The following information has failedWiktionary's deletion process (permalink ).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Rfd-redundant: “(reflexive) to commit suicide”
Not a distinct sense, just the primary sense (“to kill”) used with a reflexive pronoun (“oneself”). —Ungoliant (falai ) 18:16, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Reply
Personally, I think it might be appropriate as a subsense. —Μετάknowledge discuss /deeds 18:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Reply From what I understand, I would delete it as redundant to 'to kill' with specific pronoun 'se'.Renard Migrant (talk )20:34, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Reply Delete , not a separate sense, maybe add as one of the examples of sense #1.Siuenti (talk )20:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC) Reply It's one of those if you just removed it unilaterally I don't think anyone wouldbat an eyelid .Renard Migrant (talk )11:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC) Reply You’re right. Too late now. —Ungoliant (falai ) 12:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC) Reply Absolutelykeep . I don't understand the reasoning. You can say the say of almost all reflexive verbs; it's normal in translating dictionaries to translate the reflexive sense separately, especially when, as here, there is a different common translation.Ƿidsiþ 12:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Reply That’s not true at all. If that were true, every Portuguese-English dictionary would suddenly have twice as many senses for transitive verbs. —Ungoliant (falai ) 16:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Reply Not so really; dictionaries won't list Frenchse tuer separately totuer because the translation is the same ("to kill") just the direct object isse . Not lexically any different totuer un homme ( “ to kill a man ” ) which simply has a different direct object.Renard Migrant (talk )17:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Reply Delete Otherwise, why don't we have a reflexive sense atkill ? In this caseoneself is pretty much analogous tose . See alsoTalk:kill oneself .Chuck Entz (talk )18:23, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Reply Delete --Daniel Carrero (talk )17:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC) Reply Delete per nom.- -sche (discuss) 22:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Reply