• -ānus,-ēnus,-ernus,-iānus,-īnus,-rnus,-ūnus,-urnus(enlargements)

• (Classical Latin)IPA^(key): /nus/,[nʊs̠]
• (modern Italianate Ecclesiastical)IPA^(key): /nus/,[nus]

FromProto-Italic*-nos, fromProto-Indo-European*-nós.

-nus (feminine-na,neuter-num);first/second-declension suffix

1. adjective-forming suffix

The suffix-nus appears in various derived adjectives, including relational adjectives to nouns such asquernus(“oaken”),salignus(“willow”) (fromquercus(“oak”),salix(“willow”)) ormāternus(“maternal”),paternus(“paternal”) (frommāter(“mother”),pater(“father”)).

In terms of etymology, it also occurs in various inherited adjectives or nouns (some derived from Proto-Indo-European verbal bases), such as the following:

magnus

plēnus

tribūnus

lignum

tignum

Through rebracketing (e.g. reanalysis oftribū-nus, from theu-stem nountribus, astrib-ūnus), it gave rise to a number of variant suffixes, such as-ānus or-īnus, some of which show greater productivity in Latin than bare-nus.

First/second-declension adjective.

Ultimately the same as the above, but apparently rebracketed at some point as*-sno- (extracted from words like*tris-no-, the original form ofternus).

-nus (feminine-na,neuter-num);first/second-declension suffix

1. suffix used to form distributive numerals

In pre-Latin, the suffix*-nos (Classical Latin-nus) was attached to numeral adverbs, cardinal numerals, or numeral stems to formdistributive numerals, such as

‎*dwis(“twice”) + ‎*-no- → ‎*dwisno-^[1] →bīnus(“two each”) (equivalent tobis +‎-nus).

‎*tris(“thrice”) + ‎*-no- → ‎*trisno-^[2] →tr̥sno- →tr̥no- →ternus(“three each”) (equivalent toter +‎-nus).

*quaturs(“four times”)^[3] →‎*quatrus + ‎*-no- → ‎*quatrusno- →quatr̥sno- →quatr̥no- →quaternus(“four each”) (equivalent toquater +‎-nus).

‎*seks(“six”) + ‎*-no- → ‎*seksno- →sēnus(“six each”) (equivalent tosex +‎-nus).

At some point in pre-Latin, the suffix seems to have become extended to*-sno-, presumably as the result of rebracketing of forms like*tris-no- as*tri-sno-,^[2]*dwis-no- as*dwi-sno- or*seks-no- as*sek(s)-sno-.^[4] By the time of Classical Latin,*-s- before*-n- had been lost by regular sound change, but it caused any preceding nasal or plosive consonants to be deleted and the preceding vowel to be lengthened. Thus, it can be inferred that the*-sno- variant of the suffix was used to form words like the following:

‎septem(“seven”) + ‎*-sno- → ‎*septem-sno- →septēnus(“seven each”).

‎novem(“nine”) + ‎*-sno- → ‎*novem-sno- →novēnus(“nine each”).

‎dec(em)(“ten”) + ‎*-sno- → ‎*deksno- →dēnus(“ten each”).

The-ēno- found in decades such asvīcēnus,trīcēnus probably developed from-ent-sno-.^[5]

Then the ending-ēnus seems to have been extended from some of the above forms and used as a third allomorph of this suffix to form some of the other distributive numerals:

‎centum(“hundred”) + ‎-ēnus → ‎centēnus(“one hundred each”)

‎septingentī(“seven hundred”) + ‎-ēnus → ‎septingentēnus(“seven hundred each”) (alternative form ofseptingēnus)

‎mille(“thousand”) + ‎-ēnus → ‎millēnus(“one thousand each”)

‎quot(“how many”) + ‎-ēnus → ‎quotēnus(“how many each”)

First/second-declension adjective (distributive, normally plural-only; short genitive plurals in-num preferred).

Via-ēnus:

• Catalan:-è
• Old Spanish:-eno

• Sihler, Andrew L. (1995)New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press,→ISBN
• Palmer, L.R. (1906) The Latin Language, London, Faber and Faber

• Latin 1-syllable words
• Latin terms with IPA pronunciation
• Latin terms derived from Proto-Indo-European
• Latin terms derived from Proto-Italic
• Latin terms inherited from Proto-Italic
• Latin terms inherited from Proto-Indo-European
• Latin lemmas
• Latin suffixes
• Latin adjective-forming suffixes
• Latin first and second declension suffixes

• Latin entries with etymology texts
• Pages with entries
• Pages with 1 entry
• Pages using catfix