Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:



This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see theLibrary Active Issues List for more information and the meaning ofResolved status.

825. Missing rvalues reference stream insert/extract operators?

Section: 19.5.4.1[syserr.errcode.overview], 20.3.2.2.12[util.smartptr.shared.io], 99 [facets.examples], 22.9.4[bitset.operators], 29.4.6[complex.ops], 31.6[stream.buffers], 28.6.8[re.submatch]Status:ResolvedSubmitter: Alisdair MeredithOpened: 2008-04-10Last modified: 2017-03-21

Priority:Not Prioritized

View all otherissues in [syserr.errcode.overview].

View all issues withResolved status.

Discussion:

Addresses UK 220

Should the following use rvalues references to stream in insert/extract operators?

[Sophia Antipolis]

Agree with the idea in the issue, Alisdair to provide wording.

[Daniel adds 2009-02-14:]

The proposal given in the paperN2831apparently resolves this issue.

[Batavia (2009-05):]

The cited paper is an earlier version ofN2844,which changed the rvalue reference binding rules.That paper includes generic templatesoperator<< andoperator>>that adapt rvalue streams.

We therefore agree with Daniel's observation. Move toNAD EditorialResolved.

Proposed resolution:


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp