Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

[Question] Support for PEP 779 in PythonNet (Free-threaded CPython)#2598

Unanswered
rkttu asked this question inQ&A
Discussion options

I’m wondering if there’s any ongoing discussion or future plan to support PEP 779 – Standardizing the C-API for Static Python Interpreters in Python.NET.

https://peps.python.org/pep-0779/

Since PEP 779 introduces changes and standardization around the use of Python’s C-API for static and embedded interpreter scenarios, it may have implications for how Python.NET interfaces with the runtime, especially in embedded or ahead-of-time compilation environments.

Some points for consideration:

  • Will Python.NET maintain compatibility with upcoming interpreter builds that implement PEP 779?
  • Are there potential integration benefits or limitations we should be aware of?
  • Could this impact hosting scenarios (e.g., .NET Core / NativeAOT + Python)?

I understand that PEP 779 is still in progress, but early evaluation might help ensure future compatibility and performance, especially thread safety issues.

Thanks for your work on this great project!

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 0 comments

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
1 participant
@rkttu

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp