,094,469). InGermany they are found in the northern part of East Prussia and in WestPrussia (total about 110,000). Concerning their early history, even today little reliable information is available. In the twelfth century of our era, we find them divided into various clans and taking part in thewars between the princes of Polozk, Novgorod, Tchernigoff, etc., now as allies of the princes and again as enemies. From the end of the twelfth century they were engaged in constantwarfare with the Order of the Brethren of the Sword, who were extending their conquests along the coast of the Baltic into Livonia. The Lithuanians were divided politically into numerous principalities, mostly hereditary, and to a great extent independent of one another.
The credit of having united them belongs to Prince Mendog (or Mindowe), who, towards the middle of the thirteenth century, succeeded in compelling the lesser princes to recognize his supremacy. With a view to strengthening his position against external enemies, especially theTeutonic Order, Mindowe and his wife soughtbaptism in 1250 or 1251, and received fromInnocent IV the royal crown, with which he wascrowned by theBishop of Kulm, in 1252 (1253) in presence of the Master of theTeutonic Order. As Mindowe desired a special diocese for his territories, one Christian, a member of theTeutonic Order, was by order of thepopeconsecratedBishop of Lithuania by Archbishop Albert of Riga. Notwithstanding Albert's efforts to secure this new diocese as suffragan of hissee, it was made directly dependent onRome. Of Christian's activity in Lithuania little isknown. At this period, however,Christianity acquired no firm footing in Lithuania proper; it was embraced only by Mindowe and his immediate friends, and by them purely for political reasons, and it was also with an eye to political interest that they reverted topaganism about 1262. As Christian was coadjutorBishop ofMainz as early as 1259, he cannot have long occupied the See of Lithuania; his successor, John, also a member of theTeutonic Order, also appears as coadjutorBishop ofConstance. Themurder of Mindowe by his nephew Traniate was followed by great political confusion and a complete relapse intopaganism. In the Russian territories, however, which were then and later known as Lithuanian,Christianity was retained under the Greek Orthodox form, these regions having been evangelized from Byzantium.
The first step towards the restoration of Lithuanina power was taken by Gedymin (archduke from 1316), when he introduced German colonists into his territories, and founded numerous cities and towns, granting them the privileges customary inGermany. The most important of these cities was Wilna, afterwards the capital of Lithuania. Gedymin succeeded in extending his kingdom to the east by successful battles with the Tatars, who had then made themselves masters ofRussia. From 1336 he was involved inwar with theTeutonic Order, and was slain while besieging Welona, one of their fortresses, in 1340 or 1341. Two of his sons, Olgerd and Keistut, successfully defended the independence of their kingdom against the order, while pushing their conquests further intoRussia. Vigorous champions ofpaganism, they opposed the entrance ofChristianity within their frontiers, although Gedymin, while himself remaining aheathen, had granted entire freedom to theChristian religion. Thus, theFranciscan andDominicanmonasteries founded at Wilna under Gedymin were suppressed by his sons. Olderd (d. 1377) was succeeded by his son Jagello, who made overtures to theTeutonic Order and concluded a secret treaty with it. Jagello, however, awakened the suspicions of his uncle, Keistut, who took up arms, surprised him at Wilna, and made himprisoner for a time. In the ensuing civilwar, Keistut allowed himself to be enticed into Jagello's camp under pledge of personal safety, but on his arrival there he was at once seized, thrown intoprison, and eventuallyput to death (1382).
In 1384, upon the death of Louis I ofHungary andPoland, the Polish nobles, havingcrowned his daughter Hedwig, decided that as the new queen was but fifteen years old, she must be provided with a consort capable of protecting her dominions. Their choice fell upon Jagello of Lithuania, whose hostility to theTeutonic Order made him their natural ally. Moreover, theCatholicChurch inPoland saw in this union the promise of glorious missionary activity in a land still for the most partpagan. TheFranciscan provincial, Kmita, who enjoyed Jagello's confidence, was one of the foremost advocates of union between the kingdoms. Jagello, after formally suing for the queen's hand, promised to embrace theCatholicFaith, with his brothers and all his subjects, to unite his Lithuanian and Russian lands forever with the Polish Crown, to recover at his own expense the territory taken fromPoland, and to pay Duke William ofAustria, who had been promised Hedwig's hand, and indemnity of 200,000 gulden. Hedwig at length consented to the match. Jagello wasbaptized on 15 Feb., 1386, taking the name Wladislaw, and on 4 March he was married to Hedwig andcrowned King Consort and Regent ofPoland.
As the result of this union between Lithuania andPoland, a mightyChristian kingdom arose in EasternEurope. Lithuania itself, three times as large asPoland, but far below it in culture, ceased to be independent, but it was now for the first time brought into immediate contact with Western civilization. In 1387 Jagello returned to his home, accompanied by missionaries. He won the good will of the nobles (boyars) forChristianity by granting them, on 20 February, the same liberties as were then enjoyed by theCatholic nobles inPoland. A see was established at Wilna, and Vasylo, a PolishFranciscan, appointed its firstbishop. The Russian portions of Lithuania (Kiev, Tchernigoff, etc.) remained Greek Orthodox, but the Samoghitians continued for some time longer to bepagans. To strengthen the internal union between the peoples, Polish law was conceded only to theCatholic Lithuanians in the Constitution of 1387, and marriage with the Green Orthodox was forbidden. At first the relation between Lithuania andPoland was simply a personal union. Jagello retained for himself the princely dignity, but appointed a governor for Lithuania — first his brother Skirgjello and then, from 1392 to 1430, his cousin Witold. His endeavour to maintain this relation of independence towards the Polish Crown was rendered abortive by his defeat at the hands of the Tatars in 1399, which compelled him to enter into closer relations with the Poles. In 1401 the political union of the kingdoms took place; Lithuania was to be independent as long as Witold lived, but was then to be annexed to the Crown ofPoland; Witold and the boyars took theoath of allegiance, and the Polish nobility promised to support the Lithuanians, and, after Jagello's death, to elect no king without first consulting them.
Besides their commonwarfare against theTeutonic Order, the fusion of the two peoples was furthered by the Assembly of Horodlo on the Bug, in 1413, at which the earlier union was renewed, and a large number of the Lithuanian boyars were admitted into the Polish nobility, receiving identical privileges. Furthermore, both the Polish and the Lithuanian nobility received from the king the right of convoking assemblies and parliaments in the interests of the kingdom with the permission of the prince. For the Lithuanians, whose government had previously been absolute, this right meant a constitution — even though oligarchical — by means of which they could readily make their influence felt in the affairs of the nation. But the division betweenCatholics and Greek Orthodox in the Little Russian districts still continued. To heal this, Witold laboured forecclesiastical union between the two sections of the people. In 1415 he summoned an Orthodox synod at Nowohorodok, which declared the LithuanianOrthodox Church, with itsmetropolitan of Kiev, independent of thePatriarch ofMoscow. In 1418 he sent Gregory Camblak (or Cemiwlak),Metropolitan of Kiev, with eighteen suffraganbishops, to theCouncil of Constance to conclude a union withRome, and to secure, in return for their recognition ofpapal supremacy, the retention of theSlavic Liturgy and Rite. The mission failed, however, nor were the negotiations at theCouncil of Florence in 1439 more successful. It was, indeed, only about 150 years later, at the Synod of Brest-Litovsk (1595-96), that the union of the Little Russian, orRuthenian, Church withRome was accomplished (seeUNION OF BREST).
Religious divisions and the establishment of Polish garrisons in Lithuania, created a state of feeling which, after Witold's death, manifested itself in repeated rebellions. The union was formally dissolved when, on the death of Casimir IV, in 1492, the Lithuanians chose his fourth son, Alexander, as their grand-duke, and the Poles elected his third son, John Albert, their king. Only thewar against theTeutonic Order, in 1499, brought the two peoples together once more. Even after the death of Alexander, in 1501, there still remained a powerful party in favour of independence; these found support inRussia, which, from the time of Ivan III (1462-1505), had been growing in power. The threatened separation, however, and the daily increasing evidence thatRussia was to be the chief rival ofPoland in EasternEurope, led to a reaction among the Poles. They recognized the urgent necessity of exchanging a deceptive union for a genuine unity of the whole Polish Empire. Four previous diets having vainly sought a solution of the problem, that assembled atLublin in 1569 at last affected the Union ofLublin. The union was proclaimed in July of the same year, and confirmed onoath by both parties. Henceforth, Poles and Lithuanians formed one kingdom, with one king elected in common, with a common diet, a common mint, etc.; of its earlier independence, Lithuania retained its own administration, its own finances, and its own army. Thereafter, Lithuania shared the fate ofPoland, although in 1648 one section of the Lithuanians of LittleRussia — the Ukraine — separated fromPoland and, in 1654, made their submission to the Tsar ofRussia. The various partitions ofPoland resulted in the larger portion of Lithuania being ceded toRussia, the smaller toPrussia.
(See alsoGREEK CATHOLICS IN AMERICA;GREEK CHURCH;EASTERN CHURCHES.)
For a complete bibliography of Lithuania consult BELTRAMAITIS, Bibliographical Materials (2nd ed., St. Petersburg, 1904) (in Russian). The most important works are: SCHLOEZER, Gesch. von Litauen als einen eigenen Grossfürstentum bis zum jahre 1659 (Halle, 1785); NARBUT, The Ancient History of the Lithuanian People (Vilna, 1835) (Polish); THEINER, Vetera Monum. Poloniæ et Lithuaniæ hist. illustrantia (3 vols., Rome, 1860-63); ANTONWITSCH, Historical Sketch of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (Kiev, 1878) (Russian); BATINSCHKOW, White Russia and Lithuania (St. Petersburg, 1890) (Russian); Brückner Ancient Lithuania (Warsaw, 1904) (Polish); TOTORAITIS, Die Litauer unter dem König Mindowe bis zum Jahre 1263 (Fribourg, 1905); LELEWEL, Hist. de la Lithuanie (Paris, 1861); Allgem. Litauische Rundschau (Tilsit, 1900 —). See also works on Poland, especially ROPELL and CARO, Gesch. Polens (5 vols., Hamburg and Gotha, 1840-88) (reaching to 1506); SCHIEMANN, Russland, Poland u. Livland bis ins 17. Jahrh. (2 vols., Berlin, 1884-87); MORFILL, Poland (London and New York, 1893), in Story of the Nations Series.
APA citation.Lins, J.(1910).Lithuania. InThe Catholic Encyclopedia.New York: Robert Appleton Company.http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09292a.htm
MLA citation.Lins, Joseph."Lithuania."The Catholic Encyclopedia.Vol. 9.New York: Robert Appleton Company,1910.<http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09292a.htm>.
Transcription.This article was transcribed for New Advent by David H. Stanley.
Ecclesiastical approbation.Nihil Obstat. October 1, 1910. Remy Lafort, Censor.Imprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York.
Contact information. The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address is webmasterat newadvent.org. Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical errors and inappropriate ads.