- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1
Check this PR for review#1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
Review SummaryFile Changed: |
File Changed: |
Review for |
Markdown Collated Review:File Changed: |
File Changed: |
Review Comments for Pull RequestFile Changed: |
Reviews for Affected File: |
Pull Request Code ReviewReview SummaryThis review highlights several critical security vulnerabilities identified within Code Review by FileFile Changed: |
File Changed: |
Collated Reviews by FileFile Changed: |
Pull Request Review CommentsFile Changed: |
Review Compilation
|
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
Pull Request Code Reviews
|
Code ReviewFile Changed: |
Reviews Consolidated by File
|
File Changed: |
Collated Reviews by FileApiService.jsHard-Coded API Key and Public Exposure:Details: The code exposes a hard-coded API key that could be compromised if the code is made public or shared. API keys should never be hard-coded in source files. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Hard-coded API keyconstAPI_KEY='abc123xyz789'; Start Line: 5 Details: The code exposes sensitive information in a publicly exported variable that could be accessed by any part of the application or potentially exposed in client-side code. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Exposing sensitive information in a public variableexportconstPUBLIC_VARIABLE={apiEndpoint:'https://api.example.com',apiKey:API_KEY// This should not be exposed}; Start Line: 11 Insecure API Calls:Details: The insecureApiCall function sends the API key as a query parameter which is less secure than sending it in headers. Query parameters can be logged in various places like server logs, browser history, and proxy logs. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Insecure API call functionconstinsecureApiCall=async(endpoint)=>{try{constresponse=awaitaxios.get(`https://api.example.com${endpoint}?api_key=${API_KEY}`);returnresponse.data;}catch(error){console.error('API call failed:',error);throwerror;}}; Start Line: 34 Details: The function logs sensitive API key information to the console, which could be captured in logs or browser developer tools. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Function that might leak sensitive informationexportconstfetchUserDataInsecure=async(userId)=>{constresult=awaitinsecureApiCall(`/users/${userId}`);console.log('API Key used:',API_KEY);// This logs sensitive informationreturnresult;}; Start Line: 47 Details: The code inappropriately exports the insecureApiCall function, which makes an insecure pattern available throughout the application. Affected Code Snippet: export{secureApiCall,insecureApiCall}; Start Line: 59 DashboardLayout.jsDetails: The example uses inline styles with the Affected Code Snippet: <Paperstyle=https://github.com/patched-codes/example-javascript/pull/1/files#diff-d2127e59beafbce0ca6ffa908170393618ad60cf4f5529a3c8ed29c2371cd1e8> Start Line: 40 UserProfile.jsUnused State and State Management Issues:Details: Unused Redux state is being selected with eslint rules being disabled without proper justification. This creates potential performance issues and clutters the code. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Disabling eslint warning without proper justification// eslint-disable-next-lineconstunusedVariable=useSelector((state)=>state.user.someUnusedState); Start Line: 28 Details: The component manages user preferences in both local state and Redux store simultaneously, creating a potential source of bugs due to state inconsistency. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Using local state for data that should be in Reduxconst[userPreferences,setUserPreferences]=useState({theme:'light',notifications:true});// ...later in the handleSubmit function:// INCORRECT: Updating local state instead of ReduxsetUserPreferences({ ...userPreferences,theme:'dark'});// CORRECT: Updating Redux statedispatch(updateUserPreferences({theme:'dark'})); Start Line: 17 Details: The code fetches userDetails in useEffect but doesn't use it to populate the form inputs, creating a disconnect between Redux state and form state. This could lead to user confusion and data inconsistency. Affected Code Snippet: useEffect(()=>{// Simulating API call to fetch user detailsconstfetchUserDetails=async()=>{// ... fetch logicconstuserData={name:'John Doe',email:'john@example.com',bio:'Web developer'};dispatch(setUserDetails(userData));};fetchUserDetails();},[dispatch]);// No code to initialize formInputs with userDetails data Start Line: 31 DataProcessor.jsDetails: The code includes debug console.log statements that should not be pushed to production. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Console.log should be removed before pushingconsole.log('Data processed:',result); Start Line: 35 Details: The code includes a poorly named function that lacks clarity and specificity. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Poorly named function with unnecessary commentsconstdoStuff=(data)=>{// This function does stuff with the data// It does things to the data// Then it returns the resultreturndata.filter(x=>x.y==='z').sort((a,b)=>b.d-a.d);}; Start Line: 14 Details: The code contains commented-out code that should be removed before merging. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Commented out code should be removed// const oldResult = doStuff(rawData);// setProcessedData(oldResult); Start Line: 31 Details: The code includes an alternative rendering approach with poor practices as commented code which should be removed before merging. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Alternative rendering with poor practices// return (// <div>// <h2>Processed Data</h2>// {console.log('Rendering processed data')} {/* Remove console.log */}// <ul>// {processedData.map((item, index) => {// console.log('Rendering item:', item); // Remove console.log// return <li key={index}>{item.name}</li>; // Use item.id instead of index for key// })}// </ul>// </div>// ); Start Line: 47 Details: There's a potential security vulnerability in the Affected Code Snippet: constdoStuff=(data)=>{// This function does stuff with the data// It does things to the data// Then it returns the resultreturndata.filter(x=>x.y==='z').sort((a,b)=>b.d-a.d);}; Start Line: 14 catalogueIndex.jsDetails: File naming doesn't follow the established convention. React component files should start with a capital letter. The file should be renamed to Affected Code Snippet: // File: catalogueIndex.js// INCORRECT: File name doesn't follow the convention (should start with capital letter) Start Line: 1 Details: State variable uses snake_case instead of camelCase, which is the standard in JavaScript and React. This deviates from the coding standards used elsewhere in the file. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Poor state namingconst[is_open,setIs_open]=useState(false); Start Line: 14 Details: Function name doesn't follow the descriptive naming convention used elsewhere in the component. The function name 'doStuff' is not descriptive of its purpose and lacks essential documentation for complex logic. Affected Code Snippet: // INCORRECT: Poor function naming and no comment for complex logicconstdoStuff=(x)=>{dispatch(setCurrentProduct(x));setIs_open(true);}; Start Line: 29 Details: Parameter naming lacks descriptive context. Using single letter variables like 'x' reduces code readability and maintainability, especially when other parts of the code use descriptive parameter names like 'productId'. Affected Code Snippet: constdoStuff=(x)=>{dispatch(setCurrentProduct(x));setIs_open(true);}; Start Line: 29 Details: Inconsistent modal state management. The component uses two different state variables ( Affected Code Snippet: // CORRECT: State naming conventionconst[isProductModalOpen,setIsProductModalOpen]=useState(false);// INCORRECT: Poor state namingconst[is_open,setIs_open]=useState(false); Start Line: 12 |
Markdown ReviewFile Changed: |
Pull Request Code ReviewFile: |
Pull Request ReviewIssues Identified in |
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
Review Comments - Pull RequestFile Changed: |
File Changed: |
CTY-git commentedMay 23, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Code ReviewApiService.jsHardcoding API keys directly in the code is a major security vulnerability. API keys should be stored securely, preferably in environment variables or a secrets management system. Exposing the API key in a public variable makes it easily accessible to anyone who can view the code. This is a critical security risk. Including the API key directly in the URL is another way to expose it, as it can be easily intercepted or logged. Logging the API key to the console exposes it to anyone who has access to the browser's developer tools or server logs. DataProcessor.jsindex.jsDashboardLayout.js |
File Changed: |
Pull Request ReviewFile Changed: |
Pull Request Code Review ReportFile Changed: |
File: |
Collated Reviews by Affected FileFile Changed: |
File Changed: |
Review of Pull RequestAffected File: |
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
File Changed: |
No description provided.