Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

refactor: update botstrap to be more beginner-friendly#3417

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
onerandomusername wants to merge18 commits intopython-discord:main
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromonerandomusername:qt/beginner-friendly-botstrap

Conversation

@onerandomusername
Copy link
Contributor

@onerandomusernameonerandomusername commentedOct 21, 2025
edited
Loading

Update botstrap to be much more userfriendly. This silences noisy logs that we don't want to see or care about when downloading new server.

We also provide a success message when the entire system is successful.

I've also implemented some small caching in the botcore client to only make requests when necessary, and to only make one request to get all of the webhooks. While yes, webhooks are free, I left request logging enabled so the user could see what requests were made. I didn't see a good reason to silence those, both for transparency and because they already provide logging.

We also provide an invite link if the bot isn't in the guild already, but it is configured.

I've also added support which sets the app's flags to enable message content intents and member intent if they aren't already enabled.

closes#3414

Copy link
Member

@jb3jb3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Few review comments.

Can we also squash down the history a little bit? I don't think we need 21 commits for the changes here. Obviously keep the constants one separate but I think we can squash down a lot of the other ones.

@onerandomusernameonerandomusernameforce-pushed theqt/beginner-friendly-botstrap branch 5 times, most recently fromf5f2c3c toa61eb26CompareOctober 25, 2025 21:33
@onerandomusername
Copy link
ContributorAuthor

@jb3 I've compressed the history and addressed your comments in the updated history. Comments should now follow pep8, formatted with ruff, and silenced pyright.

Copy link
Member

@jb3jb3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Thanks for addressing review feedback.

Only a couple of points left now, but also a couple of wider points:

  • I think thewith block we use now to run the script is too long and I think things like the webhook management & emoji management should be moved into their own methods that we then call (the with should be as small as possible really).
  • The existing webhook if statement is still a bit scary (I thought I'd left a review comment but can't see/find it now!), I'd prefer creating a new method along the lines offind_matching_webhook, something like:
deffind_matching_webhook(existing_webhooks,webhook_model,formatted_name,channel_id):forhookinexisting_webhooks:ifhook["id"]==str(webhook_model.id):returnhook["id"]ifhook["name"]==formatted_nameandhook["channel_id"]==str(channel_id):returnhook["id"]returnNone

It's all just become a little bit too complex to follow under that context manager and I think that some splitting up into smaller more digestible methods is a good idea here.

Copy link
Member

@jb3jb3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Sorry for these comments all being in parts, just keep doing scans and picking up new bits.

Can we also standardise on whether you're using f-strings in this file or using%s interpolation? There is a mix currently (I appreciate it was f-strings before which is not correct, but if you're adding some f-strings and some %s strings we may as well unify).

- provide completion message- silence httpcore logger- filter out botcore's warning for patching send_typing- use short url for contributing link- only use logging.warning and up for things that need user action- use logging.fatal when exiting due to error- use % for all logging statements
@onerandomusernameonerandomusernameforce-pushed theqt/beginner-friendly-botstrap branch froma61eb26 to57c92b0CompareOctober 27, 2025 14:38
this lowers the amount of requests we make and reduces the chance of ratelimiting
* request all webhooks in a single call rather than per configured webhook* Enable support for multiple identical test botssharing the same webhookThis should prevent the limit of 10 webhooks per channel from being reachedwithout needing to share a specific guild configuration for the PyDisstaff test guild
this makes it easier to configure webhooks:we now only need to set their ID and not their channel.Setting the channel ID is only use for botstrap configuration, anyhow.
@onerandomusernameonerandomusernameforce-pushed theqt/beginner-friendly-botstrap branch from57c92b0 to82fa0b1CompareOctober 27, 2025 19:37
botstrap.py Outdated
Comment on lines 397 to 407
if (
# check the existing ID matches the configured one
existing_hook["id"]==str(webhook_model.id)
or (
# check if the name and the channel ID match the configured ones
existing_hook["name"]==formatted_webhook_name
andexisting_hook["channel_id"]==str(all_channels[webhook_name])
)
):
webhook_id=existing_hook["id"]
break
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I have commented every review this needs changing 🥲.

Split out to a helper method without the complex conditions. Also, comments should always have a capital (and only be present if they actually add something, for simple conditionals they generally don't).

deffind_matching_webhook(existing_webhooks,webhook_model,formatted_name,channel_id):forhookinexisting_webhooks:ifhook["id"]==str(webhook_model.id):returnhook["id"]ifhook["name"]==formatted_nameandhook["channel_id"]==str(channel_id):returnhook["id"]returnNone

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I sort of cleaned up this code but I'm not sure about the separate method with just how many specific inputs are required.

botstrap.py Outdated
Comment on lines 467 to 468
withbotstrap:
botstrap.run()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I'm not sure if this is the way this should be done or whether it'd be cleaner to create a DiscordClient here, pass it into the botstrap initialiser and then avoid having to define the__exit__ method for the BotStrapper class.

e.g.

withDiscordClient(guild_id=GUILD_ID)asdiscord_client:botstrap=BotStrapper(client=discord_client)

Copy link
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

I would prefer to manage the DiscordClient internally on the botstrap class, even if we use contextlib to manage the context manager.

DiscordClient should not be used by anything other than the BotStrap class, and an instance of it outside of botstrap doesn't need to exist.

botstrap.py Outdated
defcreate_forum_channel(self,channel_name_:str,category_id_:int|str|None=None)->str:
"""Creates a new forum channel."""
payload= {"name":channel_name_,"type":GUILD_FORUM_TYPE}
payload:dict[str,Any]= {"name":channel_name_,"type":GUILD_FORUM_TYPE}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

nitpick:dict[str, object] (avoid Any unless really necessary)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Any not necessary for these. +1

log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. Updated configuration has been written to %s",ENV_FILE)
else:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. No changes were necessary.")
sys.exit(changes_made)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Why exit with an error if we make changes? Makes sense for a linter, not for this.

vivekashok1221 reacted with thumbs up emoji
Comment on lines +475 to +480
withbotstrap:
changes_made=botstrap.run()
ifchanges_made:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. Updated configuration has been written to %s",ENV_FILE)
else:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. No changes were necessary.")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Space.

Suggested change
withbotstrap:
changes_made=botstrap.run()
ifchanges_made:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. Updated configuration has been written to %s",ENV_FILE)
else:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. No changes were necessary.")
withbotstrap:
changes_made=botstrap.run()
ifchanges_made:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. Updated configuration has been written to %s",ENV_FILE)
else:
log.info("Botstrap completed successfully. No changes were necessary.")

defget_emoji_contents(self,id_:str|int)->bytes|None:
"""Fetches the image data for an emoji by ID."""
# Emojis are located at https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/{emoji_id}.{ext}
response=self.get(f"{self.CDN_BASE_URL}/emojis/{id_!s}.webp")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Shouldn't fetch webp if you then submitimage/png, even if Discord is accepting it this doesn't seem right.

"""
# Fetch first to modify, not overwrite
current_flags=self.get_app_info().get("flags",0)
new_flags=current_flags|1<<15|1<<19
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

No magic values here.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@decorator-factorydecorator-factorydecorator-factory left review comments

@jb3jb3jb3 requested changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

More user friendly botstrap

3 participants

@onerandomusername@jb3@decorator-factory

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp