Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


skip to content
University of Cambridge
Home

Darwin Correspondence Project

Search form

Divergence

Divergence figure from the Origin of Species
http://biodiversitylibrary.org/item/135954#page/138/mode/1up
Divergence figure from the Origin of Species
Image from the Biodiversity Heritage Library. Digitised by Harvard University Botany Libraries

Ina later account of how he had come to the evolutionary ideas published inOrigin, Darwin wrote: 'Of all the minor points, the last which I appreciated was the importance & cause of the principle of Divergence' (to Ernst Haeckel, [after 10] August - 8 October [1864]).

Darwin set out to explain how intermediate forms in any species or genera tend to die out and leave the extreme forms to survive and pass on their characteristics. This 'principle of divergence' - or as he described it 'the tendency to the preservation from extinction of the most different members of each group' - was prompted by the observation that any given habitat supports more life if it is occupied by many different life-forms. Overall agricultural yields, for example, were much higher where a variety of crops were grown together. Darwin realised that varied offspring could colonise a wider range of habitats than the parent organism; competition would be fiercest for the middle ground where all forms could thrive, while those at opposite ends of any spectrum could more easily co-exist. The intermediate forms were therefore more likely to struggle to the point where they became extinct, while the extreme forms flourished and might eventually become established as new species. Darwin saw these processes as the origin of the branching relationships between species, genera, families, orders, and classes.

Darwin first mentioned the principle by name in aletter to Joseph Hooker in August 1857, but didn't explain what he meant. Shortly afterwards, in September 1857, he included a brief outline of the principle in aletter to Asa Gray where he set out the state of his thinking on evolution:

One other principle, which may be called the principle of divergence plays, I believe, an important part in the origin of species. The same spot will support more life if occupied by very diverse forms: we see this in the many generic forms in a square yard of turf (I have counted 20 species belonging to 18 genera),-or in the plants and insects, on any little uniform islet, belonging almost to as many genera and families as to species. . . . the varying offspring of each species will try (only few will succeed) to seize on as many and as diverse places in the economy of nature, as possible. Each new variety or species, when formed will generally take the places of and so exterminate its less well-fitted parent. This, I believe, to be the origin of the classification or arrangement of all organic beings at all times. These alwaysseem to branch and sub-branch like a tree from a common trunk; the flourishing twigs destroying the less vigorous...

He described its operation in great detail inOrigin (pp.111-126), and it is explained figuratively in the only diagram included in the book. Before embarking onOrigin, he had already partially written it up, and had described it to Hooker in June 1858 as being, together with the mechanism of natural selection, 'the key-stone' of the much longer book he had intended to call 'Natural selection' but which he never finished (seeNatural selection, pp. 227-50).

Darwin's correspondence suggests that he was already beginning to think along these broad linesas early as 1844, and was certainlyinvestigating the numbers and diversity of species inhabiting the same area by 1846. For a full definition of the principle of divergence and the background to Darwin's final formulation of it between November 1854 and 1858, see Browne 1980, Ospovat 1981, pp. 170-209, and Kohn 1985.

Terms:
Related letters:
744
996
2134
2136
2176
2282
3484
4631
Related bibliographic reference:
Browne, Janet. 1980. Darwin's botanical arithmetic and the 'principle of divergence', 1854-1858.Journal of the History of Biology 13: 53-89.
Ospovat, Dov. 1981.The development of Darwin's theory. Natural history, natural theology, and natural selection, 1838-1859. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohn, David. 1985. Darwin's principle of divergence as internal dialogue. InThe Darwinian heritage, edited by David Kohn. Princeton: Princeton University Press in association with Nova Pacifica (Wellington, NZ).

In this section:

Related letters

To J. D. Hooker 31 March [1844]

Thanks for JDH's interesting details about the Galapagos.

Clarification of CD's query about the relationship between the range of a genus and the ranges of its constituent species.

To J. D. Hooker [3 September 1846]

Has nearly finishedSouth America.

Pleased to hear JDH has worked out identical and representative species of N. Temperate and Antarctic regions.

Geoffroy Saint Hilaire's "loi du balancement" as applied to plants.

CD jaded by, but has nearly completed,South America.

To J. D. Hooker 22 August [1857]

Tabulation of varieties goes on; very important as it shows the branching of forms. Mentions his principle of divergence.

To Asa Gray 5 September [1857]

Encloses an abstract of his ideas on natural selection and the principle of divergence; the "means by which nature makes her species".

Discusses varieties and close species in large and small genera, finding some data from AG in conflict with his expectations.

Has been observing the action of bees in fertilising kidney beans andLobelia.

To Asa Gray 29 November [1857]

Thanks AG for his criticisms of CD's views; finds it difficult to avoid using the term "natural selection" as an agent.

Discusses crossing inFumaria and barnacles.

Has received a naturally crossed kidney bean in which the seed-coat has been affected by the pollen of the fertilising plant.

Finds the rule of large genera having most varieties holds good and regards it as most important for his "principle of divergence".

To J. D. Hooker 8 [June 1858]

Pleased with JDH's reaction to MS on large and small genera.

Confident of soundness of principle of divergence.

CD experimenting on pollination mechanism of Leguminosae. Asks JDH to investigate Fumariaceae.

To J. D. Hooker 26 [March 1862]

Both JDH's and Bates's letters are excellent. JDH has said all that can be said against direct effect of conditions, but CD still sticks to his own and Bates's side. CD should have done what JDH suggests (since naturally he is pleased to attribute little to conditions) - viz., started on the fundamental principle that variation is innate and stated that afterwards, perhaps, this principle would be made explicable.Variation will show that "use and disuse" have some effect. Does not believe in perfect reversion. Demurs at JDH's "centrifugal variation"; the doctrine of the good of diversification amply accounts for variation being centrifugal.

The wonderful mechanism ofMormodes ignea.

To Ernst Haeckel [after 10] August - 8 October [1864]

Can understand EH's feelings on death of his wife.

CD was impressed by manner in which species in South America are replaced by closely allied ones, by affinity of species inhabiting islands near S. America, and by relation of living Edentata and Rodentia to extinct species. When he read MalthusOn population, the idea of natural selection flashed on him.

Agrees with EH's remarks on Kölliker ["Darwin'sche Schöpfungstheorie",Z. Wiss. Zool. 14 (1864): 174-86].

Asks EH to thank Carl Gegenbaur [forVergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere (1864)].

See also:

'The Making of Origin' on the American Museum of Natural History'sDarwin Manuscripts Project site.

Darwin's letters: a timeline

Cambridge University Library logo
ALCS logo

University of Cambridge

© 2024 University of Cambridge

Study at Cambridge

About the University

Research at Cambridge


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp