Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


SEP home page
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Notes toFallacies

1. A similar inventory of fallacies has been dubbed “the gang ofeighteen” by John Woods (1992).

2.Meditations on First Philosophy, Dedication.

3. ‘Deduction’ has replaced ‘syllogism’ as theway to translate ‘sullogismos’. See Corcoran (1974), Smith(1997), and Irwin and Fine (1996).

4. Whately (1875) has an extensive Appendix of 50 pages discussing 30 ormore terms “peculiarly liable to be used ambiguously.”

5. Accident, converse accident andpetitio principii were notincluded in the first edition of Copi’sIntroduction toLogic, 1953.

6. Govier (1987) and Johnson (1989) have questioned the significance ofthe asymmetry thesis for informal logic.

7. See Govier (1988), Freeman (1988).

8. The scheme that Walton prefers is much more complicated (2010, 168)but the present abbreviated version serves to illustrate the role ofcritical questions.

9. At (2010, 179) Walton says that a fallacy is an argument that seemsto be correct but is not (echoing Copi).

10. Defenders of SDF include Salmon (1963) and Powers (1995).

Copyright © 2024 by
Hans Hansen<hhansen@uwindsor.ca>

Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative.
The Encyclopedia Now Needs Your Support
Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free

Browse

About

Support SEP

Mirror Sites

View this site from another server:

USA (Main Site)Philosophy, Stanford University

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy iscopyright © 2024 byThe Metaphysics Research Lab, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University

Library of Congress Catalog Data: ISSN 1095-5054


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp