- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork1k
feat: add type to issues#484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
1cc956c
toe733f06
CompareThank you for trying this. I am concerned that there isn't a good story for how the LLM should discover what options are available for this field. I'd propose an enum, but users can add additional types so that would be insufficient. We will have to think about this. |
1 similar comment
Thank you for trying this. I am concerned that there isn't a good story for how the LLM should discover what options are available for this field. I'd propose an enum, but users can add additional types so that would be insufficient. We will have to think about this. |
radar07 commentedJun 8, 2025 • edited
Loading Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
edited
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
I agree. We also might need to support SupportingCRUD operations of IssueType would assist the model to discover the list of types and assigning them. |
Closes:#409