Repository files navigation

• Why are you using(0..8).into_par_iter() instead of(0..8),(0..8).into_iter(),(0..8).iter()? Isn't that "abusing" parallelism?

  First,Range<T> doesn't have aiter() method.Second,Range<T> is an iterator already sointo_iter() is redundant here.Third,ParallelIterator::flat_map() requires a closure that returns a type satisfyingIntoParallelIterator traitwhich, forMap<T>, is not implemented(E0277). Thus we must use.into_par_iter() in order to comply trait bounds.

  So even if it's labelled as "abuse", this is what the API forces.

• Why are youcollect()ing? Can't you usecollect_to_vec() or.enumerate().for_each() and collect to a custom buffer?

  First, to be a little bit fair to the C code. Second, no I can't becauseIntoIndexedParallelIterator is not implemented forFlatMap nor there is a way to turn it so.

This work is composed by means of attacking the Rust programming language community to point out theiramateurness in the field of parallel computing. I beg of you rustaceans, to stop conducting these actionsand pollute the field of computer science. Thank you.