• 2008 - 2010
• 2010 - 2018
• 2019 - 2024

Hi Ultimateria, hope you're doing well! I just wanted to give you some more context about what Stríðsdrengur seemed to be referring to inthis edit. We just got down to the bottom of it in the Wiktionary Discord server, and it seems like Stríðsdrengur held a private vote in the AGP server about whether or not to include you: with the title of "Tirar [...] Ultimateria da Aliança". However, a screenshot was provided from another user in said server that showed that the "vote" was 2-1-3 Sim-Não-Não sei, and most users from said group stated that they did not support the "removal." I personally take no position on the group or the block, but I just wanted to provide more context, since I don't believe you're active in the Discord group.AG202 (talk)05:28, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@AG202: Thanks for the context. I was wondering what "a decisão já foi tomada" meant.Ultimateria (talk)20:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Curious why you deleted this. Easy enough to verify the term, though it might be moved toLüder line with an umlaut [e.g. John E. Hatch, 1984, Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy, p.129]. Forms with an s, apostrophe s, and 'band' in place of 'line' are all fairly common, so maybe justLüder would be best. It seems that no form of the term appears on Wk.kwami (talk)23:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Kwamikagami: I've restored it and moved it toLüders band.Ultimateria (talk)05:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.kwami (talk)05:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

When you're hiding edits by an account with an unacceptable username, always remember to hide the edit summary on any rollback, since it includes the account name that made the edits. It's easy to forget, since you can't hide the content of the current revision and thus can't hide both the reverted edits and the rollback at the same time. You probably knew that already, but I thought I'd mention it as a reminder.Chuck Entz (talk)01:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Got it, thank you.Ultimateria (talk)03:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks u.ɶLerman (talk)08:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

I contest your deletion of those pages, and have re-created them. In particular, I believe speedy deletion was misused. Speedy deletion is for vandalism or otherwise obvious junk, and that was not the case. "Is this legit?", the nominator's rationale, is NOT a rationale for speedy deletion. Doesn't help that it was probably Wonderfool who tagged for speedy deletion. You're welcome to tag them for RfD or whatever, but please DO NOT SPEEDY them again.Purplebackpack8914:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Purplebackpack89: As someone pointed out atTalk:the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral, these phrases don't appear to be used on their own. Speedy deletion has multiple uses and I don't appreciate you trying to explain it to me considering I've been an admin for over 15 years. "Unwanted redirect" was the rationaleI gave, and I stand by that, but I'm certain I won't convince you so I'd rather just drop the issue.Ultimateria (talk)16:42, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

He's recreated them. Please delete and salt.2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:812E:E390:CD0C:A43F16:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Why? The only person who's explicitly given any reason to delete them is you, 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:812E:E390:CD0C:A43F (90-99% sure you're WonderFool, btw) I literally said I was going to recreate them and why about. It shouldn't be SALTed without an RfD discussion; and I've created one to restore them. And it was inappropriate for Knight to call it "vandalism"Purplebackpack8912:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

For the record, is was the IP who called you a vandal, not Theknightwho.Ultimateria (talk)20:22, 12 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Knight said "it was a vandal who created it" in his deletion summary. Wouldn't be the first time Knight tried to start a fight...Purplebackpack8921:17, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking at the deleted edit history and I assure you it was the IP who wrote "This phrase is never used alone, as discussed at RFV/RFD -- note a vandal keeps recreating it -- please protect". The reason it shows up in the deletion notice is because it was part of the page's content, in this case the deletion template that the IP added.Ultimateria (talk)00:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Whoever this is has been creating odd unformatted stubs for historical alternative spellings. I've sort of fixed the formatting, but I don't trust this person's knowledge or judgment when it comes to what these spellings really are. It would take me a long time to get up to speed on the subject matter, so I thought you would be better suited to sort through their edits. Thanks!Chuck Entz (talk)01:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Chuck Entz: I've deleted some pages that appear to be inventions, moved one, and touched up others. All that remains is the suspect AbkhazАлаҳә лԥа.Ultimateria (talk)21:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Yeh, I know thathere I should add{{citations}}. I'm not gonna do it though, it'll be done automatically one day. I'm playing the long gameVealhurl (talk)21:20, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The problem is they're not English by default, so someone still has to figure out the language.Ultimateria (talk)22:09, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

We need more AI here. I'm always the solution, never the problem.Vealhurl (talk)22:10, 2 October 2025 (UTC)Reply