- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork926
chore: remove unnecessary redeclarations in for loops (part 2)#18593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to ourterms of service andprivacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?Sign in to your account
base:main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes fromall commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -408,9 +408,6 @@ func (m *Manager) AllPrimary() []database.Replica { | ||
continue | ||
} | ||
Comment on lines -411 to -413 MemberAuthor There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others.Learn more. @johnstcn you called out this one as potentially being a concern, but I think there are already two "copies" happening here that make this safe
ie. go does nothave "references", it has pointers and values. you're either copying a pointer or you're copying the whole value. here's a go playground that hopefully instills confidencehttps://go.dev/play/p/MfFltxQepYE | ||
replicas = append(replicas, replica) | ||
} | ||
return replicas | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading.Please reload this page.