Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


XDA Forums
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use analternative browser.

Nexus 5 max wifi speed?

Search This thread
By:

j'vai

Senior Member
Apr 23, 2014
164
28
wash dc
The WIFI chip, because of size constraints was limited to how many streams it can handle since it does other duties too (I think Bluetooth and maybe others). The older phones (Nexus 4 and others) also had 1x1 spatial streams but were limited to 20mhz so that's why their max was 75Mbps (or some 72Mbps which some routers will show). The Nexus 5 has a 40mhz chip so it can link at faster rates. Using iPerf I think doesn' send TCP ACKs so that's why they were able to get 136Mbps which is close to the theoretical 150Mbps (or 144Mbps). In the real world however you wont get anything close to that as the internet works on TCP so it has to ACKnowledge every transmission which slows down reception of new data.

1x1 is relating to the spatial streams that a chip can handle..

In order to send faster speeds the device sends and receives streams at the same time. This is why new routers have 3 physical antennas, each connected to a radio (those are 3x3 ones).

In the N spec, each radio can send at a max of 75Mbps using 20Mhz of bandwidth. When you double that to 40Mhz you get 150Mbps. This is why 3x3 routers can do 450Mbps (vs 300Mbps).

The AC routers use the same layout (of 3x3) but because of their better tech (encoding, compression and such) they can put more information within the same bandwidth (20, 40Mhz) and they can use more of it as well since 802.11AC is in the 5Ghz range. They can then use 80Mhz channels as well.

So for AC per spatial stream is about 86Mbps per 20mhz.

So for AC you get 3x3 x 80mhz = 1.3Gbps (1.286Gbps) or only 600Mbps for 40mhz wide channel.

http://www.merunetworks.com/products/technology/80211ac/

There's a chart on that page which breaks it down a bit more as well as more info.

-------------------------
As for which it decides to use that depends on a few things.

- If you have the same SSID/Password on both then it will use the stronger signal

- IF you have different ones then it will use whichever you specify till it can't anymore then it will jump onto the next known connection (that is if you have both saved)

- If you only specify 1 frequency to use then it will use that:p


SYN,SYN - ACK,ACK


the nexus 5 lacks this networking protocol & in turn limits it full DL capabilities?

dam, i need the traffic sniff it on my wifi when i get home, i didn't know this..
 

shotta35

Senior Member
Nov 30, 2008
1,578
449
NYC & Germany
so there is no solution for low link speed?
I have 150M router, my laptop connects at 150 but Nexus 5 connects at 72-65
I transfer files wirelessly from laptop to my device but it very slow:(

The solution is to use a AC router where the Nexus 5 can connect or LINK at a faster speed - in the 400Mbps range.
 
  • Like
Reactions:kamilmirza
Sinfamy

Sinfamy

Senior Member
Aug 15, 2011
234
63
steamcommunity.com
AC68U

Sent via Telnet
 

Attachments

  • 1405774098266.jpg
    1405774098266.jpg
    32.5 KB · Views: 984

Konstigt

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2010
322
31
Thanks for sharing that. Could you try iperf? If you have a fast enough computer to try to. Preferably the server runs on wired LAN.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I got around 250Mbps with a 433Mbps connection towards my ASUS RT-AC66U. Very fast!

(compared to my MBP which gets 360Mbps on a 866Mbps connection to the AP)
 

richcherry

New member
Jan 15, 2015
1
0
WiFi device number reduces bandwidth

The solution is to use a AC router where the Nexus 5 can connect or LINK at a faster speed - in the 400Mbps range.

I upgraded to 300mb Time Warner (actually I had their highest speed when I got it and they just kept increasing the limit) at home and ran into the WiFi bandwidth divided by device number issue: On WiFi (unlike direct Ethernet connections) the max bandwidth if the access point is divided by the number of devices connected regardless of whether the are using the bandwidth. So a Ruckus wireless AP that can handle 450mb in my house but has 4 laptops, 5 mobile devices, a couple of printers, an apple tv, a WeMo light switch, and a couple other misc devices can only give each device about 25-30 MB max depending on how many are turned on. If I plug directly into the router via Ethernet with any of those devices I can exceed 300mb via a test site.

I also run a tech conference and find that when 500 people are onsite they use about 1200 ip addresses as each person has 2-3 devices that are generally on and connected to the wifi even though they are not being used... so I need to have 6-8 2X2 AP's to keep it providing a minimal amount of bandwidth to each even though the technical specs on the AP's say they can support 250 users each.

So to improve things at home I setup one AP that had a special SSID that I use for mobile high speed and only connect 1 device to it at a time. So the idea that an AC router will give you better speed is right but only if you limit the devices connected.
 

BinkXDA

Senior Member
Mar 1, 2012
388
137
I upgraded to 300mb Time Warner (actually I had their highest speed when I got it and they just kept increasing the limit) at home and ran into the WiFi bandwidth divided by device number issue: On WiFi (unlike direct Ethernet connections) the max bandwidth if the access point is divided by the number of devices connected regardless of whether the are using the bandwidth. So a Ruckus wireless AP that can handle 450mb in my house but has 4 laptops, 5 mobile devices, a couple of printers, an apple tv, a WeMo light switch, and a couple other misc devices can only give each device about 25-30 MB max depending on how many are turned on. If I plug directly into the router via Ethernet with any of those devices I can exceed 300mb via a test site.
This is not true. I too am quite familiar with Wi-Fi—I’ve done Ruckus, Aruba and Cisco deployments—and 20 devices on a 450Mbps connection doesn’t mean the maximum bandwidth of a single device will be 22.5Mbps (theoretical). If all 20 devices are heavily using the connection then this will definitely be the case (the speed will actually be lower for various reasons), but if most of them are idle a single client will be able to use more than 22.5Mbps (granted there are other factors at play here as well).

So to improve things at home I setup one AP that had a special SSID that I use for mobile high speed and only connect 1 device to it at a time. So the idea that an AC router will give you better speed is right but only if you limit the devices connected.
Assuming this SSID is on the same Wi-Fi channel as the other, you’ll experience similarly reduced throughput.
 
Last edited:
kamilmirza

kamilmirza

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2011
1,886
1,534
OnePlus 6
Did anyone succeed of having real AC on their Nexus 5? 72 MHz on 2,4 GHz radio and 433 on 5 Ghz? is that really max theoretical speed for this phone?
In my mind 2,4 GHz should do 150 mbps as other Wifi N 1x1 adapters do it? Maybe anyone has solution to this question? Has anyone succeed having better speed than 72 mbps on 2,4 Ghz or was able to get dual band at the same time?

have you even read this thread?
 

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 6
    what do you mean with "it's a 1x1 radio"? If I have a router which has both 2.4 ghz and 5 ghz, how does it decide which band will it work with?:confused:

    The WIFI chip, because of size constraints was limited to how many streams it can handle since it does other duties too (I think Bluetooth and maybe others). The older phones (Nexus 4 and others) also had 1x1 spatial streams but were limited to 20mhz so that's why their max was 75Mbps (or some 72Mbps which some routers will show). The Nexus 5 has a 40mhz chip so it can link at faster rates. Using iPerf I think doesn' send TCP ACKs so that's why they were able to get 136Mbps which is close to the theoretical 150Mbps (or 144Mbps). In the real world however you wont get anything close to that as the internet works on TCP so it has to ACKnowledge every transmission which slows down reception of new data.

    1x1 is relating to the spatial streams that a chip can handle..

    In order to send faster speeds the device sends and receives streams at the same time. This is why new routers have 3 physical antennas, each connected to a radio (those are 3x3 ones).

    In the N spec, each radio can send at a max of 75Mbps using 20Mhz of bandwidth. When you double that to 40Mhz you get 150Mbps. This is why 3x3 routers can do 450Mbps (vs 300Mbps).

    The AC routers use the same layout (of 3x3) but because of their better tech (encoding, compression and such) they can put more information within the same bandwidth (20, 40Mhz) and they can use more of it as well since 802.11AC is in the 5Ghz range. They can then use 80Mhz channels as well.

    So for AC per spatial stream is about 86Mbps per 20mhz.

    So for AC you get 3x3 x 80mhz = 1.3Gbps (1.286Gbps) or only 600Mbps for 40mhz wide channel.

    http://www.merunetworks.com/products/technology/80211ac/

    There's a chart on that page which breaks it down a bit more as well as more info.

    -------------------------
    As for which it decides to use that depends on a few things.

    - If you have the same SSID/Password on both then it will use the stronger signal

    - IF you have different ones then it will use whichever you specify till it can't anymore then it will jump onto the next known connection (that is if you have both saved)

    - If you only specify 1 frequency to use then it will use that:p
    2
    i believe hardware wise it's 300 mbps for the nexus 5
    but there are not that many servers or routers that will give you this.
    i test off a gig server for speedtest, not sure what FCC uses.
    i have gig fiber and a netgear R7000 router
    2

    Do you mean with an Access point / Range extender?

    It really depends on the hardware you have. I have a TP Link range extender and set it up to use the same SSID. This should mean that it is simply extending the distance of the original broadcast from the router and essentially, I am connecting to my main router, although in practice that does not seem to be the case. When I sit in between the router and the extender, I sometimes can see my signal is low because I am actually connecting to the extender rather than the nearer router and WiFi access seems much slower.

    I do have the choice of setting it with a different SSID and in the case of a Windows laptop for example, I could set one as a Preferred network, so it will always connect to SSID1 unless not in range and it would connect to SSID2.

    At the moment, I am struggling with the range extender set up though.

    Edit, oh just seen what you were quoting the first time round. Same sort of answer though. If you connect to the 5GHz and the 2.4GHz became stronger, it wouldn't auto switch
    1
    Wow. Actually 300Mbps from a Nexus 5? What does your Link speed show for your SSID? I don't think I've seen my Nexus 5 with a Link speed over 150Mbps, and this is on a 5GHz Access Point that my notebook connects to at 300Mbps.
    it still drops to 40 mbps due to nexus 5/avdroid bug. have turn off/on wifi to fix a couple of times a day
    1
    Thanks for all the info, I have to reread it because I didn't understand all of it hahaha, what do you mean with if they have the same password? you mean the router and the modem?

    Your 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz frequencies on the router can have 2 different SSIDs or the same. Most people use different ones as a way to identify them but also doesn't allow roaming between them since the device will see it as a separate network.

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp