Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the shear yield behaviour of polymers

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The torsional stress-strain behaviour of isotropic poly(methylmethacrylate) (P M M A), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (P E T) and polyethylene has been studied under hydrostatic pressures up to 7 kbar. In P M M A the following important features were observed. First, there is a monotonic increase in the initial slope of the stress-strain curve with increasing pressure. Secondly, there is a substantial increase in the yield stress and the strain to yield as pressure is raised. Thirdly, there is a transition in the mode of failure at elevated pressure, the specimens fracturing in the high pressure region before a drop in stress occurs. Finally, in the high pressure region the fracture stress increases with increasing pressure but the strain at fracture decreases.

The observed yield behaviour can be represented formally in a number of ways, and the results will therefore be discussed accordingly, in an attempt to give a general yield criterion for P M M A. The fracture behaviour has been analysed in terms of the Griffith ideas for fracture of glassy materials, and this will also be discussed.

The results for poly(ethylene terephthalate) (Arnite) differ significantly from those for P M M A. Specimens of Arnite as received from the manufacturers were ductile in torsion at atmospheric pressure, and the torsional yield stress rose monotonically with increasing hydrostatic pressure. Annealing the specimens produced embrittlement at atmospheric pressure, but on testing under conditions where there is no tensile component of stress (i.e. at very low hydrostatic pressures) ductile behaviour was observed.

The contrast between P M M A and Arnite suggests that in the former case there aresurface flaws which are penetrated by the hydraulic fluid at high pressures, whereas in the latter caseinternal flaws are produced by annealing.

Polyethylene remained ductile over the complete pressure range, with a pressure dependence of the tensile yield stress which was similar to that shown by polyethylene terephthalate.

This is a preview of subscription content,log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. S. B. Ainbinder, M. G. Laka, andI. Yu. Maiors,Mekhanika Polimerov1 (1965) 65.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Whitney andR. D. Andrews,J. Polymer Sci.C16 (1967) 2981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. B. Bowden andJ. A. Jukes,J. Mater. Sci.3 (1968) 183.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. D. Pae, D. R. Mears, andJ. A. Sauer,Polymer Lett.6 (1968) 773.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Biglione, E. Baer, andS. V. Radcliffe, Paper presented at Brighton Conference on Fracture (April, 1969).

  6. K. D. Pae andD. R. Mears,J. Polymer Sci.B6 (1968) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Holliday, J. Mann, G. Pogany, H. D. Pugh, andD. A. Green,Nature202 (1964) 381.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Brown andI. M. Ward,J. Polymer Sci.6 (1968) 607.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Brown, R. A. Duckett, andI. M. Ward,Phil. Mag.18 (1968) 483.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. M. Stearne andI. M. Ward,J. Mater. Sci.4 (1969) 1088.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Crossland,Proc. IME168 (1954) 935.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. M. Kaye, andJ. M. Roberts, Honours B.Sc. Report No. 68/46 (1968) Mechanical Engineering Dept, University of Bristol.

  13. Th. Von Karman,Z. Ver. dtsch. Ing.55 (1911) 1749.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Boker, Dissertation, Tech. Hochschule zu Aachen, “The Mechanics of Plastic Deformation in Crystalline Bodies”.

  15. P. W. Bridgman,J. Appl. Phys.18 (1947) 246; “Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture with special emphasis on the effects of hydrostatic pressure” (McGraw-Hill, London and New York, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Crossland andW. H. Deardon,Proc. IME172 (1958) 805.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Beardmore,Phil. Mag, in press.

  18. A. A. Griffith,Phil. Trans.221 (1921) 163.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. J. Benbow andF. C. Roesler,Proc. Phys. Soc.B70 (1957) 201.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. P. Berry, “Fracture Processes in Polymeric Solids” (Wiley, New York, 1964) pp. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. L. Smith,J. Polymer Sci.32 (1958) 99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. S. Rabinowitz

    Present address: Metallurgy Department, Scientific Research Staff, Ford Motor Company, PO Box 2053, Dearborn, Michigan, USA

  2. I. M. Ward

    Present address: Department of Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England

Authors and Affiliations

  1. H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    S. Rabinowitz & I. M. Ward

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    J. S. C. Parry

Authors
  1. S. Rabinowitz

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. M. Ward

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. S. C. Parry

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

1 bar=105 N/m−2

Rights and permissions

About this article

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Advertisement


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp