Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Eurekaselect logo
Bentham Newsletternewsletter banner
Login
Login

Forgot Your Password? New around here? Sign up
Register Cart 0
Generic placeholder image

Current Aging Science

Editor-in-Chief

ISSN (Print): 1874-6098
ISSN (Online): 1874-6128

Assessing Medication Problems in those ≥ 65 Using the STOPP and START Criteria

Author(s):Roger E. Thomas

Volume 9, Issue 2, 2016

Page: [150 - 158]Pages: 9

DOI:10.2174/1874609809999160217101716

Price: $65

TIMBC 2025
Abstract

Background: Polypharmacy is a key problem for those ≥65.

Objective: To summarise for individuals ≥65 the rates of Potentially Inappropriate Medications(PIMs) identified by application of STOPP, and Potential Prescribing Omissions (PPOs) by STARTcriteria.

Methods: Search: Databases were searched 1980 to 1 December 2015. For Medline the searchyielded 3,691 systematic reviews or meta-analyses and 301 when limited to 65 years and over.STOPP.mp yielded 180 citations, START.mp 109,132 and 105 when limited to both. For Embase thesearch yielded 24,681 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 881 when limited to 65+ years. STOPP.mp yielded 427citations and START.mp 147,322, and 327 when limited to both.

Results: Search: identified 28 studies with data and plus a systematic review using STOPP/START criteria. For communitydwelling-individuals for national outpatient databases (n=1,528,785) PIMs weighted average was 31%, PPOs 47%.For small community studies (n=2,228) PIMs weighted average was 26%, PPOs 24%. For hospitalised patients (n=4,237)PIMs weighted average was 47%, PPOs 50%. For nursing home patients PIMs weighted average (n=1,539 patients) was59%, PPOs (n=463 residents) 49%. Principal PIMs were benzodiazepines, proton pump inhibitors, NSAIDs, aspirin, andduplicate medications. Principal PPOs were omissions of medications for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, osteoporosis,diabetes and hyperlipidemia.

Conclusions: Rates of PIMs and PPOs are high. Criteria are currently based on expert consensus. Next steps are to linkcriteria to the best internationally-accepted evidence-based systematic reviews/guidelines and conduct RCTs to testwhether application of the criteria leads to lower rates of medication errors and hospital admissions.

Keywords:STOPP and START criteria, polypharmacy, individuals ≥ 65, patients in the community, hospitals and nursinghomes, drug-related, drug safety, side effects, adverse reactions


Rights & PermissionsPrintCite

Current Aging Science

Title:Assessing Medication Problems in those ≥ 65 Using the STOPP and START Criteria

Volume: 9Issue: 2

Author(s):Roger E. Thomas

Affiliation:

    Keywords:STOPP and START criteria, polypharmacy, individuals ≥ 65, patients in the community, hospitals and nursinghomes, drug-related, drug safety, side effects, adverse reactions

    Abstract: Background: Polypharmacy is a key problem for those ≥65.

    Objective: To summarise for individuals ≥65 the rates of Potentially Inappropriate Medications(PIMs) identified by application of STOPP, and Potential Prescribing Omissions (PPOs) by STARTcriteria.

    Methods: Search: Databases were searched 1980 to 1 December 2015. For Medline the searchyielded 3,691 systematic reviews or meta-analyses and 301 when limited to 65 years and over.STOPP.mp yielded 180 citations, START.mp 109,132 and 105 when limited to both. For Embase thesearch yielded 24,681 systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 881 when limited to 65+ years. STOPP.mp yielded 427citations and START.mp 147,322, and 327 when limited to both.

    Results: Search: identified 28 studies with data and plus a systematic review using STOPP/START criteria. For communitydwelling-individuals for national outpatient databases (n=1,528,785) PIMs weighted average was 31%, PPOs 47%.For small community studies (n=2,228) PIMs weighted average was 26%, PPOs 24%. For hospitalised patients (n=4,237)PIMs weighted average was 47%, PPOs 50%. For nursing home patients PIMs weighted average (n=1,539 patients) was59%, PPOs (n=463 residents) 49%. Principal PIMs were benzodiazepines, proton pump inhibitors, NSAIDs, aspirin, andduplicate medications. Principal PPOs were omissions of medications for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, osteoporosis,diabetes and hyperlipidemia.

    Conclusions: Rates of PIMs and PPOs are high. Criteria are currently based on expert consensus. Next steps are to linkcriteria to the best internationally-accepted evidence-based systematic reviews/guidelines and conduct RCTs to testwhether application of the criteria leads to lower rates of medication errors and hospital admissions.

    Export Options

    About this article

    Cite this article as:

    E. Thomas Roger, Assessing Medication Problems in those ≥ 65 Using the STOPP and START Criteria, Current Aging Science 2016; 9 (2) .https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874609809999160217101716

    DOI
    https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874609809999160217101716
    Print ISSN
    1874-6098
    Publisher Name
    Bentham Science Publisher
    Online ISSN
    1874-6128
    Related Journals

    Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry

    Current Diabetes Reviews

    Current Neuropharmacology

    Current Neurovascular Research

    Central Nervous System Agents in Medicinal Chemistry

    Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews

    Current Pediatric Reviews

    Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets

    Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders - Drug Targets

    Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy

    Related Books

    Infections and Male Infertility: General Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

    Advancements in Cancer Research: Exploring Diagnostics and Therapeutic Breakthroughs

    Common Ear Diseases in Dogs: Diagnosis and Management

    Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Update with New Insights

    Vector Borne Diseases: Current Trends and Public Health Perspectives

    Parasitic Diseases of Goats

    Concise Handbook of Epidemiology (Second Edition)

    Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Screening in the Elimination of HPV-Associated Cancers: Evidence-Based Randomized Trials

    Frontiers in Clinical Drug Research-Dementia

    COVID-19: Causes, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment

    Article Metrics
    79
    4
    2
    1
    Wayfinder Image
    TIMBC 2025
    Related Articles
    © 2025 Bentham Science Publishers |Privacy Policy

    [8]ページ先頭

    ©2009-2025 Movatter.jp