Loving this library and it's simplicity so far. I'm just wondering why have you decided to exposedispatch directly instead of adding some trivial mapping of dispatch.

What I would love to see is:

• useSubstate takes a secondary argumentactions which is either aobject or afunction
• Based on the type, call the actions with dispatch or simply bind the actions.

const mappedActions =    typeof actions === "function"      ? actions(store.dispatch)      : bindActionCreators(actions, store.dispatch);

• Return it asreturn [substate, mappedActions];

Would love to hear your feedback on this :-) This doesn't seem to complicate the implementation that much and just allows you to write out your actions directly in the hook itself.

E.g:

const [substate, actions] = useSubstate(    state => ({ count: state.count }),    dispatch => ({      increment: () => dispatch(increment()),      decrement: () => dispatch(decrement()),    })  );

or

const [substate, actions] = useSubstate(    state => ({ count: state.count }),    { increment, decrement }  );