Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Bring Python telemetry event model consistent with JDBC#701

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account

Open
nikhilsuri-db wants to merge4 commits intomain
base:main
Choose a base branch
Loading
fromPECOBLR-1048

Conversation

@nikhilsuri-db
Copy link

@nikhilsuri-dbnikhilsuri-db commentedOct 29, 2025
edited
Loading

What type of PR is this?

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Other

Description

As part of telemetry readiness in python sdk and bring it in parity with JDBC telemetry we are adding data models and fields that are missing in current python telemetry event.

This PR aims to complete the model mismatch between both python and JDBC
Also, populates fields like missing connection param, correcting default flush interval

How is this tested?

  • Unit tests
  • E2E Tests
  • Manually
  • N/A

Related Tickets & Documents

Details

Signed-off-by: Nikhil Suri <nikhil.suri@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Suri <nikhil.suri@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Suri <nikhil.suri@databricks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Suri <nikhil.suri@databricks.com>
_flush_thread=None
_flush_event=threading.Event()
_flush_interval_seconds=90
_flush_interval_seconds=300# 5 minutes

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

This is align with JDBC configuration

returnself._proxy_pool_managerisnotNone

@property
defproxy_uri(self)->Optional[str]:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more.

Are there any security implications of exposing the proxy URI?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account?Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@jprakash-dbjprakash-dbAwaiting requested review from jprakash-db

@vikrantpuppalavikrantpuppalaAwaiting requested review from vikrantpuppala

@samikshya-dbsamikshya-dbAwaiting requested review from samikshya-db

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@nikhilsuri-dbnikhilsuri-db

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@nikhilsuri-db

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp