Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Observational Study
.2020 Feb 1;155(2):123-129.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4702.

Using Smartphones to Capture Novel Recovery Metrics After Cancer Surgery

Affiliations
Observational Study

Using Smartphones to Capture Novel Recovery Metrics After Cancer Surgery

Nikhil Panda et al. JAMA Surg..

Abstract

Importance: Patient-generated health data captured from smartphone sensors have the potential to better quantify the physical outcomes of surgery. The ability of these data to discriminate between postoperative trends in physical activity remains unknown.

Objective: To assess whether physical activity captured from smartphone accelerometer data can be used to describe postoperative recovery among patients undergoing cancer operations.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted from July 2017 to April 2019 in a single academic tertiary care hospital in the United States. Preoperatively, adults (age ≥18 years) who spoke English and were undergoing elective operations for skin, soft tissue, head, neck, and abdominal cancers were approached. Patients were excluded if they did not own a smartphone.

Exposures: Study participants downloaded an application that collected smartphone accelerometer data continuously for 1 week preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end points were trends in daily exertional activity and the ability to achieve at least 60 minutes of daily exertional activity after surgery among patients with vs without a clinically significant postoperative event. Postoperative events were defined as complications, emergency department presentations, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality.

Results: A total of 139 individuals were approached. In the 62 enrolled patients, who were followed up for a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 147 (77-179) days, there were no preprocedural differences between patients with vs without a postoperative event. Seventeen patients (27%) experienced a postoperative event. These patients had longer operations than those without a postoperative event (median [IQR], 225 [152-402] minutes vs 107 [68-174] minutes; P < .001), as well as greater blood loss (median [IQR], 200 [35-515] mL vs 25 [5-100] mL; P = .006) and more follow-up visits (median [IQR], 2 [2-4] visits vs 1 [1-2] visits; P = .002). Compared with mean baseline daily exertional activity, patients with a postoperative event had lower activity at week 1 (difference, -41.6 [95% CI, -75.1 to -8.0] minutes; P = .02), week 3 (difference, -40.0 [95% CI, -72.3 to -3.6] minutes; P = .03), week 5 (difference, -39.6 [95% CI, -69.1 to -10.1] minutes; P = .01), and week 6 (difference, -36.2 [95% CI, -64.5 to -7.8] minutes; P = .01) postoperatively. Fewer of these patients were able to achieve 60 minutes of daily exertional activity in the 6 weeks postoperatively (proportions: week 1, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.31-0.49]; P < .001; week 2, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.58]; P = .003; week 3, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.30-0.48]; P < .001; week 4, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.38-0.57]; P < .001; week 5, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42-0.60]; P < .001; week 6, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.79] vs 0.43 [95% CI, 0.33-0.52]; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Smartphone accelerometer data can describe differences in postoperative physical activity among patients with vs without a postoperative event. These data help objectively quantify patient-centered surgical recovery, which have the potential to improve and promote shared decision-making, recovery monitoring, and patient engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Onnela receives additional research funding from Harvard University, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, and Mindstrong Health (unrestricted gift for methods development in digital phenotyping). Dr Pradarelli receives funding through a research contract with Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices and Global Diagnostic Services as a coinvestigator for projects on new surgical device safety and grants from Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions outside the submitted work. Dr Qadan reported personal fees from Olympus outside the submitted work. Dr Gawande reported receiving a salary as the chief executive officer from Haven, a health care venture founded by Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway, and JPMorgan Chase, outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Recruitment of Patients for Study Participation, Including Screening for Eligibility and Reasons for Refusing Participation
Thirty-six postoperative events are described for 17 patients because 8 of 17 patients experienced more than 1 event.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Trends in Daily Exertional Activity Compared With Mean Preoperative Baselines Among Patients
Patients without (A) vs with (B) a clinically significant postoperative event. Solid circles for each trend represent mean daily exertional activity. Solid arrowheads along the x-axis indicate the timing of postoperative events. Absolute differences for those with postoperative events varied significantly from baseline (104.7 minutes) in week 1 (difference, −41.6 [95% CI, −75.1 to −8.0] minutes;P = .02), week 3 (difference, −40.0 [95% CI, −72.3 to 3.6] minutes;P = .03), week 5 (difference, −39.6 [−69.1 to −10.1] minutes;P = .01), and week 6 (difference, −36.2 [−64.5 to −7.8] minutes;P = .01).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Proportion of Patients With 60 or More Minutes of Daily Exertional Activity in the First 6 Weeks of Study Period
No differences existed at baseline (patients with a postoperative event, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.53-0.73] vs patients without a postoperative event, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.65-0.77];P = .15). Fewer patients with a postoperative event achieved 60 minutes of daily exertional activity than those without a postoperative event (week 1, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.70] vs 0.40 [95% CI, 0.31-0.49];P < .001; week 2, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.63-0.74] vs 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.58];P = .003; week 3, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.61-0.73] vs 0.39 [95% CI, 0.30-0.48];P < .001; week 4, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.65-0.76] vs 0.47 [95% CI, 0.38-0.57];P < .001; week 5, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71-0.81] vs 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42-0.60];P < .001; week 6, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.79] vs 0.43 [95% CI, 0.33-0.52];P < .001).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Lopez M, et al. . Association of wearable activity monitors with assessment of daily ambulation and length of stay among patients undergoing major surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(2):e187673-e187673. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7673 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krummel TM. The rise of wearable technology in health care. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(2):e187672-e187672. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7672 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torous J, Kiang MV, Lorme J, Onnela J-P. New tools for new research in psychiatry: a scalable and customizable platform to empower data driven smartphone research. JMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(2):e16. doi:10.2196/mental.5165 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith A. US smartphone use in 2015.https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/. Published April 1, 2015. Accessed October 14, 2019.
    1. Panda N, Solsky I, Haynes AB. Redefining shared decision-making in the digital era. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;(July):S0748-7983(19)30583-9. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp