Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

Randomized Controlled Trial
.2018 Sep 28;40(5):457-464.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx085.

Long-term remineralizing effect of MI Paste Plus on regression of early caries after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a 12-month follow-up randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Long-term remineralizing effect of MI Paste Plus on regression of early caries after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment: a 12-month follow-up randomized controlled trial

Moniek W Beerens et al. Eur J Orthod..

Abstract

Background: Casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous-calcium-fluoride-phosphate (CPP-ACFP) can remineralize subsurface lesions. It is the active ingredient of MI-Paste-Plus® (MPP). The long-term remineralization efficacy is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term effect of MPP versus a placebo paste on remineralization of enamel after fixed orthodontic treatment over a 12-month period.

Design: This trial was designed as a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled RCT.

Methods: Patients with subsurface lesions scheduled for removal of the appliance were included. They applied either MPP or control paste once a day at bedtime for 12 months, complementary to normal oral hygiene.

Main outcome measures: Changes in enamel lesions (primary outcome) were fluorescence loss and lesion area determined by quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). Secondary outcomes were Microbial composition, by conventional plating, and acidogenicity of plaque, by capillary ion analysis (CIA), and lesion changes scored visually on clinical photographs.

Randomization: Participants [age = 15.5 years (SD = 1.6)] were randomly assigned to either the MPP or the control group, as determined by a computer-randomization scheme, created and locked before the start of the study. Participants received neutral-coloured concealed toothpaste tubes marked A or B.

Blinding: The patients and the observers were blinded with respect to the content of tube A or B.

Results: A total of 51 patients were analysed; MPP (n = 25) versus control group (n = 26); data loss (n = 14). There was no significant difference between the groups over time for all the used outcome measures. There was a significant improvement in enamel lesions (fluorescence loss) over time in both groups (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), with no differences between groups.

Limitations: Being an in vivo study, non-compliance of the subjects could have influenced the result.

Conclusion: The additional use of MPP in patients with subsurface enamel lesions after orthodontic fixed appliance treatment did not improve these lesions during the 1 year following debonding.

Registration: This trial is registered at the medical ethical committee of the VU Medical Centre in Amsterdam (NL.199226.029.07).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of a clinical oral photo gallery of clinical photos from one subject captured at T1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Flow of participants through the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gorelick L., Geiger A.M. and Gwinnett A.J (1982)Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. American Journal of Orthodontics, 81, 93–98. - PubMed
    1. Lovrov S., Hertrich K. and Hirschfelder U (2007)Enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment—incidence and correlation to various oral-hygiene parameters. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics, 68, 353–363. - PubMed
    1. Mizrahi E. (1983)Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, 323–331. - PubMed
    1. Ogaard B., Rølla G., Arends J. and ten Cate J.M (1988)Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 2. Prevention and treatment of lesions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 94, 123–128. - PubMed
    1. Rosenbloom R.G. and Tinanoff N (1991)Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 100, 35–37. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp