Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

updating opencl multi_normal_cholesky_lpdf to match the other implementation#3021

Open
syclik wants to merge1 commit intodevelop
base:develop
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromfeature/cholesky_check

Conversation

syclik
Copy link
Member

Summary

#3002 missed checking cholesky factor for the opencl version of multi_normal_cholesky_lpdf.

This PR adds in thecheck_cholesky_factor. This should now pass the CI tests.

Tests

No new tests. There is a current test indevelop that fails when running with opencl.

Side Effects

None.

Release notes

Updating opencl multi_cholesky_normal_lpdf implementation to check that the input is a valid cholesky factor.

Checklist

  • Copyright holder: Daniel Lee

    The copyright holder is typically you or your assignee, such as a university or company. By submitting this pull request, the copyright holder is agreeing to the license the submitted work under the following licenses:
    - Code: BSD 3-clause (https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause)
    - Documentation: CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

  • the basic tests are passing

    • unit tests pass (to run, use:./runTests.py test/unit)
    • header checks pass, (make test-headers)
    • dependencies checks pass, (make test-math-dependencies)
    • docs build, (make doxygen)
    • code passes the built inC++ standards checks (make cpplint)
  • the code is written in idiomatic C++ and changes are documented in the doxygen

  • the new changes are tested

@SteveBronder
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we need an opencl version of check_cholesky_factor to have parity

@syclik
Copy link
MemberAuthor

syclik commentedFeb 12, 2024 via email

Yup! You're absolutely right. I'll get to it soon.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:01 AM Steve Bronder ***@***.***> wrote: I think we need an opencl version of check_cholesky_factor to have parity — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3021 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADH6F4I6OEKVHTVGNBIJPTYSJHXFAVCNFSM6AAAAABC3FIIRCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMZQGEZDKNZVGI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants
@syclik@SteveBronder

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp