Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


AFROAVES II

ACCIPITRIMORPHAE: Cathartiformes, Accipitriformes

Afroaves

Coliiformes

Accipitrimorphae

Strigiformes

Picimorphae

Leptosomiformes

Trogoniformes

Bucerotiformes

Coraciiformes

Piciformes

The 47 Orders

Palaeognathae

Galloanserae

Mirandornithes

Columbaves

Otidimorphae

Columbimorphae

Elementaves

Opisthocomimorphae

Gruimorphae

Ardeae

Strisores

Telluraves

Afroaves

Australaves

ACCIPITRIMORPHAEVieillot, 1816

CATHARTIFORMESCoues, 1884

Although New World vultures are rather similar to Old World Vultures (part ofAccipitridae), they are not closely related. This was already recognized byHuxley in 1876 based on morphological evidence. Nonetheless, they weretraditionally placed in Falconiformes, as where the Accipitridae and Falconidae.There are also some superficial similarities to storks, and when Sibley and Ahlquistfound support for this using DNA hybridization techniques, they were removedfrom Falconiformes and placed next to the storks. More recent analysis haveshown this is incorrect, and have also broken up Falconiformes. As mentioned above,more recent research (e.g., Hackett et al., 2008; Han et al., 2011;McCormack et al., 2013; Yuri et al., 2013; Jarvis et al., 2014) puts the New World vultures close to the Accipitriformes.

Cathartidae tree

The phylogeny of Cathartidae is based on Johnson et al. (2016).

Cathartidae: New World Vulturesde Lafresnaye, 1839

5 genera, 7 speciesHBW-2

  1. Andean Condor,Vultur gryphus
  2. California Condor,Gymnogyps californianus
  3. King Vulture,Sarcoramphus papa
  4. Black Vulture,Coragyps atratus
  5. Turkey Vulture,Cathartes aura
  6. Lesser Yellow-headed Vulture,Cathartes burrovianus
  7. Greater Yellow-headed Vulture,Cathartes melambrotus

ACCIPITRIFORMESVieillot, 1816

Those interested in ancient raptors should readDarren Naish's post on Titan-Hawks.

The Secretarybird is the first branch of Accipitriformes, followed bythe Osprey. After that, come the Accipitridae (hawks, kites, andeagles).

Sagittariidae: SecretarybirdFinsch & Hartlaub, 1870 (1825)

1 genus, 1 speciesHBW-2

  1. Secretarybird,Sagittarius serpentarius

Pandionidae: OspreyBonaparte, 1854

1 genus, 1 speciesHBW-2

It is not clear whether the Osprey is a single species. The IOC recognizestwo Osprey species, Eastern (Indo-Australasiancristatus) and Western(everything else). Some have suggested that the Caribbean population(ridgwayi) should also be separated.

The TiF list does not currently accept either of these splits. Monti et al.(2015) sampled over 200 individuals world-wide. They found 4 clades: New world(carolinensis, includingridgwayi), Old World (haliaetus),Indo-Australian (cristatus), and North-East Asia (name uncertain). The North-East Asian clade included samples from Japan and the Pacific coast ofSiberia, as well as a few from Indonesia/New Guinea and one from East Asia.Also, acristatus haplotype was found in India. At first glance, itseemsfriedmanni may apply to the NE Asian clade, but Wolfe's descriptionoffriedmanni (Auk, Oct., 1946) states that Ospreys from Japan are notfriedmani, making me wonder which clade the type offriedmanniactually belongs to.

Monti et al. suggest that the New World clade is basal, as suggested by thecyt-b analysis. However, combining ND2 with cyt-b yielded a different topology,with the Old World clade basal. In any event, the separation of all 4 cladesappears to have taken place over a short time interval. The cyt-b analysissuggested the New World clade is a million or so years old. A few of the samples showed a mismatch between geography and clade.

At present, it remains unclear whether or not the Osprey should be considered aconsidered a single species, or 3-4.

  1. Osprey,Pandion haliaetus

Accipitridae: Hawks, Kites, EaglesVigors, 1824

73 genera, 255 speciesHBW-2

At the genus level, the order presented here attempts to synthesizethe papers by Amaral et al. (2006, 2009), Barrowclough et al. (2014),Breman et al. (2013), Griffiths et al. (2007), Haring et al. (2007b),Helbig et al. (2005), Kocum (2006), Lerner and Mindell (2005), Lerner etal. (2008), Nagy and Tökölyi (2014), Oatley et al. (2015),Ong et al. (2011), and Wink and Sauer-Gürth (2004). Some of the generawere restructured based on these and other papers.

The Accipitridae are a complicated family. You can see from the diagram that Itreat them as consisting of ten subfamilies with large families Accipitrinae andButeoninae at the end. The latter two subfamilies are further divided intotribes. The timing estimates of Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) haveinfluenced what gets counted as a subfamily and what counts as a tribe. Afterreading Jarvis et al. (2014), I suspect Nagy and Tökölyi's divergencedates are a little short. Nagy and Tökölyi did not include thecrested goshawk subfamily, Lophospizinae, but indications are that it is nearAquilinae (Oatley et al., 2015).

The subfamily Accipitrinae is slightly smaller than Buteoninae, so I put itahead of Buteoninae. The crested goshawks seem to be basal to both of them. There's now some evidence they belong in the Harpiinae plus Aquilinae group,which is sister to the Accipitrinae + Buteoninae group. The grouping of thesefive families is supported by morphology as well as genetics. Mayr (2014b) foundthat four of them (with the fifth not tested) share a derived type of radialcarpal bone. The closest relatives of this big clade are Circaetinae andGypinae. All together are sister to Gypaetinae and Perninae, and the wholeshebang is sister to the basal group, Elaninae. This is all summed up in thediagram.

Accipitriformes tree
Click for genus-level tree of Accipitriformes

Elaninae: Elanine KitesBlyth, 1851

One thing that genetic results have made clear is that the kites are nota natural group. Rather, they are scattered in three subfamilie.The first group is the Elanine kites. Kites also occur in three clades inPerninae and four clades in Buteoninae.

  1. Pearl Kite,Gampsonyx swainsonii
    Click for Accipitridae tree
    Click for Accipitridae
    species tree
  2. Scissor-tailed Kite,Chelictinia riocourii
  3. Black-winged Kite,Elanus caeruleus
  4. Black-shouldered Kite,Elanus axillaris
  5. Letter-winged Kite,Elanus scriptus
  6. White-tailed Kite,Elanus leucurus

Gypaetinae: African Vultures, Harrier-HawksBonaparte, 1831

Now that it is clear thatHenicopernis belongs within Perninae(Barrowclough et al., 2014), this small primarily African clade iscleanly separated from Perninae. The separation from Perninae seems tobe quite ancient (Nagy and Tökölyi, 2014), so I recognize bothgroups as subfamilies.

  1. African Harrier-Hawk,Polyboroides typus
  2. Madagascan Harrier-Hawk,Polyboroides radiatus
  3. Palm-nut Vulture,Gypohierax angolensis
  4. Egyptian Vulture,Neophron percnopterus
  5. Bearded Vulture / Lammergeier,Gypaetus barbatus

Perninae: Bazas, Honey-BuzzardsBlyth, 1851

The Honey-Buzzards (Pernis) have been sorted out by Gamauf andHaring (2004), including the recently-split Philippine Honey-Buzzard. Barrowclough et al. (2014) provided additional information concerningthe Australo-Papuan species.

Three groups of kites are part of Perninae. The NeotropicalChondrohierax andLeptodon kites, the Swallow-tailedKite (Elanoides, sister to thePernis honey-buzzards),and the Square-tailed Kite (Lophoictinia, sister to theHenicopernis honey-buzzards). Note that the honey-buzzardsare not a natural group either.

  1. Madagascan Serpent-Eagle,Eutriorchis astur
  2. Hook-billed Kite,Chondrohierax uncinatus
  3. Gray-headed Kite,Leptodon cayanensis
  4. White-collared Kite,Leptodon forbesi
  5. Swallow-tailed Kite,Elanoides forficatus
  6. European Honey-Buzzard,Pernis apivorus
  7. Philippine Honey-Buzzard,Pernis steerei
  8. Oriental Honey-Buzzard / Crested Honey-Buzzard,Pernis ptilorhynchus
  9. Barred Honey-Buzzard,Pernis celebensis
  10. Black-breasted Buzzard,Hamirostra melanosternon
  11. Square-tailed Kite,Lophoictinia isura
  12. Long-tailed Honey-Buzzard,Henicopernis longicauda
  13. Black Honey-Buzzard,Henicopernis infuscatus
  14. Black Baza,Aviceda leuphotes
  15. African Cuckoo-Hawk,Aviceda cuculoides
  16. Madagascan Cuckoo-Hawk,Aviceda madagascariensis
  17. Jerdon's Baza,Aviceda jerdoni
  18. Pacific Baza,Aviceda subcristata

Gypinae: Old World VulturesBlyth, 1851

The name Gypinae (Blyth, 1851) has priority over Aegypiinae (W.P.Sclater, 1924). The Old World Vultures are gathered here and fall intotwo clades. The first four species (and genera!) are in one clade, withNecrosyrtes andGyps in the other. The arrangement ofspecies withinGyps has taken both Arshad et al. (2009) and Nagyand Tökölyi (2014) into account. I follow Lerner et al. (2005)and Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) for the genera. Arshad et al. isalmost the same, while Griffiths et al. (2009) is broadly consistent butless well-resolved.

  1. Red-headed Vulture,Sarcogyps calvus
  2. White-headed Vulture,Trigonoceps occipitalis
  3. Cinereous Vulture,Aegypius monachus
  4. Lappet-faced Vulture,Torgos tracheliotos
  5. Hooded Vulture,Necrosyrtes monachus
  6. White-backed Vulture,Gyps africanus
  7. White-rumped Vulture,Gyps bengalensis
  8. Himalayan Vulture,Gyps himalayensis
  9. Griffon Vulture,Gyps fulvus
  10. Rueppell's Vulture,Gyps rueppelli
  11. Cape Vulture,Gyps coprotheres
  12. Slender-billed Vulture,Gyps tenuirostris
  13. Indian Vulture,Gyps indicus

Circaetinae: Serpent EaglesBlyth, 1851

In the Serpent Eagles,Dryotriorchis has been merged intoCircaetus. Exactly how manyspecies are inSpilornis remains an issue. There are six here, butFerguson-Lees and Christie (2001) list 13! I've not accepted the IOCsplit ofminimus because I don't see any evidence to split thisand not the others.

  1. Andaman Serpent-Eagle,Spilornis elgini
  2. Philippine Serpent-Eagle,Spilornis holospilus
  3. Crested Serpent-Eagle,Spilornis cheela
  4. Great Nicobar Serpent-Eagle,Spilornis klossi
  5. Mountain Serpent-Eagle,Spilornis kinabaluensis
  6. Sulawesi Serpent-Eagle,Spilornis rufipectus
  7. Philippine Eagle,Pithecophaga jefferyi
  8. Bateleur,Terathopius ecaudatus
  9. Western Banded Snake-Eagle,Circaetus cinerascens
  10. Southern Banded Snake-Eagle,Circaetus fasciolatus
  11. Congo Serpent-Eagle,Circaetus spectabilis
  12. Beaudouin's Snake-Eagle,Circaetus beaudouini
  13. Black-chested Snake-Eagle,Circaetus pectoralis
  14. Brown Snake-Eagle,Circaetus cinereus
  15. Short-toed Snake-Eagle,Circaetus gallicus

Lophospizinae: Crested GoshawksInformal

What evidence there is suggests that the Crested Goshawk is notpart of Accipitrinae. Barcoding suggested it is basal to the Accipitrinae/Buteoninaeclade (Ong et al., 2011; Breman et al., 2013). Raty, in aBirdForum postgot similar results when adding a partial cytochrome-b gene.More recently, Oatley et al.'s (2015) 4-gene analysis found the Crested Goshawk near theAquilinae (Harpiinae was not in the analysis). I'm not sure I'm entirely convinced,but I've double-down on this and put it in a trichotomywith Harpiinae and Aquilinae. Besides, there's something that appeals to me inhaving the crested goshawks near the harpy eagles.

DNA from the Sulawesi (Crested) Goshawk has notbeen tested, but it is thought to be a very close relative of theCrested Goshawk, with the two forming a superspecies. The nameLophospiza (Kaup 1844, typetrivirgata) is available forthese two species.

  1. Crested Goshawk,Lophospiza trivirgata
  2. Sulawesi Goshawk,Lophospiza griseiceps

Harpiinae: Harpy EaglesLesson, 1828

The split between the harpy eagles and booted eagles seems to have occurredabout 20 million years ago (Nagy and Tökölyi, 2014), so I treat them as separate subfamilies.

  1. Bat Hawk,Macheiramphus alcinus
  2. Papuan Eagle,Harpyopsis novaeguineae
  3. Harpy Eagle,Harpia harpyja
  4. Crested Eagle,Morphnus guianensis

Aquilinae: Booted EaglesVigors, 1825

The key papers for the Booted Eagles (Aquilinae) are Bunce et al. (2005), Helbig et al. (2005), Lerner and Mindell (2005), Haring et al.(2007b), and Lerner et al. (2017).Aquilinae treeTheSpizaetus Hawk-Eagles belong in two different clades withinAquilinae. ThusSpizaetus is divided intoNisaetus andSpizaetus. The Black-and-chestnut Eagle (Oroaetus) mustbe merged into the remainingSpizaetus. The Rufous-bellied Hawk-Eagle(Lophotriorchis) is separated fromHieraaetus. whilethe spotted eagles are separated fromAquila asClanga.Hieraaetus loses a couple of species toAquila, which alsogains Cassin's Hawk-Eagle fromSpizaetus.

Although it is fairly basal, there is still some uncertain concerningthe closest relatives of the Crowned Eagle,Stephanoaetus coronatus.

I've included the extinct Haast's Eagle of New Zealand on the speciestree since Bunce et al. (2005) analyzed DNA from it. However, it isn'tincluded on the main list because it likely became extinct prior to1500, which is the cutoff for inclusion.

  1. Crowned Eagle,Stephanoaetus coronatus
  2. Legge's Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus kelaarti
  3. Sulawesi Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus lanceolatus
  4. Pinsker's Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus pinskeri
  5. Changeable Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus cirrhatus
  6. Philippine Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus philippensis
  7. Wallace's Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus nanus
  8. Mountain Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus nipalensis
  9. Blyth's Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus alboniger
  10. Javan Hawk-Eagle,Nisaetus bartelsi
  11. Black Hawk-Eagle,Spizaetus tyrannus
  12. Black-and-white Hawk-Eagle,Spizaetus melanoleucus
  13. Ornate Hawk-Eagle,Spizaetus ornatus
  14. Black-and-chestnut Eagle,Spizaetus isidori
  15. Rufous-bellied Hawk-Eagle,Lophotriorchis kienerii
  16. Martial Eagle,Polemaetus bellicosus
  17. Long-crested Eagle,Lophaetus occipitalis
  18. Black Eagle,Ictinaetus malaiensis
  19. Indian Spotted-Eagle,Clanga hastata
  20. Lesser Spotted-Eagle,Clanga pomarina
  21. Greater Spotted-Eagle,Clanga clanga
  22. Wahlberg's Eagle,Hieraaetus wahlbergi
  23. Ayres's Hawk-Eagle,Hieraaetus ayresii
  24. Pygmy Eagle,Hieraaetus weiskei
  25. Booted Eagle,Hieraaetus pennatus
  26. Little Eagle,Hieraaetus morphnoides
  27. Steppe Eagle,Aquila nipalensis
  28. Tawny Eagle,Aquila rapax
  29. Spanish Imperial-Eagle,Aquila adalberti
  30. Eastern Imperial-Eagle,Aquila heliaca
  31. Golden Eagle,Aquila chrysaetos
  32. Cassin's Hawk-Eagle,Aquila africana
  33. Gurney's Eagle,Aquila gurneyi
  34. Wedge-tailed Eagle,Aquila audax
  35. Verreaux's Eagle,Aquila verreauxii
  36. Bonelli's Eagle,Aquila fasciata
  37. African Hawk-Eagle,Aquila spilogaster

Accipitrinae: Accipiters, HarriersVigors, 1824

There is a deep division of the Accipitrinae into two groups which I rank as tribes: Melieraxini and Accipitrini.

Melieraxini: Chanting Goshawks and alliesInformal

The Tiny Hawk (and presumably Semicollared Hawk) do not seem closelyrelated toAccipiter (Kocum, 2006; Olson, 2006) and have beenremoved fromAccipiter.

New Name forHieraspiza:Sangster et al. (2021a) showed that the genus nameHieraspizadoes not apply to the Tiny Hawk. According, it and the Semicollared Hawkare transferred toMicrospizias, becomingTiny Hawk,Microspizias superciliosus andSemicollared Hawk,Microspizias collaris.

Kocum (2006) includes several species from this group in herdissertation. Her analysis places them in a weakly supported unresolvedbasal polytomy with Accipitrini, Harpagini, and the remainingButeoninae. Griffiths et al. (2007) grouped together the Lizard Buzzard, Gabar Goshawk, Long-tailed Hawk, and the chanting goshawks.The group was basal to Accipitrini and Buteoninae, but did notinclude the Tiny Hawk. The analysis by Nagy and Tökölyi(2014) bundles them together as shown here, but their evidence for thisseems weak.

The name Melieraxinae has appeared in the literature since at least Lernerand Mindell (2005), but does not seem to be formally established.

  1. Lizard Buzzard,Kaupifalco monogrammicus
  2. Gabar Goshawk,Micronisus gabar
  3. Long-tailed Hawk,Urotriorchis macrourus
  4. Tiny Hawk,Microspizias superciliosus
  5. Semicollared Hawk,Microspizias collaris
  6. Dark Chanting-Goshawk,Melierax metabates
  7. Eastern Chanting-Goshawk,Melierax poliopterus
  8. Pale Chanting-Goshawk,Melierax canorus

Notes on Accipitrini: Accipiters & Harriers

The papers by Wink and Sauer-Gürth (2004), Breman et al. (2013),Barrowclough et al. (2014), Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) andKocum's dissertation (2006) allow us to make a rough draft of aspecies-level tree for the accipitters. Doubtless it will need furtheradjustment.

The result is that the genusAccipiter has been divided into6 pieces. Two of those,Hieraspiza andLophospizahave been moved outside the Accipitrini. Kocum (2006), Griffiths et al.(2007), Lerner et al. (2008), and Nagy and Tökölyi (2014)found that theCircus harriers are embedded within thetraditionalAccipiter. The options are to lumpCircus intoAccipiter or divideAccipiter into at least three parts. I've chosen to take the latter course, dividingAccipter intofour parts.

The Cooper's Hawk, Northern Goshawk, and closely related taxa are theclosest relatives of the harriers. They go in genusAstur(Lacépède 1799, typegentilis). These are sister toa clade that includes the Eurasian Sparrowhawk and the Sharp-shinnedHawk complex. It retains the nameAccipiter (Brisson 1760, typenisus). I have included the Gray-bellied Hawk with this groupbased on Kocum (2006), although the support for this is not strong.

The remaining accipiters andErythrotriorchis form a cladesister to the combinedAccipiter-Astur-Circusclade. There is a deep division (ca. 15 million years) between a small groupof African accipiters and the remaining accipiters, so they are dividedinto two genera:Aerospiza (Roberts 1922, typetachiro)andTachyspiza.

The two oldest available names for theTachyspiza clade seem tobeTachyspiza (typesoloensis) andLeucospiza (typenovaehollandiae). Both are from the same 1844 monograph by Kaup,published in early 1844, no later than March. Another available name forthe clade is Blyth's (1844)Nisastur, typebadius, but thatseems to date from July (fide Richmond index).

NeitherTachyspiza norLeucospiza seems to have obtainedany priority over the other, and I'm somewhat arbitrarily usingTachyspiza here. However, someone will need to formally pick one inthe literature and give it priority, hopefullyTachyspiza. The nameLeucospiza really only fits the white morph ofnovaehollandiae. At present, it is unclear where exactlyErythrotriorchis fits in. It may be sister toAerospiza, ortoTachyspiza or even embedded within one of them (Barrowclough etal, 2014 is not conclusive).

WithinTachyspiza, the position of the Spot-tailed Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza trinotata, is quite uncertain. I also have doubts aboutwhere thehenicogramma-novaehollandiae clade goes. Nagy andTökölyi (2014), apparently using the RAG-1 gene from subspeciesrufoschistaceus (hiogaster, notnovaehollandiae) putit nearimitator, but Breman et al. (2013), using the barcodingregion, put another member of the clade,fasciata, nearervirgata. There is also some uncertainty about exactly wheresoloensis goes. I've followed Kocum's (2006) multigene analysis, butNagy and Tökölyi (2014) have it in a rather differentposition.

This list includes three relatives of the Sharp-shinned Hawk thatSACC has not split (although they are split in the Sibley-Monore list).They could be allopatric forms best treated as one species. However,although the combined analysis of Kocum (2006) placedventralisanderythronemius in a cladestriatus, other arrangementswere seen for some of the other genes (chionogaster was notincluded). Breman et al. (2013) also found a separation betweenstriatus anderythronemius. This hints, but does notprove, that a species-level treatment is appropriate, as has beenfollowed by various authors.

Sharp-shinned Hawk complex:Catanach et al. (2021) found that the Sharpies of theGreater Antilles are related to the a clade consisting of North and SouthAmerican Sharp-shinned Hawks. The distances suggest species-level taxa, soI've added the three island species to the complex, bringing it to sevenspecies.

The oldest named subspecies of the Sharp-shinned Hawk wasstriatus.As that is now the Hispaniolan Hawk, we have to turn to the next oldest namefor the Sharp-shinned Hawk,Accipiter velox. This paper has also led me to rearrange the South American species.

They also note an intriguing connection between the Rufous-thighed Hawk,Accipiter erythronemius and the Eurasian Sparrowhawk,Accipiter nisus.

The arrangement of the harriers follows Oatley et al. (2015). I have splitthe Hen and Northern Harriers. Oatley et al. found that the Northern Harrierwas closer to the Cinereous Harrier than to the Hen Harrier. Oatley et al. also found that the last 5 harriers are very closely related, possibily conspecific.However, I distrust their estimated divergence dates. They are markedly shorterthan comparable dates in Nagy and Tökölyi (2014), which already seema bit short compared to Jarvis et al. (2015).

Accipitrini: Accipiters, Harriers

  1. Chestnut-shouldered Goshawk,Erythrotriorchis buergersi
  2. Red Goshawk,Erythrotriorchis radiatus
  3. Chestnut-flanked Sparrowhawk,Aerospiza castanilius
  4. Red-chested Goshawk,Aerospiza toussenelii
  5. African Goshawk,Aerospiza tachiro
  6. Red-thighed Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza erythropus
  7. Little Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza minulla
  8. Spot-tailed Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza trinotata
  9. Japanese Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza gularis
  10. Besra,Tachyspiza virgata
  11. Dwarf Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza nana
  12. Vinous-breasted Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza rhodogaster
  13. Rufous-necked Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza erythrauchen
  14. Collared Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza cirrocephala
  15. New Britain Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza brachyura
  16. Moluccan Goshawk,Tachyspiza henicogramma
  17. Brown Goshawk,Tachyspiza fasciata
  18. Variable Goshawk,Tachyspiza hiogaster
  19. Gray Goshawk,Tachyspiza novaehollandiae
  20. Shikra,Tachyspiza badia
  21. Levant Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza brevipes
  22. Nicobar Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza butleri
  23. Chinese Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza soloensis
  24. Black-mantled Goshawk,Tachyspiza melanochlamys
  25. Pied Goshawk,Tachyspiza albogularis
  26. White-bellied Goshawk,Tachyspiza haplochroa
  27. Fiji Goshawk,Tachyspiza rufitorques
  28. Frances's Sparrowhawk,Tachyspiza francesiae
  29. Slaty-mantled Goshawk,Tachyspiza luteoschistacea
  30. Imitator Goshawk,Tachyspiza imitator
  31. Gray-headed Goshawk,Tachyspiza poliocephala
  32. New Britain Goshawk,Tachyspiza princeps
  33. Gray-bellied Hawk,Accipiter poliogaster
  34. Ovambo Sparrowhawk,Accipiter ovampensis
  35. Madagascan Sparrowhawk,Accipiter madagascariensis
  36. Eurasian Sparrowhawk,Accipiter nisus
  37. Rufous-breasted Sparrowhawk,Accipiter rufiventris
  38. Rufous-thighed Hawk,Accipiter erythronemius
  39. Plain-breasted Hawk,Accipiter ventralis
  40. Sharp-shinned Hawk,Accipiter velox
  41. White-breasted Hawk,Accipiter chionogaster
  42. Cuban Hawk,Accipiter fringilloides
  43. Hispaniolan Hawk,Accipiter striatus
  44. Puerto Rican Hawk,Accipiter venator
  45. Doria's Goshawk,Megatriorchis doriae
  46. Bicolored Hawk,Astur bicolor
  47. Cooper's Hawk,Astur cooperii
  48. Gundlach's Hawk,Astur gundlachi
  49. Northern Goshawk,Astur gentilis
  50. Meyer's Goshawk,Astur meyerianus
  51. Black Sparrowhawk,Astur melanoleucus
  52. Henst's Goshawk,Astur henstii
  53. Spotted Harrier,Circus assimilis
  54. Pallid Harrier,Circus macrourus
  55. Black Harrier,Circus maurus
  56. Hen Harrier,Circus cyaneus
  57. Northern Harrier,Circus hudsonius
  58. Cinereous Harrier,Circus cinereus
  59. Long-winged Harrier,Circus buffoni
  60. Montagu's Harrier,Circus pygargus
  61. Pied Harrier,Circus melanoleucos
  62. Western Marsh-Harrier,Circus aeruginosus
  63. African Marsh-Harrier,Circus ranivorus
  64. Swamp Harrier,Circus approximans
  65. Papuan Harrier,Circus spilothorax
  66. Reunion Harrier,Circus maillardi
  67. Eastern Marsh-Harrier,Circus spilonotus
  68. Malagasy Harrier,Circus macrosceles

Buteoninae: ButeosVigors 1824

The Buteoninae are the largest subfamily of the Accipitridae.According to Nagy and Tökölyi (2014), the clade is roughly 20million years old. There are three deep divisions (15-18 million yearsago) in the Buteoninae which I have recognized as tribes: Harpagini,Milvini, and Buteonini.

Many of the changes between versions 2.00 and 2.01 of this pagewere due to the publication of Lerner et al. (2008). Their results havesubsequently been refined by Amaral et al. (2009) and Nagy andTökölyi (2014). I have additionally consulted Amaral et al. (2006),Barrowclough et al.\ (2014), Griffiths et al.\ (2007), Kocum (2006),Kruckenhauser et al.\ (2004), Ong et al.\ (2011), and Riesing et al.(2003). Although these sources are not in 100% agreement, and there arestill a few lacuna, I think the Buteoninae are now in pretty good shapeeven at the species level.

There might still be a little modification of species boundaries togo, particularly inPseudastur and nearButeo buteo. I'vemodified the generic limits quite a bit in the Buteoninae, but lessdrastically than suggested by Riesing et al. (2003) and by Lerner et al.(2008). Most of these changes were also adopted by Amaral et al.(2009), which prompted some further changes in version 2.15. This hasbeen further refined by considering Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) inversion 2.61.

HarpaginiBonaparte, 1854

Harpagini consists of the twoHarpagus kites. Nagy andTökölyi (2014) put Harpagini in the basal position. Griffithset al. (2007) also included them in their analysis. They haveHarpagus basal to Accipitrinae + Buteoninae. However, resolutionwas poor, and other basal raptors from Griffiths et al. have moved toAccipitridae.

  1. Double-toothed Kite,Harpagus bidentatus
  2. Rufous-thighed Kite,Harpagus diodon

Milvini: Sea Eagles and Milvine KitesVigors 1824

Buteoninae treeMilvini consists of the milvine kites and sea and fish eagles. Thekites are the second of the four kite clades in Buteoninae.

The two-species version ofIcthyophagaturns out to be nested withinHaliaeetus. It could either besubmerged intoHaliaeetus, or expanded to include fourHaliaeetus species. I've taken the second option. This putsall of the northern fish-eagles and sea-eagles inHaliaeetus, whilethe tropical fish/sea-eagles are inIcthyophaga. The two groups are notonly geographically separated, but are visually distinct—compare therelatively longer, narrower wings ofHaliaeetus to the shorter,broader wings ofIcthyophaga. There's a spelling issue here:Icthyophaga orIchthyophaga? Both Dickinson (2003) andPeterson (zoonomen.net) give the former, which is the original spelling. Peterson also argues thatIcthyophaga is correct. Nonetheless,Ichthyophaga is also in wide usage (e.g., HBW-2).

  1. Brahminy Kite,Haliastur indus
  2. Whistling Kite,Haliastur sphenurus
  3. Red Kite,Milvus milvus
  4. Black Kite,Milvus migrans
  5. Yellow-billed Kite,Milvus aegyptius
  6. Pallas's Fish-Eagle,Haliaeetus leucoryphus
  7. Steller's Sea-Eagle,Haliaeetus pelagicus
  8. White-tailed Eagle,Haliaeetus albicilla
  9. Bald Eagle,Haliaeetus leucocephalus
  10. White-bellied Sea-Eagle,Icthyophaga leucogaster
  11. Sanford's Sea-Eagle,Icthyophaga sanfordi
  12. African Fish-Eagle,Icthyophaga vocifer
  13. Madagascan Fish-Eagle,Icthyophaga vociferoides
  14. Lesser Fish-Eagle,Icthyophaga humilis
  15. Gray-headed Fish-Eagle,Icthyophaga ichthyaetus

Buteonini: ButeosVigors 1824

This brings us to Buteonini. The first branch consists ofButastur buzzards and the second branch is theIctinia kites(third of the four Buteoninae kite clades).The next clade containsBusarellus,Geranospiza, and the final kite clade,Rostrhamus and presumablyHelicolestes. Except possibly for the last two, they are all long-separated anddeserving of genus status.

There have been big changes forButeogallus. The traditionalButeogallus hawks turned out to be closely related toHarpyhaliaetus and three of theLeucopternis hawks.Prior to version 2.15, I was rolling them all intoButeogallus. Then,I followed the recommendations of Amaral et al. (2009), who create two newgenera and also slightly adjust the taxonomy. After several rounds of debate,the SACC has settled on another solution, which I follow as of version 2.55.They recognize the new genusCryptoleucopteryx (Amaral et al, 2009)for the Plumbeous Hawk (formerly inLeucopternis).Buteogallus now applies to the oldButeogallus plusSlate-colored Hawk and White-necked Hawk (fromLeucopternis) andthe twoHarpyhaliaetus solitary-eagles. Amaral et al. (2009) and Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) estimate the commonButeogallus ancestorat about 4-6 million years ago, so putting them all in one genus is reasonable.In contrast, they estimate that the originalButeogallus separated fromCryptoleucopteryx somewhere between 7 and 10 million yearsago.

This brings us to point C, one place where Lerner et al. suggest therest be consideredButeo. I think this idea hides more taxonomythan it reveals and prefer a somewhat different arrangement. As ithappens, Amaral et al. (2009) came to similar conclusions. Amaral etal. and Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) estimate thatMorphnarchus separated fromButeo about 8-11 million yearsago.Morphnarchus is anotherLeucopternis refugee, whilethe Roadside Hawk (Rupornis) is sometimes considered part ofButeo. The same is true of the White-rumped Hawk, which hasjoined Harris's Hawk inParabueto. Nagy and Tökölyi (2014)and Barrowclough et al. (2014) putRupornis in a clade withParabueto, but I believe that Amaral et al. (2009) are used moredata here and found them on sequential branches.

The clade starting at B is also flagged by Lerner et al. as a goodstarting point forButeo. The formerLeucopternis, White,Gray-backed, and Mantled Hawks are placed inPseudastur while thesome of the remainingLeucopternis are put inGeranoaetus. This includes the White-tailed, and Variable (sometimes split as Red-backed andPuna) Hawks, formerly inButeo. It should be noted that the speciesboundaries inPseudastur seriously need adjustment, but it seems thatfurther study will be needed to clarify the situation.

The clade at C is also a plausible way to delimitButeo. The SACC prefers to retainLeucopternis. The balance of evidence suggestsLeucopternis is more basal than the Gray and Gray-lined Hawks(subgenusAsturina). Amaral et al. (2009) findAsturinasister toButeo and Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) put theAsturina hawks a little deeper in the buteos. I now follow bothAOU committees by includingAsturina inButeo.

Based on Millsap et al. (2011), the Gray Hawk, formerlyAsturinanitida, has been split into Gray Hawk,Asturina plagiata andGray-lined Hawk,Asturina nitida.

As defined below,Buteo consists primarily of species breedingin the Old World and Nearctic, with a few Neotropical species. Theother genera that might be included inButeoLeucopternis (point A),Pseudastur,Geranoaetus(point B),Parabuteo,Rupornis, andMorphnarchus(point C) — are primarily South and Middle American breeders.

Amaral et al. (2009) and Nagy and Tökölyi (2014) help clearup the situation with the remainingButeo species, although someissues remain. The New World species split out nicely, up to thelagopus/regalis pair. Then we get into the Old Worldbuteos, whose taxonomy remains somewhat murky. Two species were notconsidered in their analysis, and the true species boundaries among theOld World buteos remain somewhat uncertain. I expect that the treatmenthere will subject to a bit of revision as more is known.

Riesing et al. (2003, Fig.5) found evidence that Archer's Buzzard,Buteo archeri is not part of the Augur Buzzard,Buteoaugur, but is sister to a clade consisting of the Red-necked, Augurand Jackal Buzzards, and possibly the Madagascan Buzzard,Buteobrachypterus. Other evidence in Riesing et al. (Fig.4), and in Nagyand Tökölyi (2014) putsbrachypterus in a slightly morebasal position, out of this clade.

Another apparently misplaced buteo was the Forest Buzzard,Buteotrizonatus. It was considered a subspecies of the Mountain Buzzard,Buteo oreophilus, but genetic data (esp. Kruckenhauser et al., 2004)suggests it is closer to the Common Buzzard,Buteo buteo.Although the genetic distance is small, its distant separation from theCommon Buzzard's breeding range and distinct plumage suggest it shouldbe considered a distinct species.

Although the breeding buzzards of the Cape Verde and Socotra Islandshave been considered races of the Common Buzzard, genetic data (Clouetand Wink, 2000) suggests they are more closely related to theLong-legged Buzzard,Buteo rufinus. Once again, the geneticdistances are small, but this suggests treating them as distinctspecies: Cape Verde Buzzard,Buteo bannermani, and SocotraBuzzard,Buteo socotraensis. Oddly, although it had been studiedfor over a century, the Socotra Buzzard had not been formally nameduntil 2010 when Porter and Kirwan dubbed itButeo socotraensis.This replaces the informal name ‘B. socotrae’ that some haveused.

  1. Grasshopper Buzzard,Butastur rufipennis
  2. White-eyed Buzzard,Butastur teesa
  3. Rufous-winged Buzzard,Butastur liventer
  4. Gray-faced Buzzard,Butastur indicus
  5. Mississippi Kite,Ictinia mississippiensis
  6. Plumbeous Kite,Ictinia plumbea
  7. Black-collared Hawk,Busarellus nigricollis
  8. Crane Hawk,Geranospiza caerulescens
  9. Snail Kite,Rostrhamus sociabilis
  10. Slender-billed Kite,Helicolestes hamatus
  11. Plumbeous Hawk,Cryptoleucopteryx plumbea
  12. Slate-colored Hawk,Buteogallus schistaceus
  13. Rufous Crab Hawk,Buteogallus aequinoctialis
  14. Common Black Hawk,Buteogallus anthracinus
  15. Cuban Black Hawk,Buteogallus gundlachii
  16. Savanna Hawk,Buteogallus meridionalis
  17. White-necked Hawk,Buteogallus lacernulatus
  18. Great Black Hawk,Buteogallus urubitinga
  19. Solitary Eagle,Buteogallus solitarius
  20. Chaco Eagle,Buteogallus coronatus
  21. Barred Hawk,Morphnarchus princeps
  22. Roadside Hawk,Rupornis magnirostris
  23. Harris's Hawk,Parabuteo unicinctus
  24. White-rumped Hawk,Parabuteo leucorrhous
  25. White-tailed Hawk,Geranoaetus albicaudatus
  26. Variable Hawk,Geranoaetus polyosoma
  27. Black-chested Buzzard-Eagle,Geranoaetus melanoleucus
  28. Gray-backed Hawk,Pseudastur occidentalis
  29. White Hawk,Pseudastur albicollis
  30. Mantled Hawk,Pseudastur polionotus
  31. Semiplumbeous Hawk,Leucopternis semiplumbeus
  32. Black-faced Hawk,Leucopternis melanops
  33. White-browed Hawk,Leucopternis kuhli
  34. Gray Hawk,Buteo plagiatus
  35. Gray-lined Hawk,Buteo nitidus
  36. Red-shouldered Hawk,Buteo lineatus
  37. Ridgway's Hawk,Buteo ridgwayi
  38. Broad-winged Hawk,Buteo platypterus
  39. Hawaiian Hawk,Buteo solitarius
  40. White-throated Hawk,Buteo albigula
  41. Short-tailed Hawk,Buteo brachyurus
  42. Galapagos Hawk,Buteo galapagoensis
  43. Swainson's Hawk,Buteo swainsoni
  44. Zone-tailed Hawk,Buteo albonotatus
  45. Red-tailed Hawk,Buteo jamaicensis
  46. Rufous-tailed Hawk,Buteo ventralis
  47. Rough-legged Hawk / Rough-legged Buzzard,Buteo lagopus
  48. Ferruginous Hawk,Buteo regalis
  49. Madagascan Buzzard,Buteo brachypterus
  50. Archer's Buzzard,Buteo archeri
  51. Red-necked Buzzard,Buteo auguralis
  52. Augur Buzzard,Buteo augur
  53. Jackal Buzzard,Buteo rufofuscus
  54. Eastern Buzzard,Buteo japonicus
  55. Upland Buzzard,Buteo hemilasius
  56. Himalayan Buzzard,Buteo burmanicus
  57. Mountain Buzzard,Buteo oreophilus
  58. Common Buzzard,Buteo buteo
  59. Forest Buzzard,Buteo trizonatus
  60. Long-legged Buzzard,Buteo rufinus
  61. Cape Verde Buzzard,Buteo bannermani
  62. Socotra Buzzard,Buteo socotraensis

Previous PageNext Page

Taxonomy in Flux:Version 3.49, June 19, 2024 (August 7, 2021).Copyright © 2008–2024 by John H. Boyd III

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp