Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Zhonghua minzu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Political term in modern Chinese nationalism
This article is about the modern concept in Chinese nationalism. For the general concept of peoples relating to China, seeChinese people. For the dominant Chinese ethnic group, seeHan Chinese. For a list of ethnicities in modern China, seeList of ethnic groups in China. For a list of ethnicities in historical China, seeEthnic groups in Chinese history.
For other uses, seeChinese nationality.

This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Zhonghua minzu" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(July 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
icon
This articleis missing information about "revival" / "rejuvenation" (复兴) of the Chinese nation. Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on thetalk page.(January 2021)
This articleshould specify the language of its non-English content using{{lang}} or{{langx}},{{transliteration}} for transliterated languages, and{{IPA}} for phonetic transcriptions, with an appropriateISO 639 code. Wikipedia'smultilingual support templates may also be used.See why.(July 2025)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
A map of China in multiple colours showing the ethnic minorities in each region.
A map of China showing the ethnic minorities in each region. Collectively, these ethnic minorities (as well as the Han majority) are considered part of theZhonghua minzu.
Zhonghua minzu
Traditional Chinese中華民族
Simplified Chinese中华民族
Literal meaningChineseminzu[note 1]
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu PinyinZhōnghuá mínzú
Bopomofoㄓㄨㄥ ㄏㄨㄚˊ ㄇㄧㄣˊ ㄗㄨˊ
Gwoyeu RomatzyhJonghwa Mintzwu
Wade–GilesChung1-hua2 min2-tsu2
Tongyong PinyinJhong-huá Mín-zú
IPA[ʈʂʊ́ŋ.xwǎ mǐn.tsǔ]
Wu
Wenzhounese
Romanisation
cion5 gho2 men2 yeu8
Suzhounesetson5 wa2 min2 zoq8
Gan
RomanizationZung1 fa4 min4 zuk6
Hakka
Romanizationzhung24 fa11 min11 zuk5
Yue: Cantonese
JyutpingZung1-waa4 man4 zuk6
IPA[tsʊŋ˥ wa˩ mɐn˩ tsʊk̚˨]
Southern Min
Tâi-lôTiong-hûa bîn-cök
Part of a series on
Names of China



  • 神州
    • Divine land








Zhonghua minzu is a political term in modernChinese nationalism related to the concepts ofnation-building,ethnicity, andrace in the Chinesenationality. Collectively, the term refers to the56 ethnic groups of China, but being a part of theZhonghua minzu does not mean one must haveChinese nationality (Chinese:中国国籍;pinyin:Zhōngguó guójí) and thus have an obligation to be loyal to thePeople's Republic of China (PRC).[4][5][6][7][8]

TheRepublic of China (ROC) of theBeiyang (1912–1927) period developed the term to describeHan Chinese (hanzu) and four other major ethnic groups (theManchus,Mongols,Hui, andTibetans)[9][10] based onFive Races Under One Union. Conversely,Sun Yat-sen and theKuomintang (KMT) envisioned it as a unified composite of Han and non-Han people.[11][non-primary source needed]

The PRC adoptedZhonghua minzu after thedeath of Mao Zedong. It was used to describe the Han Chinese and other ethnic groups as a collective Chinese family.[4][7] Since the late 1980s,Zhonghua minzu (中华民族; 'the Chinese nation') replaced the termZhongguo renmin (中国人民; 'the Chinese people'), signalling a shift of nationality and minority policy from amultinational communistpeople's statehoodof China to one multi-ethnic Chinesenation state with one single Chinesenational identity.[8]

Woman wearing acheongsam orqipao, a typical ethnic fusion dress of Manchu origin absorbing Han andMongol styles.

History

[edit]
See also:Legacy of the Qing dynasty,Names of the Qing dynasty, andHistory of the Republic of China

An older proto-nationalist term throughout Chinese history wasHuaxia, but the immediate roots of theZhonghua minzu lie in theQing dynasty founded by theManchu clanAisin Gioro in what is todayNortheast China.[12] The Qing Emperors sought to portray themselves as ideal Confucian rulers for theHan Chinese,Bogda Khans for theMongols, andChakravartin kings forTibetan Buddhists.[13]

Lizheng Gate (麗正門) at theChengde Mountain Resort. On the sign hanging over the gate there is written the letters used in the Qing Dynasty. From the left:Mongolianscript,ChagataiArabic script,Chinese,Tibetan, andManchurian.[14] These five languages are collectively referred to as "Chinese languages".

Dulimbai gurun (ᡩᡠᠯᡳᠮᠪᠠᡳ
ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ
) is the Manchu name for China. It has the same meaning as the Chinese nameZhongguo (中國; 'Middle kingdom').[15][16][17] The Qing adopted the Han Chinese imperial model[18] but considered the Manchu and Chinese names for "China" to be equivalent. It used "China" to describe the entirety of the state and its territory regardless of ethnic composition. The 'Chinese language' (Dulimbai gurun i bithe) referred to Chinese, Manchu, and Mongol languages.Zhongguo zhi ren (中國之人;ᡩᡠᠯᡳᠮᠪᠠᡳ
ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ ‍ᡳ
ᠨᡳᠶᠠᠯᠮᠠ
Dulimbai gurun-i niyalma 'Chinese people') referred to all Han, Manchu, and Mongol subjects of the Qing.[19] The Qing used phrases likeZhongwai yijia (中外一家) orneiwai yijia (內外一家; 'interior and exterior as one family') to portray itself as a unifying force between the "inner" Han Chinese and the "outer" non-Han like the Mongols and Tibetans.[20]

These terms were used in official documents. "China" was commonly used in international communications and treaties such as theTreaty of Nanking.[18] A Manchu language memorial usedDulimbai gurun to proclaim the1759 conquest of Dzungaria.[21][22][23] A Manchu language version of a treaty with the Russian Empire concerning criminal jurisdiction over bandits called people from the Qing as "people of the central kingdom (Dulimbai gurun)".[24][25][26][27] In the Manchu officialTulisen's Manchu languageaccount of his meeting with theTorghut Mongol leaderAyuka Khan, it was mentioned that while the Torghuts were unlike the Russians, the "people of the Central Kingdom" (dulimba-i gurun) were like the Torghut Mongols, and the "people of the Central Kingdom" referred to the Manchus.[28]

Liang Qichao, who put forward the concept ofZhonghua minzu

Beforenationalism, loyalty was generally to thecity-state, thefeudal fief and its lord or, in the case of China, to adynastic state.[29] SomeHan nationalists such asSun Yat-sen initially described the Manchus as "foreign invaders" to be expelled,[30] and planned to establish a Hannation-state modelled closely after Germany and Japan; this was discarded because alienating non-Han groups potentially meant the loss of imperial territory.[citation needed] This development in Chinese thinking was mirrored in the expansion of the meaning of the termZhonghua minzu to encompassFive Races Under One Union based on Qing ethnic categories; the term was originally created by the late-Qing philologistLiang Qichao and only referred to theHan Chinese.[31][32] This revision ofZhonghua minzu was used as early as 1912 by theRepublic of China to supports claims of sovereignty over all Qing territories.[citation needed] By 1920,Sun Yat-sen also supported the creation of a "Chinese nation" from the various ethnic groups.[33] This conflicted with the views of non-Han groups like the Mongols and Tibetans; they considered their fealty to be held by the Qing sovereign, and whose abdication left them independent and without obligations to the new Chinese state.[citation needed]

After the founding of the PRC, the concept ofZhonghua minzu became influenced bySoviet nationalities policy. Officially, the PRC is aunitary state composed of56 ethnic groups, of which the Han are by far the largest. The concept ofZhonghua minzu is seen as an all-encompassing category consisting of people within the borders of the PRC.[citation needed]

This term has continued to be invoked and remains a powerful concept in China into the 21st century. In mainland China, it continues to hold use as the leaders of China need to unify into one political entity a highly diverse set of ethnic and social groups as well as to mobilize the support ofoverseas Chinese in developing China.[citation needed] The term is included in article 22 of the Regulations on United Front Work of theChinese Communist Party: "...promote national unity and progress, and enhance the identification of the masses of all ethnic groups with the great motherland, the Chinese nation (Zhonghua minzu), Chinese culture, the Chinese Communist Party, andsocialism with Chinese characteristics."[34]Zhonghua minzu is also one of theFive Identifications.[35]

InTaiwan, it has been invoked by former PresidentMa Ying-jeou as a unifying concept that includes the people of both Taiwan and mainland China without a possible interpretation that Taiwan is part the People's Republic of China.[36]

Part ofa series on
Nationalism

Implications

[edit]

The adoption of theZhonghua minzu concept may give rise to the reinterpretation of Chinese history. For example, the Qing dynasty was originally sometimes characterized as aconquest dynasty or non-Han regime. Following the adoption of theZhonghua minzu ideology, which regards the Manchus as a member of theZhonghua minzu, dynasties founded by ethnic minorities are no longer stigmatized.[citation needed]

The concept ofZhonghua minzu nevertheless also leads to the reassessment of the role of many traditional hero figures. Heroes such asYue Fei andZheng Chenggong, who were originally often considered to have fought for China against barbarian incursions, have been re-characterized by some asminzu yingxiong ('ethnic heroes') who fought not against barbarians but against other members of theZhonghua minzu—theJurchens andManchus respectively.[37] At the same time, China exemplified heroes such asGenghis Khan, who became a national hero as a member of theZhonghua minzu.[38]

Ambiguity

[edit]

The concept of theZhonghua minzu has sometimes resulted in friction with neighboring countries such asMongolia,North Korea andSouth Korea, who claim regional historical peoples and states. For instance, Mongolia has questioned the concept of Genghis Khan as a "national hero" during theRepublic of China period. Since the collapse of socialism, Mongolia has clearly positioned Genghis Khan as the father of the Mongolian nation.[39] Some Chinese scholars rejections of that position involve tactics such as pointing out that more ethnicMongols live within China than Mongolia and that the modern-day state of Mongolia acquired its independence from the Republic of China which claimed the legal right to inherit all Qing territories, including Mongolia, through theImperial Edict of the Abdication of the Qing Emperor.[40][41][42] There is also controversy between China and the Korean Peninsula regarding the historical status ofGoguryeo.[43]

Resistance to Zhonghua minzu

[edit]

TheXi Jinping administration, sinceXi Jinping's appointment asGeneral Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party in November 2012, has promoted the slogan of the "Great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation".

Reverence for the legendary ancestor of the Chinese people, theYellow Emperor, has intensified, and in some regions such asUyghur andTibet, there are individuals who feel resentment toward being subsumed under the concept of the "Zhonghua minzu"[44].

Furthermore, resistance to Chinese nationalism also exists amongTaiwanese independence advocates and theHong Kong localist camp.[45] In response to this,Hong Kong nationalism emerged, andTaiwanese nationalism, advocated by Taiwanese historianSu Beng, gained traction. The theory thatHongkongers constitute a distinct ethnic group, known as Hong Kong ethnic theory, was also influenced by these ideas[46].

The concept of the Chinese nation has also been discussed in connection withterritorial disputes, based on the notion that “the land inhabited by the Chinese nation should be governed by a single state”[47]. These ideas are referred to asGreater Chinese nationalism [ja], and in Hong Kong, supporters of such ideology are often mocked with the termZhōnghuá jiāo [zh][48]. The term “Greater China” itself originates from the traditional idea that China has historically been aunified civilization.

Liu Zhongjing, apolitical theorist residing in theUnited States, has argued that the concept of the Chinese nation is a political fabrication and has advocated for the theory ofZhu-Xiaism [ja] (諸夏主義).

Chan Ho-tin stated that Peking claims the People’s Republic of China is a nation-state with a unified national identity called “Zhonghua Minzu” or the “Chinese race.”[49][50] This concept, used to serve political and imperial goals, includes diverse groups such as Tibetans, Mongolians, Shanghainese, Taiwanese, Hong Kongers, and the Chinese diaspora worldwide. According to Beijing’s official stance, all these groups are part of the “Zhonghua” race and thus owe loyalty to the central government.[49][50] While this is considered absurd by many scholars, it remains the party line. Chan Ho-tin criticized this nationalism as a cover forChinese imperialism. He pointed to Beijing’s breaches of the Seventeen Point Agreement with Tibet, broken promises upon joining the WTO, and violations of the Sino-British Joint Declaration that have reduced freedoms in Hong Kong.[49][50]

Relations with Japan

[edit]

Tang Chunfeng, a Chinese scholar specializing in Okinawan affairs, has expressed support for theRyukyu independence movement and asserted that theRyukyuan people are descendants of the Chinese nation.[51]

Zhao Dong of thePreparatory Committee for the Ryukyu Special Autonomous Region of China, which claims that Okinawa is Chinese territory, stated that "Ryukyu is part of the Chinese nation's domain".[52]

In August 1948,Kiyuna Tsugumasa, a formerspy for theRepublic of China, declared, “We are part of the Chinese nation and must support the liberation of our Ryukyuan brothers.”[53]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Some writers also translate it as "Chinese people", "Chinese nation", "Chinese ethnicity", and "Chinese race".[1][2][3]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^State and Society in 21st Century China: Crisis, Contention and Legitimation. Psychology Press. 2004. p. 180.ISBN 978-0-415-33204-0.... however, the CCP's nationalist claims are increasingly falling on deaf ears. Popular nationalists like Jin Hui now speak regularly of the "Motherland" (zuguo) and the "Chinese race" (Zhonghua minzu) - without reference to the Party. And they care so deeply
  2. ^Anderlini, Jamil (21 June 2017)."The dark side of China's national renewal".Financial Times. Retrieved9 March 2021.
  3. ^David Tobin (October 2022).Securing China's Northwest Frontier: Identity and Insecurity in Xinjiang. Cambridge University Press. p. 235.ISBN 978-1-108-48840-2.Repeated use of what should now be translated as 'Chinese race, (Zhonghua Minzu 中华民族), alongside omission of ethnic minorities in official narratives ...
  4. ^abLandis, Dan; Albert, Rosita D. (14 February 2012).Handbook of Ethnic Conflict: International Perspectives. Springer. pp. 182–.ISBN 978-1461404477. Retrieved13 October 2016.
  5. ^Zhao, Suisheng (2000). "Chinese Nationalism and Its International Orientations".Political Science Quarterly.115 (1):1–33.doi:10.2307/2658031.JSTOR 2658031.
  6. ^Zhou, Wenjiu; Zhang (2007).关于"中华民族是一个"学术论辩的考察 [On the academic argument that "the Chinese nation is one"].Minzu Yanjiu (in Chinese).3:20–29.Archived from the original on 29 October 2019. Retrieved29 October 2019 – via d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mzyj200703003.
  7. ^abLawrance, Alan (2004).China Since 1919: Revolution and Reform: a Sourcebook. Psychology Press. pp. 252–.ISBN 978-0-415-25141-9. Retrieved13 October 2016.
  8. ^abBloxham, Donald; Moses, A. Dirk (15 April 2010).The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies. Oxford University Press. pp. 150–.ISBN 978-0-19-161361-6. Retrieved13 October 2016.
  9. ^Fitzgerald, John (January 1995). "The Nationaless State: The Search for a Nation in Modern Chinese Nationalism".The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs.33 (33):75–104.doi:10.2307/2950089.ISSN 0156-7365.JSTOR 2950089.S2CID 150609586.
  10. ^Blum, Susan Debra;Jensen, Lionel M. (2002).China Off Center: Mapping the Margins of the Middle Kingdom. University of Hawaiʻi Press. pp. 170–.ISBN 978-0-8248-2577-5. Retrieved13 October 2016.
  11. ^Sun, Yat-sen (1994) [Speech from 1919]."3.5 The Three Principles of the People [San-min chu-i]". In Wei, Julie Lee; Myers, Ramon H.; Gillin, Donald G. (eds.).Prescriptions for saving China: Selected writings of Sun Yat-sen. Translated by Wei, Julie Lee; Zen, E-su; Chao, Linda. Stanford, Calif.:Hoover Institution Press. pp. 223–225.ISBN 0-8179-9281-2.
  12. ^Wai-Chung Ho (2018).Culture, Music Education, and the Chinese Dream in Mainland China. Springer Nature Singapore. p. 38.ISBN 9789811075339.
  13. ^Huiyun Feng (2020).China's Challenges and International Order Transition. University of Michigan Press. p. 151.ISBN 9780472131761.
  14. ^Chagatai is the predecessor of Uyghur
  15. ^Hauer 2007Archived 4 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 117.
  16. ^Dvořák 1895Archived 23 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 80.
  17. ^Wu 1995Archived 23 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 102.
  18. ^abEmpire to nation: historical perspectives on the making of the modern world, by Joseph Esherick, Hasan Kayalı, Eric Van Young, p. 232
  19. ^Zhao, Gang (January 2006)."Reinventing China: Imperial Qing Ideology and the Rise of Modern Chinese National Identity in the Early Twentieth Century"(PDF).Modern China.32 (1):3–30.doi:10.1177/0097700405282349.ISSN 0097-7004.JSTOR 20062627.S2CID 144587815. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 25 March 2014.
  20. ^Dunnell 2004Archived 3 December 2016 at theWayback Machine, pp. 76–77.
  21. ^Dunnell 2004Archived 3 December 2016 at theWayback Machine, p. 77.
  22. ^Dunnell 2004Archived 23 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 83.
  23. ^Elliott 2001Archived 18 May 2016 at theWayback Machine, p. 503.
  24. ^Cassel 2011Archived 30 April 2016 at theWayback Machine, p. 205.
  25. ^Cassel 2012Archived 23 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 205.
  26. ^Cassel 2011Archived 23 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 44.
  27. ^Cassel 2012Archived 23 August 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 44.
  28. ^Perdue 2009Archived 21 July 2020 at theWayback Machine, p. 218.
  29. ^"nationalism;Identification of state and people".Archived from the original on 15 March 2010. Retrieved9 March 2010.
  30. ^French Centre for Research on Contemporary China (CEFC)Archived 21 March 2008 at theWayback Machine. (cf. by Tongmenghui adherent)
  31. ^Margaret Sleeboom (2004).Academic Nations in China and Japan. Taylor & Francis. p. 52.ISBN 9781134376148.
  32. ^Christian P. Sorace (2019).Afterlives of Chinese Communism. ANU Press. p. 17.ISBN 9781760462499.
  33. ^修改党章的说明—— 在上海中国国民党本部会议的演说 [Explanation of the Revision of the Party Constitution - speech at the meeting of the Chinese Kuomintang headquarters in Shanghai].The Museum of Dr. Sun Yat-sen (in Chinese). 4 November 2020. Retrieved10 November 2024.
  34. ^中共中央印发《中国共产党统一战线工作条例》 [Regulations on United Front Work of the Chinese Communist Party].State Council of the People's Republic of China (in Chinese). 5 January 2021.Archived from the original on 12 March 2023. Retrieved13 March 2023.
  35. ^Hayton, Bill (13 October 2020).The Invention of China. Yale University Press. p. 131.ISBN 978-0-300-23482-4.
  36. ^See, e.g. Ma Ying-jeou,President of Republic of China inauguration speechArchived 2 June 2008 at theWayback Machine, 20 May 2008: (Section 2, Paragraph 8)
  37. ^"What makes a national hero?".Archived from the original on 10 June 2008. Retrieved25 May 2008.
  38. ^The Chinese Cult of Chinggis Khan: Genealogical Nationalism and Problems of National and Cultural IntegrityArchived 28 May 2008 at theWayback Machine, City University of New York.
  39. ^"Modern Mongolia: Reclaiming Genghis Khan". Penn Museum. Retrieved24 September 2019.
  40. ^Esherick, Joseph; Kayali, Hasan; Van Young, Eric (2006).Empire to Nation: Historical Perspectives on the Making of the Modern World. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 245.ISBN 978-0-742-57815-9 – via Google Books.
  41. ^Zhai, Zhiyong (2017).憲法何以中國 (in Chinese). City University of HK Press. p. 190.ISBN 978-9-629-37321-4.
  42. ^Gao, Quanxi (2016).政治憲法與未來憲制 (in Chinese). City University of Hong Kong Press. p. 273.ISBN 978-9-629-37291-0 – via Google Books.
  43. ^Shin, Gi-Wook; Gordon, Haley; Kim, Hannah June (8 February 2022)."South Koreans Are Rethinking What China Means to Their Nation". The Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies. Retrieved8 February 2022.
  44. ^Cite error: The named referencehokkaido-np1-0124959 was invoked but never defined (see thehelp page).
  45. ^大中華膠的懺悔
  46. ^倉田, 徹. (2017)."雨傘運動とその後の香港政治―一党支配と分裂する多元的市民社会".アジア研究.63.doi:10.11479/asianstudies.63.1_68.
  47. ^論香港人之身份(戴毛畏) - 熱新聞 YesNews
  48. ^大中華膠的懺悔 立場新聞[dead link]
  49. ^abc陳浩天於香港外國記者會演講全文 獨媒轉載 獨立媒體
  50. ^abc陳浩天FCC演講全文 – 新傳網
  51. ^"中露海軍日本一周の意図:北海道はロシア領、沖縄を中国領に ソ連による終戦後の北方四島侵攻は「米英ソの密約」で行われた | JBpress (ジェイビープレス)".JBpress(日本ビジネスプレス) (in Japanese). Retrieved9 November 2025.
  52. ^【亞視清盤】又有白武士 內地電子商人趙東願注資六千萬
  53. ^齋藤道彦 (2015).蔡璋と琉球革命同志会・1941年~1948年.中央大学経済研究所年報 (Thesis). Vol. 46. 中央大学経済研究所. pp. 551–565.ISSN 0285-9718.NAID 120006639109.

Works cited

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Concepts
Ethnology
Groups by region
Multiethnic society
Ideology and
ethnic conflict
Related
Development
Bytype
Organizations
Related concepts
Sino-Tibetan
Sinitic
Lolo-Burmese
Qiangic
Tibetic
Others
Austroasiatic
Austronesian
Hmong-Mien
Mongolic
Kra–Dai
Tungusic
Turkic
Indo-European
Others
Related
Underlined: the 56 officially recognised ethnic groups ranked by population in their language families according to2020 census
History
Founders
Ideology
Leaders
Party congress
Leadership elections
Significant venues
See also
Notes: Acting leadersitalicised ; By-elections denoted with (b)
Diplomatic posts
Diplomacy
Conflicts
Incidents
Legislation
Organizations
Concepts
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhonghua_minzu&oldid=1338278364"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp