The city that got left behind
Can India’s original economic powerhouse get its act together again?

A NATIVE-BORN writer, Amit Chaudhuri, says that Calcutta should be compared to world cities like New York and Paris for its rich past and mix of influences. Yet ever since the Suez Canal was built in 1869, boosting trade in Bombay (now Mumbai), people have said the city (now Kolkata) has been going to the dogs. They have been right. Calcutta lost its title as India's capital a century ago, and its status as the country's industrial engine in the 1950s. By the early 1970s visitors were making apocalyptic predictions of plagues and starving, rampaging mobs, and by the end of that decade Marxists were in charge. Today Kolkata evokes Havana, beautiful but shabby, the last city to remain largely untouched by India's 20-year boom. “I love the city, but am ashamed of its condition,” says Sandipan Chakravortty, boss of one of the few units of the giant Tata Group to be based there.
This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline “The city that got left behind”

From the January 7th 2012 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
⇒Explore the edition
Why Christianity is taking an Asian turn
Believers have clout in South Korea, the Philippines, Japan and beyond

Indians are losing big on the stockmarket
The middle-class enthusiasm for derivatives is a relatively new phenomenon

Why Narendra Modi has embraced an anti-caste icon
B.R. Ambedkar dedicated his life to challenging Hinduism
The biggest bugs in the new gold rush are Asian
Wall Street is loading up on bullion. So are people in China and India
Where new talks between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un might go
A crisis is more likely than a genuine breakthrough
Japan faces a reckoning over rice
A crisis over its staple reveals cracks in the country’s food system