Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2018 Jan;97(1):14-21.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014

Affiliations

Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014

Megan L Kavanaugh et al. Contraception.2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to examine levels of, correlates of and changes in the use of individual and grouped methods of contraception among US females aged 15-44 from 2008 to 2014.

Study design: Using three rounds of the National Survey of Family Growth, we analyzed samples of 12,279 (2008), 5601 (2012) and 5699 (2014) females. We conducted simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations between demographic characteristics and contraceptive use, as well as between characteristics and changes in use patterns.

Results: In terms of overall trends in contraceptive use between 2008 and 2014, there was no significant change in the proportion of women who used a method among either all women (60%) or those at risk of unintended pregnancy (90%). Significant changes in use occurred among six methods. The largest increase in use was among users of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, including the intrauterine device and implant - from 6% to 14% - across almost all population groups of female contraceptive users, while the largest decrease occurred among users of sterilization - from 37% to 28% - with lower-income women driving the decline in female sterilization and higher-income women driving the decline in a partner's sterilization as a primary method. Moderate increases were seen in the use of withdrawal and natural family planning.

Conclusion: Most shifts in recent contraceptive use have occurred among the most effective methods - sterilization and LARCs. Differences in method-specific user characteristics underscore the importance of ensuring full access to the broad range of methods available.

Implications: The lack of change in the overall use of contraceptives among women at risk for unintended pregnancy may have implications for the extent to which further declines in national rates of unintended pregnancy can be expected.

Keywords: Contraceptive use; Method mix; National Survey of Family Growth; Unintended pregnancy; United States.

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. Med. 2016;374:843–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J, Finer LB. Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. women, 2009–2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:917–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:893–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daniels K, Daugherty J, Jones J, Mosher WD. National Center for Health Statistics. Division of Vital Statistics; Hyattsville, MD: 2015. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013.
    1. Mosher WD, Moreau C, Lantos H. Trends and determinants of IUD use in the USA, 2002–2012. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1696–702. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp