Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Computer Science

Computer Science ››2018,Vol. 45 ››Issue (6): 211-215.doi:10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2018.06.038

• Artificial Intelligence • Previous Articles    Next Articles

Complexity of CP-nets Learning

LIU Jing-lei1,2, LIAO Shi-zhong1  

  1. SchoolofComputerScienceandTechnology,TianjinUniversity,Tianjin 3000721;
    SchoolofComputerandControlEngineering,YantaiUniversity,Yantai,Shandong 2640052
  • Received:2017-05-30Online:2018-06-15Published:2018-07-24

Abstract:CP-nets (Conditional Preference networks) are a kind of simple and intuitively graphical tool for representing conditional preference,three fundamental research questions of which are representation,reasoning and learning.Diffe-rently from the research point from statistical learning theory,the binary-valued CP-nets learning issues were studied based on logic theory.Firstly,an intimate relationship between satisfiability of proposition logic formula and preference assertion is given,therefore,the learning problem on CP-nets is transformed into the proposition reasoning.In the se-cond place,the computational complexity for learning two kinds of specific CP-nets is given,the learning problem of most complicated acyclic CP-nets is NP-complete,whereas the learning problem of the simplest set-structured CP-nets isP.These interesting results establish the upper and lower bound of complexity for learning specific structured (e.g.,list-structured,bounded tree-width) CP-nets.

Key words:Binary-valued conditional preference networks,Bounded tree-width CP-nets,Reasoning and learning,Satisfiability of propositional formula,Upper and lower bound of complexity

CLC Number: 

  • TP182

Cite this article

LIU Jing-lei, LIAO Shi-zhong. Complexity of CP-nets Learning[J].Computer Science, 2018, 45(6): 211-215.

[1]DOMSHLAK C,HULLERMEIER E,KACI S,et al.Preferences in AI:An Overview [J].Artificial Intelligence,2011,175(7/8):1037-1052.
[2]BOUTILER C,BRAFMAN R,DOMSHLAK C,et al.CP-nets:A Tool for Representing and Reasoning with Conditional Ceteris Paribus Preference Statements [J].Journal of artificial intelligence research,2004,21(1):135-191.
[3]MATTEI N,PINI M S,ROSSI F,et al.Bribery in Voting withCP-nets[J].Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,2013,68(1):1-26.
[4]ALANNAZI E,MOUHOUB M,ZILLES S.The Complexity of Learning Acyclic Cp-nets [C]//The 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.New York,2016:1361-1367.
[5]LIU J L,LIAO S Z.Expressive Efficiency of Two Kinds of Specific CP-nets[J].Information Sciences,2015,295(2):379-394.
[6]LIU J L,LIAO S Z,ZHANG W.On the Completeness and Consistency for CP-nets[J].Journal of Software,2012,23(6):1531-1541.(in Chinese)
刘惊雷,廖士中,张伟.CP-nets的完备性及一致性研究[J].软件学报,2012,23(6):1531-1541.
[7]LIU J T,XIONG Y,WU C H,et al.Learning Conditional Preference Networks from Inconsistent Examples [J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2014,26(2):376-390.
[8]KOROCHE F,ZANNUTTINI B.Learning Conditional Preference Networks [J].Artificial Intelligence,2010,174(11):685-703.
[9]HUANG S J,JIN R,ZHOU Z H.Active Learning by Querying Informative and Representative Examples [J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2014,36(10):1936-1949.
[10]LANG J,MENGIN J.The Complexity of Learning Separable Ceteris Paribus Preferences [C]//Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2009:848-853.
[11]DIMOPOULOS Y,MICHAEL L,ATHIENITOU F.Ceteris Paribus Preference Elicitation with Predictive Guarantees [C]//Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2009:1890-1895.
[12]MUGGLETON S,MARGINEAN F.Logic-based Machine Learning [M]//Logic-based Artificial Intelligence.Springer US,2000:315-330.
[13]GOLDSMITH J,LANG J,TRUSZCZYNSKI M,et al.The Computational Complexity of Dominance and Consistency in CP-nets[J].Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,2008,33(1):403-432.
[14]LU T,BOUTILIER C.Effective Sampling and Learning for Mallows Models with Pairwise Preferences Data [J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2014,16(12):3783-3829.
[15]COJAOGHLAN A.Belief Propagation Guided Decimation Fails on Random Formulas [J].Journal of the ACM,2017,63(6):1-49,55.
[16]OBIEDKOV S.Parameterized Ceteris Paribus Preferences Over Atomic Conjunctions under Conservative Semantics [J].Theoretical Computer Science,2016,658(1):375-390.
[17]DAVIDE G,EMILIANO L,FRANCOIS S.The Ceteris Paribus Structure of Logics of Game Forms [J].Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,2015,53(1):91-126.
[18]BENTHEM V,GIRARD P,ROY O.Everything Else Being Equal:A Modal Logic for Ceteris Paribus Preferences [J].Journal of Philosophical Logic,2009,38(1):83-125.
[19]GOTTLOB G,PICHLER R,WEI F.Bounded Treewidth as a Key to Tractability of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning[J].Artificial Intelligence,2010,174(1):105-132.
[20]ZHOU L,WANG L,LIU L,et al.Learning Discriminative Bayesian Networks from High-dimensional Continuous Neuroimaging Data [J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,2016,38(11):2269-2283.
[1]WANG Jie, LI Xiao-nan, LI Guan-yu.Adaptive Attention-based Knowledge Graph Completion[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(7): 204-211.
[2]FANG Lian-hua, LIN Yu-mei, WU Wei-zhi.Optimal Scale Selection in Random Multi-scale Ordered Decision Systems[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6): 172-179.
[3]XU Si-yu, QIN Ke-yun.Topological Properties of Fuzzy Rough Sets Based on Residuated Lattices[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 140-143.
[4]CAI Xiao-juan, TAN Wen-an.Improved Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Combining Similarity and Trust[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(6A): 238-241.
[5]LI Yan-yan, QIN Ke-yun.On Topological Properties of Generalized Rough Approximation Operators[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(3): 263-268.
[6]ZHAO Yang, NI Zhi-wei, ZHU Xu-hui, LIU Hao, RAN Jia-min.Multi-worker and Multi-task Path Planning Based on Improved Lion Evolutionary Algorithm forSpatial Crowdsourcing Platform[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(11A): 30-38.
[7]XU Jin.Construction and Application of Knowledge Graph for Industrial Assembly[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(6A): 285-288.
[8]DING Ling, XIANG Yang.Chinese Event Detection with Hierarchical and Multi-granularity Semantic Fusion[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(5): 202-208.
[9]LU Xun, LI Yan-yan, QIN Ke-yun.Relationship Among Three Types of Rough Approximation Pairs[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(4): 49-53.
[10]HU Ping, QIN Ke-yun.Similarity Construction Method for Pythagorean Fuzzy Set Based on Fuzzy Equivalence[J]. Computer Science, 2021, 48(1): 152-156.
[11]GUO Qing-chun,MA Jian-min.Judgment Methods of Interval-set Consistent Sets of Dual Interval-set Concept Lattices[J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(3): 98-102.
[12]FENG Chen-jiao,LIANG Ji-ye,SONG Peng,WANG Zhi-qiang.New Similarity Measure Based on Extremely Rating Behavior[J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(2): 31-36.
[13]SHI Xiao-ling, CHEN Zhi, YANG Li-gong, SHEN Wei.Matrix Factorization Recommendation Algorithm Based on Adaptive Weighted Samples[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(6A): 488-492.
[14]CHEN De-jiang, WANG Jun, ZHANG Hao-wei.Dynamic Threat Assessment Model Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(4): 183-188.
[15]LIN Hong, QIN Ke-yun.Attribute Reduction for Decision Formal Contexts Based on Threek-way Decision Rules[J]. Computer Science, 2019, 46(3): 248-252.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

 Shared  
 Discussed  
No Suggested Reading articles found!
TOP
渝ICP备16013121号-4
Add:18# Honghu West Rd., Yubei ,Chongqing,China    Post Code: 401121
Tel: 023-63500828/023-67039612/023-67039623
E-mail: jsjkx12@163.com
Powered byBeijing Magtech Co., Ltd.

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp