Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

 Sign up
Appearance settings

Commit9410f7d

Browse files
committed
docs(benchmark): update benchmark
1 parent93159a8 commit9410f7d

File tree

8 files changed

+48
-48
lines changed

8 files changed

+48
-48
lines changed

‎README.md‎

Lines changed: 12 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -109,34 +109,34 @@ Mutative is up to 6x faster than naive handcrafted reducer for updating immutabl
109109

110110
>Mutative passed all of Immer's test cases.
111111
112-
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.0.11 vs Immer v10.1.1]
112+
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.1.0 vs Immer v10.1.1]
113113

114114
![Benchmark](benchmark.jpg)
115115

116116
```
117-
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,469 ops/sec ±0.82% (99 runs sampled)
118-
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,015 ops/sec ±1.17% (94 runs sampled)
119-
Immer - No Freeze x 5.36 ops/sec ±0.28% (18 runs sampled)
117+
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,670 ops/sec ±0.64% (96 runs sampled)
118+
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,747 ops/sec ±0.61% (95 runs sampled)
119+
Immer - No Freeze x 5.65 ops/sec ±1.53% (19 runs sampled)
120120
121-
Mutative - Freeze x959 ops/sec ±0.90% (99 runs sampled)
122-
Immer - Freeze x382 ops/sec ±0.53% (94 runs sampled)
121+
Mutative - Freeze x1,062 ops/sec ±0.74% (95 runs sampled)
122+
Immer - Freeze x394 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
123123
124-
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x970 ops/sec ±0.99% (96 runs sampled)
125-
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.22 ops/sec ±0.80% (18 runs sampled)
124+
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x1,011 ops/sec ±0.24% (98 runs sampled)
125+
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.64 ops/sec ±0.22% (19 runs sampled)
126126
127-
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x505 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
128-
Immer - Patches and Freeze x275 ops/sec ±0.49% (89 runs sampled)
127+
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x545 ops/sec ±1.19% (94 runs sampled)
128+
Immer - Patches and Freeze x215 ops/sec ±0.70% (86 runs sampled)
129129
130130
The fastest method is Mutative - No Freeze
131131
```
132132

133133
Run`yarn benchmark` to measure performance.
134134

135-
>OS: macOS 14.6.1, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v20.11.0
135+
>OS: macOS 14.7, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v22.11.0
136136
137137
Immer relies on auto-freeze to be enabled, if auto-freeze is disabled, Immer will have a huge performance drop and Mutative will have a huge performance lead, especially with large data structures it will have a performance lead of more than 50x.
138138

139-
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the16x performance gap between Mutative (`6,015 ops/sec`) and Immer (`382 ops/sec`).
139+
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the17x performance gap between Mutative (`6,747 ops/sec`) and Immer (`394 ops/sec`).
140140

141141
Overall, Mutative has a huge performance lead over Immer in[more performance testing scenarios](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/tree/main/test/performance). Run`yarn performance` to get all the performance results locally.
142142

‎benchmark.jpg‎

-26 Bytes
Loading
-26 Bytes
Loading

‎website/blog/releases/1.0/index.md‎

Lines changed: 12 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -94,34 +94,34 @@ const state = create(baseState, (draft) => {
9494

9595
>Mutative passed all of Immer's test cases.
9696
97-
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.0.11 vs Immer v10.1.1]
97+
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.1.0 vs Immer v10.1.1]
9898

9999
![Benchmark](img/benchmark.jpg)
100100

101101
```
102-
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,469 ops/sec ±0.82% (99 runs sampled)
103-
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,015 ops/sec ±1.17% (94 runs sampled)
104-
Immer - No Freeze x 5.36 ops/sec ±0.28% (18 runs sampled)
102+
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,670 ops/sec ±0.64% (96 runs sampled)
103+
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,747 ops/sec ±0.61% (95 runs sampled)
104+
Immer - No Freeze x 5.65 ops/sec ±1.53% (19 runs sampled)
105105
106-
Mutative - Freeze x959 ops/sec ±0.90% (99 runs sampled)
107-
Immer - Freeze x382 ops/sec ±0.53% (94 runs sampled)
106+
Mutative - Freeze x1,062 ops/sec ±0.74% (95 runs sampled)
107+
Immer - Freeze x394 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
108108
109-
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x970 ops/sec ±0.99% (96 runs sampled)
110-
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.22 ops/sec ±0.80% (18 runs sampled)
109+
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x1,011 ops/sec ±0.24% (98 runs sampled)
110+
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.64 ops/sec ±0.22% (19 runs sampled)
111111
112-
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x505 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
113-
Immer - Patches and Freeze x275 ops/sec ±0.49% (89 runs sampled)
112+
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x545 ops/sec ±1.19% (94 runs sampled)
113+
Immer - Patches and Freeze x215 ops/sec ±0.70% (86 runs sampled)
114114
115115
The fastest method is Mutative - No Freeze
116116
```
117117

118118
Run`yarn benchmark` to measure performance.
119119

120-
>OS: macOS 14.6.1, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v20.11.0
120+
>OS: macOS 14.7, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v22.11.0
121121
122122
Immer relies on auto-freeze to be enabled, if auto-freeze is disabled, Immer will have a huge performance drop and Mutative will have a huge performance lead, especially with large data structures it will have a performance lead of more than 50x.
123123

124-
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the16x performance gap between Mutative (`6,015 ops/sec`) and Immer (`382 ops/sec`).
124+
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the17x performance gap between Mutative (`6,747 ops/sec`) and Immer (`394 ops/sec`).
125125

126126
Overall, Mutative has a huge performance lead over Immer in[more performance testing scenarios](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/tree/main/test/performance).
127127

‎website/docs/extra-topics/comparison-with-immer.md‎

Lines changed: 12 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -26,33 +26,33 @@ Mutative has fewer bugs such as accidental draft escapes than Immer, [view detai
2626

2727
>Mutative passed all of Immer's test cases.
2828
29-
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.0.11 vs Immer v10.1.1]
29+
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.1.0 vs Immer v10.1.1]
3030

3131
![Benchmark](img/benchmark.jpg)
3232

3333
```
34-
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,469 ops/sec ±0.82% (99 runs sampled)
35-
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,015 ops/sec ±1.17% (94 runs sampled)
36-
Immer - No Freeze x 5.36 ops/sec ±0.28% (18 runs sampled)
34+
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,670 ops/sec ±0.64% (96 runs sampled)
35+
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,747 ops/sec ±0.61% (95 runs sampled)
36+
Immer - No Freeze x 5.65 ops/sec ±1.53% (19 runs sampled)
3737
38-
Mutative - Freeze x959 ops/sec ±0.90% (99 runs sampled)
39-
Immer - Freeze x382 ops/sec ±0.53% (94 runs sampled)
38+
Mutative - Freeze x1,062 ops/sec ±0.74% (95 runs sampled)
39+
Immer - Freeze x394 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
4040
41-
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x970 ops/sec ±0.99% (96 runs sampled)
42-
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.22 ops/sec ±0.80% (18 runs sampled)
41+
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x1,011 ops/sec ±0.24% (98 runs sampled)
42+
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.64 ops/sec ±0.22% (19 runs sampled)
4343
44-
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x505 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
45-
Immer - Patches and Freeze x275 ops/sec ±0.49% (89 runs sampled)
44+
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x545 ops/sec ±1.19% (94 runs sampled)
45+
Immer - Patches and Freeze x215 ops/sec ±0.70% (86 runs sampled)
4646
4747
The fastest method is Mutative - No Freeze
4848
```
4949

5050
Run`yarn benchmark` to measure performance.
5151

52-
>OS: macOS 14.6.1, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v20.11.0
52+
>OS: macOS 14.7, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v22.11.0
5353
5454
Immer relies on auto-freeze to be enabled, if auto-freeze is disabled, Immer will have a huge performance drop and Mutative will have a huge performance lead, especially with large data structures it will have a performance lead of more than 50x.
5555

56-
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the16x performance gap between Mutative (`6,015 ops/sec`) and Immer (`382 ops/sec`).
56+
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the17x performance gap between Mutative (`6,747 ops/sec`) and Immer (`394 ops/sec`).
5757

5858
Overall, Mutative has a huge performance lead over Immer in[more performance testing scenarios](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/tree/main/test/performance). Run`yarn performance` to get all the performance results locally.
-26 Bytes
Loading
-26 Bytes
Loading

‎website/docs/getting-started/performance.md‎

Lines changed: 12 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -82,34 +82,34 @@ const state = create(baseState, (draft) => {
8282

8383
>Mutative passed all of Immer's test cases.
8484
85-
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.0.11 vs Immer v10.1.1]
85+
Measure(ops/sec) to update 50K arrays and 1K objects, bigger is better([view source](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/blob/main/test/performance/benchmark.ts)).[Mutative v1.1.0 vs Immer v10.1.1]
8686

8787
![Benchmark](img/benchmark.jpg)
8888

8989
```
90-
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,469 ops/sec ±0.82% (99 runs sampled)
91-
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,015 ops/sec ±1.17% (94 runs sampled)
92-
Immer - No Freeze x 5.36 ops/sec ±0.28% (18 runs sampled)
90+
Naive handcrafted reducer - No Freeze x 4,670 ops/sec ±0.64% (96 runs sampled)
91+
Mutative - No Freeze x 6,747 ops/sec ±0.61% (95 runs sampled)
92+
Immer - No Freeze x 5.65 ops/sec ±1.53% (19 runs sampled)
9393
94-
Mutative - Freeze x959 ops/sec ±0.90% (99 runs sampled)
95-
Immer - Freeze x382 ops/sec ±0.53% (94 runs sampled)
94+
Mutative - Freeze x1,062 ops/sec ±0.74% (95 runs sampled)
95+
Immer - Freeze x394 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
9696
97-
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x970 ops/sec ±0.99% (96 runs sampled)
98-
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.22 ops/sec ±0.80% (18 runs sampled)
97+
Mutative - Patches and No Freeze x1,011 ops/sec ±0.24% (98 runs sampled)
98+
Immer - Patches and No Freeze x 5.64 ops/sec ±0.22% (19 runs sampled)
9999
100-
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x505 ops/sec ±0.85% (93 runs sampled)
101-
Immer - Patches and Freeze x275 ops/sec ±0.49% (89 runs sampled)
100+
Mutative - Patches and Freeze x545 ops/sec ±1.19% (94 runs sampled)
101+
Immer - Patches and Freeze x215 ops/sec ±0.70% (86 runs sampled)
102102
103103
The fastest method is Mutative - No Freeze
104104
```
105105

106106
Run`yarn benchmark` to measure performance.
107107

108-
>OS: macOS 14.6.1, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v20.11.0
108+
>OS: macOS 14.7, CPU: Apple M1 Max, Node.js:v22.11.0
109109
110110
Immer relies on auto-freeze to be enabled, if auto-freeze is disabled, Immer will have a huge performance drop and Mutative will have a huge performance lead, especially with large data structures it will have a performance lead of more than 50x.
111111

112-
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the16x performance gap between Mutative (`6,015 ops/sec`) and Immer (`382 ops/sec`).
112+
So if you are using Immer, you will have to enable auto-freeze for performance. Mutative is disabled auto-freeze by default. With the default configuration of both, we can see the17x performance gap between Mutative (`6,747 ops/sec`) and Immer (`394 ops/sec`).
113113

114114
Overall, Mutative has a huge performance lead over Immer in[more performance testing scenarios](https://github.com/unadlib/mutative/tree/main/test/performance). Run`yarn performance` to get all the performance results locally.
115115

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp