Theological Insights into the Notion of Order in Physics and the Natural Sciences.Timothy Rogers -manuscriptdetailsAn exploration of the metaphysics of process-ordering in Quantum Theory and Relativity Theory that is guided by Bohm, Peirce, Levinas, and Torrance.
The biological cell as a living symbol of a natural kind: Bridging evolutionary process and physical determination through dynamical holism.Timothy M. Rogers -manuscriptdetailsAn exploration of the foundational paradox between Newton’s classical mechanics and Darwin’s theory of evolution, focusing on their divergent conceptions of time—static determinism versus dynamic generation. Drawing on biosemiotics, a formal model of interacting biological cells is proposed that combines Newton’s formal determinism and Darwin’s agentic selection. The study introduces a relational ontology involving hypostatically mediated category differences, where genetic text serves as both a material index for the determination of particular individuals and a symbolic label for the communally enacted (...) natural kind. By integrating the determination of lawful formation and the indetermination of communal resonance, the paper advances a novel framework, embedded in physical theory, for understanding biological formation, spatiotemporal continuity, and the semiotic logic of category theory. (shrink)
How is a relational ontology formally relational? A phenomenological exploration of the semiotic logic of agency in physics, mathematics and biology.Timothy M. Rogers -manuscriptdetailsA phenomenological exploration of the distinction between a relational formal ontology (also called a process ontology) and a classical formal ontology (also called an object ontology) for modelling physical phenomena that exhibit relationally-mediated holism, such as phenomena from quantum physics and biosemiotics. Whereas a classical formal ontology is based on mathematical objects and classes, a relational formal ontology is based on mathematical signs and categories. A relational formal ontology involves nodal networks that are dynamically sustained through signalling. Nodal networks are (...) systems of constrained iterative processes (dynamical nodes) that have individual semiotic agency within a matrix of determinate possibilities (a semiotic scaffolding). The nodal networks are hierarchically ordered and exhibit characteristics of deep learning. Clarifying the distinction between classical and relational formal ontologies may help to clarify the role of interpretative context in physics (eg. the role of the observer in quantum theory), the role of signalling in biological systems and the role of hierarchical nodal networks in computational simulations of learning in generative artificial intelligence (AI). Two experiments are conducted to explore the application of key principles of relational ontology in AI, namely, complex pattern abduction involving hierarchies of categories and progressive determination through placeholder signs. (shrink)
How does the semiotic logic of AI work? A recursive dialogue withMicrosoft Copilot.Timothy M. Rogers -manuscriptdetailsIf you have ever wondered how AI works and are interested in semiotics, logic, or ethical implications of AI, then you may find this dialogue to be quite interesting. [Note: this is not a paper; it is a verbatim transcript of a dialogue with AI].
The six types of sign action.Hugo F. Alrøe -forthcoming -Semiotica.detailsThe Peircean doctrine of signs is incomplete. This paper rethinks the standard model of sign action to provide a common framework for analyzing all the different kinds of semiotic processes, including the workings of thinking creatures, sentient beings, single cell organisms, social systems, and sciences. Through a detailed theoretical analysis, the paper shows how we can separate mediation (featuring the steps: source, mediator, and outcome) from representation (featuring the conventional sign correlates: object, sign, and interpretant) in Peircean semiotics and combine (...) the two to establish a general model of sign action. This leads to the fundamental and, in a Peircean context, somewhat controversial ideas that there are not two but three dynamical sign correlates and, notably, that there is not one direction of mediation in the sign triad, but six directions, which constitute six fundamental types of sign action: perceiving, acting, interpreting, expressing, sensing, and reacting. The sixfold model of sign action is a step toward a general theory of semiosis, it promises to reconcile the split in biosemiotics, and it provides a coherent semiotic foundation for a general theory of observation in science. Chiefly, it offers a workable framework for semiotics. (shrink)
Pragmatism and the Problem of Reason in Nature: Meaning, Naturalism, and the Threat of Semantic Nihilism.Brandon Beasley -forthcoming - London and New York: Routledge.detailsThis book argues that pragmatism offers a solution to a fundamental problem in the philosophy of language and mind: namely, the problem of the place of conceptual meanings—and so human minds—in nature. It contends that a pragmatist approach to resolving the problem avoids the dual traps of either reductionist elimination of genuine meanings or rationalist metaphysical excess. The current intellectual, scientific, and cultural landscape is dominated by scientism, reductionism, and scepticism about such things as values, meanings, and everything that seems (...) to make human life worth living. What, then, is the role of conceptual meanings in what makes human beings unique and important? This book contends that the true nature and depth of this problem is central to pragmatism, and that pragmatism offers the resources to overcome it. First, it demonstrates that radical semantic indeterminacy poses a real danger for all attempts to naturalize human mindedness. The author argues that meaning-destroying indeterminacy is a constant threat of attempts to naturalize meaning and mind, and that centring this aspect of the problem in constructing a version of pragmatism means that we will pay attention to it and thus avoid it, creating a more successful pragmatist approach to the problem of meaning and mind in nature. Second, the book shows that by paying close attention to the relation of meaning and habit in pragmatism, we can identify the threat of indeterminacy in existing pragmatisms and then rectify the problem by putting forward a better account of the relation of meaning and that does not face the threat of radical indeterminacy. (shrink)
Remove from this list
Export citation
Bookmark
1 citation What’s in a face? Making sense of tangible information systems in terms of Peircean semiotics.Paul Beynon-Davies -forthcoming -European Journal of Information Systems 27 (3):295-314.detailsWithin this paper, we utilise a delimited area of philosophy to help make sense of a delimited area of design science as it pertains to a class of contemporary information systems. The philosophy is taken from that of Charles Sanders Peirce; the design science is directed at the construction of visual devices in that area known as visual management. The utilisation of such devices within their wider visual management systems we take to be instances of what we refer to as (...) tangible information systems. Tangible information systems use tangible artefacts, such as whiteboards and magnetic tokens, to accomplish information. We particularly use Peircean semiotics to analyse the use of tangible emoticons articulated upon performance boards within a large-scale manufacturing facility. We infer from our analysis of these informative artefacts that certain integrated aspects of Peircean philosophy offers an alternative way of framing notions of a proper design science, design theory and design artefact for the discipline of information systems. (shrink)
The Structure of C. S. Peirce's Neglected Argument for the Reality of God: A Critical Assessment.ClantonJ Caleb -forthcoming -.detailsDespite the attention it has received in recent years, C. S. Peirce's so-called neglected argument for God's reality remains somewhat obscure. The aim of this essay is to clarify the basic structure of Peirce's three-part argument and to show how it falls prey to several objections. I argue that his overall argument is ultimately unsuccessful in demonstrating the reality of God, even if it provides some degree of warrant for the belief in God's reality to those who are uncontrollably drawn (...) to that belief during the process of musement. (shrink)
Bayesianism and the Inferential Solution to Hume’s Problem.Chloé de Canson -forthcoming -Philosophers' Imprint.detailsI examine Howson’s alluring suggestion that Bayesianism, by supplying a logic of inductive inference—conditionalisation—solves the problem of induction. I draw on his historical heritage, especially Hume, Peirce, and Ramsey, to reconstruct the interpretation of the problem of induction that his remarks intimates. Roughly, it is that of how to amend the system with which one meets the world, in the light of new particulars. Unfortunately, his claim that conditionalisation constitutes a solution to this problem, I argue, fails by his own (...) lights, because it turns on the widely endorsed but nonetheless erroneous contention that a justification of conditionalisation qua rule of inference can be given independently from a justification of the priors. (shrink)
The Virtual isn’t Real.Marc Champagne -forthcoming -Disputatio.detailsThe suggestion that we might live in a giant computer simulation seems plausible in large part because the hypothetical sophistication of the hypothetical simulation can be increased to meet almost any objection. From an engineering standpoint, the technological increases required by this strategy may not always be feasible. Proceeding nevertheless from an idealization, David Chalmers argues that the virtual objects and worlds displayed in perfect and permanent computer simulations could be regarded as real because, on those terms (perfection and permanence), (...) our own world could just as well be virtual. I counter that real reality, or RR, possesses (at least) five features that no VR simulation could ever reproduce: RR involves genuinely causal regularities, it is older than any machine, it will outlast any machine, it supports living bodies in ways that cannot be replaced, and thus belongs to an entirely different category than artifacts. These differences are especially robust, since they all grant the possibility of present-moment indistinguishability while halting any collapse or blurring of the virtual/real distinction. (shrink)
Pragmatism and academic freedom: the university as intellectual experiment station from Humboldt to Peirce and Dewey.Shannon Dea -forthcoming - In Robert Lane,Pragmatism Revisited. Cambridge University Press.detailsCharles Sanders Peirce and John Dewey’s thinking on universities, their function, and what is required in support of that function was deeply influenced by University of Berlin founder Wilhelm von Humboldt’s reform of the Prussian educational system. This chapter traces that influence and describes Dewey’s role as one of the founders of the modern American conception of academic freedom. It concludes with a consideration of threats posed to universities and academic freedom by authoritarianism, and possible responses to those threats offered (...) by Peirce and Dewey. (shrink)
“Pragmatism’s Family Feud: Peirce, James and the Spirit of 1872”.Jackman Henry -forthcoming - In Scott Aikin and Robert Talisse,Routledge Companion to Pragmatism. Routledge.detailsWhile William James and Charles Sanders Peirce are considered the two fathers of American Pragmatism, Peircian Pragmatism is often being presented as the comparatively ‘objective’ alternative to metaphysical realism, with the Jamesian version being castigated as an overly ‘subjective’ departure from Peirce’s position. However, while James clearly does put more of an emphasis on ‘subjective’ factors than does Peirce, his doing so is often the result of his simply drawing out consequences of the framework that Peirce presented in an 1872 (...) meeting of their ‘Metaphysical Club’ where James and Peirce famously discussed the core ideas that have been associated with pragmatism ever since. In particular, while Peirce was still flirting with idealism at the time, James drew out some of the consequences that followed from those 1872 discussion once they were placed more firmly in a naturalistic, particularly Darwinian, framework. Peirce was never comfortable with these consequences, and in later work tried to distance himself from a number of positions defended in his earlier papers. James, by contrast, never rejected that early framework, which resulted in the increasing differences between the versions of pragmatism developed by the two. These differences show up most clearly in their conflicting conceptions of both when our beliefs are rationally justified, and what it would take for those beliefs to be true. (shrink)
Topos de Gráficos Existenciales sobre Superficies de Riemann.Angie Hugueth -forthcoming -X Jornadas de Peirce En Argentina - Universidad de Navarra.detailsLos gráficos existenciales de Peirce proveen un entendimiento geométrico de una variedad de lógicas (clásica, intuicionista, modal, primer orden). La interpretación geométrica se da en el plano, pero puede ser extendida a otras superficies (esfera, cilindro, toro, etc.) Yendo más allá, se pueden dibujar gráficos existenciales sobre superficies de Riemann arbitrarias, y, con la introducción de herramientas de geometría algebraica (haces, topos de Grothendieck, topos elementales), se pueden capturar las lógicas emergentes vía un nuevo Topos de Gráficos Existenciales sobre Superficies (...) de Riemann y su clasificador de subobjetos. Ofrecemos algunas perspectivas (conceptos, definiciones, ejemplos, conjeturas) a lo largo de ese camino. (shrink)
Semantic Contents and Pragmatic Perspectives: The Social and the Real in Brandom and Peirce.Vitaly Kiryushchenko -forthcoming -Pragmatism Today.detailsThis paper compares Charles Peirce’s and Robert Brandom’s conceptions of normative objectivity. According to Brandom, discursive norms are instituted by practical attitudes of the members of a community, and yet the objectivity of these norms is not reducible to social consensus. Peirce’s conception of normative objectivity, on the contrary, is rooted in his idea of a community of inquiry, which presupposes a consensus achievable in the long run. The central challenge in both cases is to explain how the norms that (...) all members of a community take to be correct differ from those that are correct objectively. I argue that, in meeting the challenge of reconciling the social character of knowledge and the objectivity of norms shared by a community of knowers, Brandom’s approach might benefit from the Peircean idea of the ultimate agreement. (shrink)
Remove from this list
Export citation
Bookmark
The role of sentiment, aesthetic behavior, and narrative semiosis in the identification of selfhood from Peirce’s semiotic perspective.Yunhee Lee -forthcoming -Semiotica.detailsBy means of Peirce’s categorial method, this paper explores the selfhood identified in sign activity from two dimensions of semiotic agency: the practical and the theoretical. The paper considers the intelligibility of aesthetic value co-existing with Thirdness and the ethical implications of narrativity in selfhood. Peirce’s phenomenological category of Firstness, as a poetics of possibility, interplays with Secondness, of actuality, in the experience of the sense of other and the self in narrative. Then Thirdness mediates the sense of other with (...) the sense of the self, seeking generality of feeling. As a vital matter in the conduct of moral life, the survival value of not solely enhancing survival which characterizes aesthetic behavior in the human animal, the role of sentiment in morality, and the poetics of the will with its moral capacity in narrative semiosis, are investigated in the paper. Thus, a pragmatic inquiry into the self, along with a developmental approach, will illustrate three phases of the self: aesthetic behavior in the biosemiotic self; value-driven dynamics in the agentive self; and ethical implications in the narrative self. The analysis will take the Korean science fiction film, Jung-E, as a case study to illustrate the two dimensions of semiotic agency. (shrink)
Peirce and Generative AI.Catherine Legg -forthcoming - In Robert Lane,Pragmatism Revisited. Cambridge University Press.detailsEarly artificial intelligence research was dominated by intellectualist assumptions, producing explicit representation of facts and rules in “good old-fashioned AI”. After this approach foundered, emphasis shifted to deep learning in neural networks, leading to the creation of Large Language Models which have shown remarkable capacity to automatically generate intelligible texts. This new phase of AI is already producing profound social consequences which invite philosophical reflection. This paper argues that Charles Peirce’s philosophy throws valuable light on genAI’s capabilities first with regard (...) to meaning, then knowledge and truth. Firstly, I explore how Peirce’s icon/index/symbol distinction illuminates the functioning of genAI. I argue that genAI’s engineers have skilfully captured a form of symbolicity, but no other sign-kind. In lacking indexical signs, LLMs lack connection with, and accountability to, particular worldly objects. In lacking iconic signs, LLMs are insufficiently disciplined by structural – most notably logical – relationships. Then I argue that GenAI’s astounding stream of articulate, truth-semblant, yet worthless texts issues a timely reckoning to modern philosophy’s representational realism. By contrast, Peirce’s pragmatism scaffolds a rich relational realism (Gili and Maddalena 2022), which shows how meaningful concepts, and a grasp of truth, can only occur across multiple cognitive systems who are simultaneously richly related with one another, and a shared environment in which they continually act and receive feedback, within a logical space of reasons. As Peirce himself noted, “Mere knowledge, though it be systematized, may be a dead memory; while by science we all habitually mean a living and growing body of truth”. (shrink)
Sellars and Peirce on Truth and the End of Inquiry.Catherine Legg -forthcoming - In Carl Sachs,Interpreting Sellars: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.detailsDespite some notable similarities between the scientific realisms of Sellars and Peirce (such as both being anti-representationalist, and future-directed), in his mature work Science and Metaphysics Sellars explicitly critiqued Peirce’s account of truth, as lacking “an intelligible foundation” (Sellars 1968: vii). In this paper, I explore Sellars’ proposed remedy to Peirce’s purported lack, in his complex and enigmatic account of picturing – a non-discursive ‘mapping’ of the world. I argue that although Sellars’ development of this idea is largely sound, much (...) of what he charges Peirce’s philosophy with missing is actually present there. By means of his semiotic icon / index / symbol distinction, Peirce manages to develop a philosophy of language which effectively coordinates the real order and the order of signification within the very structure of the proposition as he understands it, by contrast to Sellars’ claim that the two orders are merely connected through ‘analogy’. I also argue that in between Sellars’ ambitious account of veridicality, which appears to anticipate a form of scientific self-mensuration, and the dismissive ‘anti-truth’ quietism of neopragmatists such as Rorty, Peirce’s “contrite fallibilism” (Peirce CP 1.14) charts a wise middle path. (shrink)
Concepts in Pragmatism.Catherine Legg -forthcoming - In Stephan Schmid & Hamid Taieb,A Philosophical History of the Concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.detailsPragmatism is a philosophical tradition that understands knowing the world as inseparable from agency within it. It thereby introduces some unique ideas and approaches to the analysis of concepts. Looking largely to pragmatism’s founder, Charles Peirce, this chapter presents an account of concepts as habits which associate specific kinds of environmental stimuli with schemata of action and ensuing experience, within linguistic communities. I explain how this account avoids Sellars’ ‘Myth of the Given’. I then explore how Peirce’s semiotic approach to (...) philosophy of language and mind theorized signifying habits as symbols which draw icons and indices together into propositional structures, thereby generating meanings that are specifically applicable and indefinitely generalizable. This original account of concept formation is further illuminated through an examination of Peirce’s philosophy of perception, which makes particularly manifest the process whereby primitive indices, or ‘percepts’, are enfolded in symbolic meanings through habitual ‘perceptual judgements’. (shrink)
The Many Faces of Pragmaticism: Semiotics as a Bridge Between Science, Philosophy, and Religion.O. Lehto -forthcoming - In Amir Biglari,Open Semiotics. Paris: L'Harmattan.detailsReconciling the many “faces” of Peirce – the Scientist, Philosopher, and Metaphysician - helps to make sense of the open-endedness and versatility of semiotics. Semiosis, for Peirce, knows no rigid hermeneutic or disciplinary bounds. It thus forces us to be open to interdisciplinary and holistic inquiries. The pragmatic maxim sets limits on metaphysical speculation, but it also legitimates the extension of the experimentalist method into cosmological, metaphysical, and even religious domains. Although Peirce's religious speculations are ultimately unsatisfactory, understanding why Peirce (...) expanded his thinking to such domains reveals the expansionist logic of Peircean semiotics beyond the mere idiosyncracies of the man. The triadic, dynamic logic of pragmatist inquiry seeks to expand to all social processes of fixing belief and forming habits, however quixotic; but it remains dubious whether such expansion can fully comport to the scientific, experimentalist method that Peirce preferred. (shrink)
How To Do Things With Signs: Semiotics in Legal Theory, Practice, and Education.Harold Anthony Lloyd -forthcoming -University of Richmond Law Review.detailsNote: This draft was updated on November 10, 2020. Discussing federal statutes, Justice Scalia tells us that “[t]he stark reality is that the only thing that one can say for sure was agreed to by both houses and the president (on signing the bill) is the text of the statute. The rest is legal fiction." How should we take this claim? If we take "text" to mean the printed text, that text without more is just a series of marks. If (...) instead we take "text" (as we must) to refer to something off the page such as the "meaning" of the series of marks at issue, what is that meaning and how do we know that all the legislators "agreed" on that "meaning"? In seeking answers here, we necessarily delve into semiotics (i.e., the “general theory of signs”) by noting that meaningful ink marks ("signifiers) signify a meaning beyond themselves (the "signified.") Thus, understanding how signs function is integral to lawyers' textual and linguistic analysis. Additionally, as this article demonstrates, legal analysis and rhetoric are much impoverished if lawyers ignore nonverbal signs such as icons, indices, and nonverbal symbols. In providing a broad overview of semiotics for lawyers, this article thus (1) begins with a general definition of signs and the related notion of intentionality. It then turns to, among other things, (2) the structure and concomitants of signs in more detail (including the signifier and the signified), (3) the possible correlations of the signifier and the signified that generate signs of interest to lawyers such as the index, the icon, and the symbol; (5) the expansion of legal rhetoric through use of the index, the icon, and the non-verbal as well as the verbal symbol, (6) the nature of various semiotic acts in public and private law (including assertives, commissives, directives, and verdictives); (7) the interpretation and construction of semiotic acts (including contracts as commissives and legislation as directives); (8) the role of speaker or reader meaning in the interpretation and construction of semiotic acts; (9) the semiotics of meaning, time, and the fixation of meaning debate; (10) the impact of signifier drift; (11) the distinction between sense and understanding; and (12) some brief reflections on semiotics and the First Amendment. This article also provides an Appendix of further terms and concepts useful to lawyers in their explorations of semiotics. (shrink)
Language Models’ Hall of Mirrors Problem: Why AI Alignment Requires Peircean Semiosis (2nd edition).David Manheim -forthcoming -Philosophy and Technology.detailsThis paper examines some limitations of large language models (LLMs) through the framework of Peircean semiotics. We argue that basic LLMs exist within a "hall of mirrors," manipulating symbols without indexical grounding or participation in socially-mediated epistemology. We then argue that newer developments, including extended context windows, persistent memory, and mediated interactions with reality, are moving towards making newer Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems into genuine Peircean interpretants, and conclude that LLMs may be approaching this goal, and no fundamental barriers exist. (...) This lens reframes a central challenge for AI alignment: without grounding in the semiotic process, a models’ linguistic encoding of goals may diverge from real-world values. By synthesizing Peirce's pragmatic view of signs, contemporary discussions of AI alignment, and recent work on relational realism, we illustrate a fundamental epistemological and practical challenge to AI safety and point to part of a solution. (shrink)
The Effect of Peirce's Philosophical Position on His Understanding of the Sign.Şeyma Gülsüm Önder -forthcoming -Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi:185-210.detailsGöstergenin bilimsel olarak incelenme sürecinde etkin rol oynayan zihinsel arka plan farklılığı, temel unsurlarının şekil ve formlarında görülen değişiklikler başta olmak üzere, gösterme eyleminin işlevi ve gayesine ilişkin birtakım görüş ayrılıklarına zemin hazırlar. Nitekim göstergebilimin kurucuları Ferdinand de Saussure ve C. S. Peirce, göstergeyi birbirinden farklı iki bağlamda ele alır. Saussure göstergebilimin, dilbilimi de içine alan bir bilim dalı olarak kurulması gerekliliğine değinmekle yetinirken Peirce, onu, mantık ve anlam-yorum çalışmalarına hız kazandırmak amacı ile bilimsel zemine taşır. Peirce’ün göstergeye bakışı, yalnızca (...) işaret olgusuna dair geliştirdiği bir teori olarak değil; ayrıca bir anlam ve bilgi teorisi olarak da incelenmelidir. Bu nedenle makalenin ilk bölümünde Peirce’ün mantık alanındaki düşüncelerinin alt yapısını oluşturan varlık kategorilerine yer verilecektir. Ardından onun pragmatisizm düşüncesi ve klasik mantık eleştirisi üzerinden göstergeye ve işaret ettiği anlama bakışı değerlendirilecektir. Üçüncü bölümde ise gösterge teorisi, detaylı olarak incelenecek; Peirce’ün felsefî pozisyonun semiyozis terimleri üzerindeki belirleyici etkisine değinilecektir. The difference in mental background, which plays an active role in the scientific analysis of the sign, paves the way for some disagreements regarding the function and purpose of the act of signifying, especially the changes in the shapes and forms of its basic elements. As a matter of fact, the founders of semiotics, Ferdinand de Saussure and C. S. Peirce, consider the sign in two different contexts. While Saussure is content to mention the necessity of establishing semiotics as a branch of science that also includes linguistics, Peirce carries it to the scientific ground with the aim of accelerating the logic and meaning-interpretation studies. Peirce, who developed his own categories of entities, deals with them in three stages. These; firstness, in which the entity is a pure quality before it exists in the world, secondness, in other words, the form in which this quality is embodied outside; and the thirdness, in other words, the state in question, which has gained the ability to serve as a representation in order to appeal to a mind and be interpreted. In this last category, being becomes an interpretable sign that points to an object for a certain meaning. The point where the categories of being and Peirce's theory of sign meet is that the types of sign, object and interpretant are shaped according to these three categories. (shrink)
Peirce’s Universal Categories in the S 3 symmetry group: an analysis of the basic color terms.John S. Robertson -forthcoming -Semiotica.detailsIn their landmark 1969 study, Berlin and Kay challenged the longstanding assumption that each language had its own distinct color terminology. Instead, they posited that a core set of eleven basic color terms (or a subset thereof) are consistently recognized across languages globally. Although these basic color terms have largely endured over time, the underlying reason for this specific set of terms has remained elusive. This paper proposes an explanation grounded in the logical interconnections between C. S. Peirce’s Universal Categories, (...) the geometric algebra of S3 symmetry transformations, and the spectral and saturation characteristics of color. It posits that this methodological framework, through a rigorous logical progression, accounts for the generation of each of the eleven basic color terms identified by Berlin and Kay, offering a systematic explanation for the universality observed in color naming through time and space. (shrink)
The structure of intentionality. Insights and challenges for enactivism.Pierre Steiner -forthcoming -Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.detailsThe purpose of the paper is twofold. It first aims at clarifying and developing an important tension within enactivism concerning the relations between intentionality and content, once representationalism has been abandoned. In which sense(s) do enactivists (still) say that intentionality is contentful and not contentful? Secondly, it puts this tension in perspective with two paradigmatic ways of defining the relations between intentional states and their objects: Husserl’s theory of intentionality in the Logical Investigations, and Charles Sanders Peirce’s triadic semiotics.
An Integrated Account of Rosen’s Relational Biology and Peirce’s Semiosis. Part I: Components and Signs, Final Cause and Interpretation.Federico Vega -forthcoming -Biosemiotics:1-20.detailsRobert Rosen’s relational biology and biosemiotics share the claim that life cannot be explained by the laws that apply to the inanimate world alone. In this paper, an integrated account of Rosen’s relational biology and Peirce’s semiosis is proposed. The ultimate goal is to contribute to the construction of a unified framework for the definition and study of life. The relational concepts of component and mapping, and the semiotic concepts of sign and triadic relation are discussed and compared, and a (...) representation of semiotic relations with mappings is proposed. The role of the final cause in two theories that account for what differentiates living beings, natural selection and relational biology, is analyzed. Then the presence of the final cause in Peirce’s semiosis is discussed and, with it, the similarities and differences between the theories of Rosen and Peirce are deepened. Then, a definition of a semiotic relation in an organism is proposed, and Short’s definition of interpretation is applied. Finally, a method to identify and analyze semiotic actions in an organism is proposed. (shrink)
(1 other version)Existential import and Peirce’s early realism about universals: the True Gorgias.Richard Kenneth Atkins &T. Starling Reid -2025 -British Journal for the History of Philosophy 33 (5):1143-1164.detailsPeirce’s True Gorgias is a brief dialogue from his essay “Grounds of Validity of the Laws of Logic”, published in 1869. The True Gorgias exposes the fallacy of existential import. It has received no sustained attention in the secondary literature, perhaps because the fallacy is now familiar. Peirce’s assessment of the fallacy involved in the reasoning, however, changes between 1865 and 1869, and he only arrives at the contemporary account of existential import in 1880. Moreover, a careful examination of the (...) context in which the True Gorgias appears reveals it provides an argument in support of Peirce’s early Aristotelian realism about universals in contradistinction to non-Aristotelian varieties of realism advocated by W.T. Harris, editor of the journal in which the True Gorgias was published. (shrink)
Propositional shortcomings in modeling of the future in the context of ch.s. Peirce’s pragmatism: Based on postconflict scenarios.Svitlana Balinchenko -2025 -Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 1:192-207.detailsCh.S. Peirce in 1902–1905 publications, in particular, “What is Pragmatism?” (in The Monist), while explaining the essentials of pragmatism, defines belief as a state of a self-satisfied habit, in contrast with doubt as the privation of habit, the state that tends to be a condition to erratic activity. Moreover, Ch.S. Peirce points out that the possibilities and limitations of probability description and assessment can be realized in future actions only, as they denote the sphere of practice in which it is (...) possible to develop self-control through self-preparation, employing belief and doubt, for subsequent reflection excluding the possibility of self-reproach. The pragmatistic tools for assessing and modeling future practical consequences have been integrated into modern theoretical approaches predicting crisis changes in social reality. Therefore, this paper is intended to evoke a discussion in the philosophical community on the idea of applying the pragmatistic tools of belief, and doubt, and assigning meaning to the scenarios characterized by uncertain chronological boundaries and deferred consequences, for instance, the scenarios of postconflict future suggested during the phases of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Peirce’s belief-doubt dichotomy is transformed into a dynamic modal scale of Belief – Prediction –Expectation – Supposition – Doubt (B(PES)D) and applied to evaluate the propositional adaptability of scenarios to the unpredictable duration of future challenges, as well as the individual and collective resilience resource necessary to obtain the expected practical results in the war-affected communities. Thus, the paper is focused on the pre-2022 social and economic scenarios for the of the occupied territories reintegration, with attention paid to the changes triggered by the full-scale Russian invasion, as well as propositional adaptation of scenarios to the changed definition of realities due to large-scale migration processes and security risks of genocide and loss of subjectivity, actualized during this phase of the war. The study has employed secondary analysis of survey and statistical data from open sources for the period of armed aggression, as well as the analysis of scientific publications, official documents, and reports, to define the propositional limitations of long-term modeling embedded in practical discourses, as well as the influence of the concept of justice on the assessment of the future model in crisis conditions, within the framework of the refined belief-doubt scale (B(PES)D). (shrink)