- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork54
Web Serving and Remote Procedure Calls at 50x lower latency and 70x higher bandwidth than FastAPI, implementing JSON-RPC & REST over io_uring ☎️
License
unum-cloud/UCall
Folders and files
| Name | Name | Last commit message | Last commit date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Repository files navigation
Most modern networking is built either on slow and ambiguous REST APIs or unnecessarily complex gRPC.FastAPI, for example, looks very approachable.We aim to be equally or even simpler to use.
| FastAPI | UCall |
|---|---|
pip install fastapi uvicorn | pip install ucall |
fromfastapiimportFastAPIimportuvicornserver=FastAPI()@server.get('/sum')defsum(a:int,b:int):returna+buvicorn.run(...) | fromucall.posiximportServer# from ucall.uring import Server on 5.19+server=Server()@serverdefsum(a:int,b:int):returna+bserver.run() |
It takes over a millisecond to handle a trivial FastAPI call on a recent 8-core CPU.In that time, light could have traveled 300 km through optics to the neighboring city or country, in my case.How does UCall compare to FastAPI and gRPC?
| Setup | 🔁 | Server | Latency w 1 client | Throughput w 32 clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fast API over REST | ❌ | 🐍 | 1'203 μs | 3'184 rps |
| Fast API over WebSocket | ✅ | 🐍 | 86 μs | 11'356 rps ¹ |
| gRPC ² | ✅ | 🐍 | 164 μs | 9'849 rps |
| UCall with POSIX | ❌ | C | 62 μs | 79'000 rps |
| UCall with io_uring | ✅ | 🐍 | 40 μs | 210'000 rps |
| UCall with io_uring | ✅ | C | 22 μs | 231'000 rps |
Table legend
All benchmarks were conducted on AWS on general purpose instances withUbuntu 22.10 AMI.It is the first major AMI to come withLinux Kernel 5.19, featuring much widerio_uring support for networking operations.These specific numbers were obtained onc7g.metal beefy instances with Graviton 3 chips.
- The 🔁 column marks, if the TCP/IP connection is being reused during subsequent requests.
- The "server" column defines the programming language, in which the server was implemented.
- The "latency" column report the amount of time between sending a request and receiving a response. μ stands for micro, μs subsequently means microseconds.
- The "throughput" column reports the number of Requests Per Second when querying the same server application from multiple client processes running on the same machine.
¹ FastAPI couldn't process concurrent requests with WebSockets.
² We tried generating C++ backends with gRPC, but its numbers, suspiciously, weren't better. There is also an async gRPC option, that wasn't tried.
How can a tiny pet-project with just a couple thousand lines of code compete with two of the most established networking libraries?UCall stands on the shoulders of Giants:
io_uringfor interrupt-less IO.io_uring_prep_read_fixedon 5.1+.io_uring_prep_accept_directon 5.19+.io_uring_register_files_sparseon 5.19+.IORING_SETUP_COOP_TASKRUNoptional on 5.19+.IORING_SETUP_SINGLE_ISSUERoptional on 6.0+.
SIMD-accelerated parsers with manual memory control.
simdjsonto parse JSON faster than gRPC can unpackProtoBuf.Turbo-Base64to decode binary values from aBase64form.picohttpparserto navigate HTTP headers.
You have already seen the latency of the round trip..., the throughput in requests per second..., want to see the bandwidth?Try yourself!
@serverdefecho(data:bytes):returndata
FastAPI supports native type, while UCall supportsnumpy.ndarray,PIL.Image and other custom types.This comes handy when you build real applications or want to deploy Multi-Modal AI, like we do withUForm.
fromucall.rich_posiximportServerimportuformserver=Server()model=uform.get_model('unum-cloud/uform-vl-multilingual')@serverdefvectorize(description:str,photo:PIL.Image.Image)->numpy.ndarray:image=model.preprocess_image(photo)tokens=model.preprocess_text(description)joint_embedding=model.encode_multimodal(image=image,text=tokens)returnjoint_embedding.cpu().detach().numpy()
We also have our own optionalClient class that helps with those custom types.
fromucall.clientimportClientclient=Client()# Explicit JSON-RPC call:response=client({'method':'vectorize','params': {'description':description,'image':image, },'jsonrpc':'2.0','id':100,})# Or the same with syntactic sugar:response=client.vectorize(description=description,image=image)
CLI likecURL
Aside from the PythonClient, we provide an easy-to-use Command Line Interface, which comes withpip install ucall.It allow you to call a remote server, upload files, with direct support for images and NumPy arrays.Translating previous example into a Bash script, to call the server on the same machine:
ucall vectorize description='Product description' -i image=./local/path.pngTo address a remote server:
ucall vectorize description='Product description' -i image=./local/path.png --uri 0.0.0.0 -p 8545To print the docs, useucall -h:
usage: ucall [-h] [--uri URI] [--port PORT] [-f [FILE ...]] [-i [IMAGE ...]] [--positional [POSITIONAL ...]] method [kwargs ...]UCall Client CLIpositional arguments: method method name kwargs method argumentsoptions: -h, --help show this help message and exit --uri URI server uri --port PORT server port -f [FILE ...], --file [FILE ...] method positional arguments -i [IMAGE ...], --image [IMAGE ...] method positional arguments --positional [POSITIONAL ...] method positional arguments
You can also explicitly annotate types, to distinguish integers, floats, and strings, to avoid ambiguity.
ucall auth id=256ucall auth id:int=256ucall auth id:str=256We will leave bandwidth measurements to enthusiasts, but will share some more numbers.The general logic is that you can't squeeze high performance from Free-Tier machines.Currently AWS provides following options:t2.micro andt4g.small, on older Intel and newer Graviton 2 chips.This library is so fast, that it doesn't need more than 1 core, so you can run a fast server even on a tiny Free-Tier server!
| Setup | 🔁 | Server | Clients | t2.micro | t4g.small |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fast API over REST | ❌ | 🐍 | 1 | 328 rps | 424 rps |
| Fast API over WebSocket | ✅ | 🐍 | 1 | 1'504 rps | 3'051 rps |
| gRPC | ✅ | 🐍 | 1 | 1'169 rps | 1'974 rps |
| UCall with POSIX | ❌ | C | 1 | 1'082 rps | 2'438 rps |
| UCall with io_uring | ✅ | C | 1 | - | 5'864 rps |
| UCall with POSIX | ❌ | C | 32 | 3'399 rps | 39'877 rps |
| UCall with io_uring | ✅ | C | 32 | - | 88'455 rps |
In this case, every server was bombarded by requests from 1 or a fleet of 32 other instances in the same availability zone.If you want to reproduce those benchmarks, check out thesum examples on GitHub.
For Python:
pip install ucall
For CMake projects:
include(FetchContent)FetchContent_Declare( ucall GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/unum-cloud/ucall GIT_SHALLOWTRUE)FetchContent_MakeAvailable(ucall)include_directories(${ucall_SOURCE_DIR}/include)
The C usage example is mouthful compared to Python.We wanted to make it as lightweight as possible and to allow optional arguments without dynamic allocations and named lookups.So unlike the Python layer, we expect the user to manually extract the arguments from the call context withucall_param_named_i64(), and its siblings.
#include<cstdio.h>#include<ucall/ucall.h>staticvoidsum(ucall_call_tcall,ucall_callback_tag_t) {int64_ta{},b{};charprinted_sum[256]{};boolgot_a=ucall_param_named_i64(call,"a",0,&a);boolgot_b=ucall_param_named_i64(call,"b",0,&b);if (!got_a|| !got_b)returnucall_call_reply_error_invalid_params(call);intlen=snprintf(printed_sum,256,"%ll",a+b);ucall_call_reply_content(call,printed_sum,len);}intmain(intargc,char**argv) {ucall_server_tserver{};ucall_config_tconfig{};ucall_init(&config,&server);ucall_add_procedure(server,"sum",&sum,NULL);ucall_take_calls(server,0);ucall_free(server);return0;}
- Batch Requests
- JSON-RPC over raw TCP sockets
- JSON-RPC over TCP with HTTP
- Concurrent sessions
- NumPy
arrayand Pillow serialization - HTTPS support
- Batch-capable endpoints for ML
- Zero-ETL relay calls
- Integrating withUKV
- WebSockets for web interfaces
- AF_XDP and UDP-based analogs on Linux
Want to affect the roadmap and request a feature? Join the discussions on Discord.
- Transport independent: UDP, TCP, bring what you want.
- Application layer is optional: use HTTP or not.
- Unlike REST APIs, there is just one way to pass arguments.
About
Web Serving and Remote Procedure Calls at 50x lower latency and 70x higher bandwidth than FastAPI, implementing JSON-RPC & REST over io_uring ☎️
Topics
Resources
License
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Stars
Watchers
Forks
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Contributors13
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.