This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see theLibrary Active Issues List for more information and the meaning ofResolved status.
Section: 19.5.4.1[syserr.errcode.overview], 20.3.2.2.12[util.smartptr.shared.io], 99 [facets.examples], 22.9.4[bitset.operators], 29.4.6[complex.ops], 31.6[stream.buffers], 28.6.8[re.submatch]Status:ResolvedSubmitter: Alisdair MeredithOpened: 2008-04-10Last modified: 2017-03-21
Priority:Not Prioritized
View all otherissues in [syserr.errcode.overview].
View all issues withResolved status.
Discussion:
Addresses UK 220
Should the following use rvalues references to stream in insert/extract operators?
[Sophia Antipolis]
Agree with the idea in the issue, Alisdair to provide wording.
[Daniel adds 2009-02-14:]
The proposal given in the paperN2831apparently resolves this issue.
[Batavia (2009-05):]
The cited paper is an earlier version ofN2844,which changed the rvalue reference binding rules.That paper includes generic templates
operator<<andoperator>>that adapt rvalue streams.We therefore agree with Daniel's observation. Move to
NAD EditorialResolved.
Proposed resolution: