Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Encyclopedia Britannica
Encyclopedia Britannica
SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
SUBSCRIBE
History & SocietyScience & TechBiographiesAnimals & NatureGeography & TravelArts & Culture
Ask the Chatbot Games & Quizzes History & Society Science & Tech Biographies Animals & Nature Geography & Travel Arts & Culture ProCon Money Videos
Table of Contents
References & Edit History Facts & Stats
For Students
printPrint
Please select which sections you would like to print:
verifiedCite
While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies.Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.
Select Citation Style
Feedback
Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login).
Thank you for your feedback

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Also known as: Bhārat, Bhāratavarsha, Republic of India
Last Updated:Article History

Magadha was the nucleus of the Shunga kingdom, which succeeded the Mauryan. The kingdom extended westward to includeUjjain andVidisha. The Shungas came into conflict with Vidarbha and with theYavanas, who probably were Bactrian Greeks attempting to move into the Ganges valley. (The wordyavana derives from the Prakrityona, suggesting that the Ionians were the first Greeks with whom the Persians and Indians came into contact. In later centuries the name Yavana was applied to all peoples coming from westernAsia and the Mediterranean region, which included the Romans, Persians, and Arabs.) The Shungadynasty lasted for about one century and was then overthrown by the Brahman ministerVasudeva, who founded theKanva dynasty, which lasted 45 years and following which the Magadha area was of greatly diminished importance until the 4th centuryce.

Kalinga

Kalinga rose to prominence underKharavela, dated with some debate to the 1st centurybce. Kharavela boasts, perhaps exaggeratedly for a pious Jain, of successful campaigns in the westernDeccan and against the Yavanas and Magadha and of a triumphal victory over the Pandyas of southern India.

TheAndhras and their successors

The Andhras are listed among the tribal peoples in theMauryan empire. Possibly they rose to being local officials and then, on the disintegration of the empire, gradually became independent rulers of the northwestern Deccan. It cannot beascertained for certain whether the Andhras arose in theAndhra region (i.e., the Krishna-Godavari deltas) and moved up to the northwestern Deccan or whether their settling in the delta gave it their name. There is also controversy as to whether the dynasty became independent at the end of the 3rd centurybce or at the end of the 1st centurybce. Theiralternative name,Satavahana, is presumed to be thefamily name, whereas Andhra was probably that of the tribe. It is likely that Satavahana power was established during the reign ofShatakarni I, with the borders of the kingdom reaching across the northern Deccan; subsequent to this theSatavahana dynasty suffered an eclipse in the 1st centuryce, when it was forced out of the northern Deccan by theShakas and resettled in Andhra. In the 2nd centuryce the Satavahanas reestablished their power in the northwestern Deccan, as evidenced by Shaka coins from this region overstruck with the name Gautamiputra Shatakarni. That the Andhras did not controlMalava and Ujjain is clear from the claim of the Shaka king Rudradaman to these regions. The last of the important Andhra kings wasYajnashri Shatakarni, who ruled at the end of the 2nd centuryce andasserted his authority over the Shakas. The 3rd century saw the decline of Satavahana power, as the kingdom broke into small pockets of control under various branches of the family.

The Satavahana feudatories then rose to power. The Abhiras were the successors in theNashik area. TheIksvakus succeeded in the Krishna-Guntur region. TheCutu dynasty in Kuntala (southern Maharashtra) had close connections with the Satavahanas. TheBodhis ruled briefly in the northwestern Deccan. TheBrihatphalayanas came to power at the end of the 3rd century in theMasulipatam area. In these regions the Satavahana pattern of administration continued; many of the rulers had matronymics (names derived from that of the mother or a maternal ancestor); many of the royal inscriptions record donations made to Buddhist monks and monasteries, often by princesses, and also land grants to Brahmans and the performance of Vedic sacrifices by the rulers.

Southern Indian kingdoms

Significant, historically attested contact between the north and theTamil regions can be reasonably dated to the Mauryan period. Evidence on the early history of the south consists of the epigraphs of the region, theTamilcankam (sangam) literature, and archaeological data.

Inscriptions in Brahmi (recently read as Tamil Brahmi) date to between the 2nd centurybce and the 4th centuryce. Most of the inscriptions record donations made by royalty or by merchants and artisans to Buddhist and Jain monks. These are useful incorroborating evidence from thecankam literature, a collection of a large number of poems in classical Tamil that, according to tradition, were recited at three assemblies of poets held atMadurai. Included in this literature are the Eight Anthologies (Ettutokai) and Ten Idylls (Pattupattu). The grammatical workTolkappiyam also is said to be of the same period. The literature probably belongs to the same period as the inscriptions, although some scholars suggest an earlier date. The historical authenticity of sections of thecankam literature has been confirmed by archaeological evidence.

Tamilakam, theabode of the Tamils, was defined incankam literature as approximately equivalent to the area south of present-dayChennai (Madras). Tamilakam was divided into 13nadus (districts), of which the region of Madurai was the most important as the core of the Tamil speakers. The three major chiefdoms of Tamilakam were those of thePandya dynasty (Madurai), theCeras (Cheras;Malabar Coast and the hinterland), and theColas (Cholas;Thanjavur and the Kaveri valley), founders of theCola dynasty. The inscriptions of the Pandyas, recording royal grants and other grants made by local citizens, date to the 2nd centurybce. The chiefNedunjeliyan (early 3rd centuryce) is celebrated by the poets of thecankam as the victor in campaigns against the Ceras and the Colas. Cera inscriptions of the 2nd centuryce referring to theIrrumporai clan have been found near Karur (Tiruchchirapalli district), identified with the Korura of Ptolemy.Cankam literature mentions the names of Cera chiefs who have been dated to the 1st centuryce. Among them,Nedunjeral Adan is said to have attacked the Yavana ships and held the Yavana traders to ransom. His sonShenguttuvan, much eulogized in the poems, also is mentioned in thecontext ofGajabahu’s rule inSri Lanka, which can be dated to either the first or last quarter of the 2nd centuryce, depending on whether he was the earlier or the later Gajabahu.Karikalan (late 2nd centuryce) is the best known of the early Cola chiefs and was to become almost a kind ofeponymous ancestor to many families of the south claiming Cola descent. The early capital was at Uraiyur, in an area that stretched from theVaigai River in the south to Tondaimandalam in the north. The three chiefdoms were frequently at war; in addition there were often hostilities with Sri Lanka. Mention is also made of the ruler ofTondaimandalam with its capital atKanchipuram. There is also frequent mention of the minor chieftains, theVel, who ruled small areas in many parts of the Tamilcountry. Ultimately all the chiefdoms suffered at the hands of theKalvar, or Kalabras, who came from the border to the north of Tamilakam and were described as evil rulers, but they were overthrown in the 5th centuryce with the rise of theCalukya (Chalukyas) andPallavadynasties.

Cankam literature reflects theindigenous cultural tradition as well as elements of the intrusion of the northern Sanskritic tradition, which by now was beginning to come into contact with these areas, some of which were in the process of change from chiefdoms to kingdoms. In poems praising the chiefs, heroism in raids and gift-giving are hailed as the main virtues. The predominant economy remained pastoral-cum-agrarian, with an increasing emphasis on agriculture. The Tamil poems divide the land into five ecological zones, ortinais. Among the poems that make reference to social stratification, one uses the wordkudi (“group”) to denote caste. Each village had itssabha, or council, for administering local affairs, an institution that was to remain a fixture of village life. Religious observance consisted primarily in conducting sacrifices to various deities, among whom Murugan was preeminent.

Trade with the Yavanas and with the northern parts of the subcontinent provided considerable economic momentum for the southern Indian states. Given the terrain of the peninsula and theagricultural technology of the time, large agrarian-based kingdoms like those of northern India were notfeasible, although the cultivation of rice provided a base for economic change. Inevitably, trade played more than a marginal role, and overseas trade became a major economic activity. Almost as soon as the Roman trade began to decline, the Southeast Asian trade commenced; in subsequent centuries this became the focus of maritime interest.


[8]
ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp