Oh, i'm sorry.  I'd like this raised as an issue and an ideal resolutionwould be to add this as a requirement.Dave> -----Original Message-----> From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com]> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:13 AM> To: Jean-Jacques Moreau; David Orchard> Cc:www-ws-desc@w3.org> Subject: RE: Marking WSDL operations as "safe", in scope requirement?> > > Pinging David Orchard again, we're unsure whether to treat > this as a new> issue.> > > -----Original Message-----> > From:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]> On> > Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 6:58 AM> > To: David Orchard> > Cc:www-ws-desc@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Marking WSDL operations as "safe", in scope > requirement?> > > > > > David,> > > > This issue was briefly discussed before [3], but did not (yet?) make> it> > into the issues list.> > > > Are you raising this as a new issue?> > > > Jean-Jacques.> > > > [3]> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Jun/0013.html>> > > > David Orchard wrote:> > > > > I haven't been able to tell from the drafts, and my apologies for> that,> > > whether WSDL 2.0 supports marking operations as "safe" or not.  I> think> > this> > > hasn't been addressed yet in the bindings work, but I could be> wrong.> > I> > > don't quite see this as a standalone requirement in [1] > though R125> > comes> > > close.  Is there intention to support this as part of the bindings> work?> > >> > > As background, I ask this as this was a suggestion of the > TAG in the> TAG> > > issue 7 finding [2].  The extracted text is "However, to represent> > safety in> > > a more straightforward manner, it should be a property of > operations> > > themselves, not just a feature of bindings."> > >> > > FWIW, I have also heard some customers want this functionality as> they> > don't> > > have a standardized "ping" message so they want to use a safe> request> > and> > > need a way of knowing.> > >> > > Cheers,> > > Dave> > > [1]http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/> > > [2]http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet.html> > > >