During his youth, Lutosławski studied piano and composition inWarsaw. His early works were influenced byPolish folk music and demonstrated a wide range of rich atmospherictextures. His folk-inspired music includes the Concerto for Orchestra (1954)—which first brought him international renown—andDance Preludes (1955), which he described as a "farewell to folklore". From the late 1950s he began developing new, characteristic composition techniques. He introduced limitedaleatoric elements, while retaining tight control of his music's material, architecture, and performance. He also evolved his practice of buildingharmonies from small groups ofmusical intervals.
DuringWorld War II, after narrowly escaping German capture, Lutosławski made a living playing the piano in Warsaw bars. After the war,Stalinist authorities banned hisFirst Symphony for being "formalist": accessible only to an elite. Rejecting anti-formalism as an unjustified retrograde step, Lutosławski resolutely strove to maintain his artistic integrity, providing artistic support to theSolidarity movement throughout the 1980s. He received numerousawards and honours, including theGrawemeyer Award and aRoyal Philharmonic Society Gold Medal. In 1994, Lutosławski was awarded Poland's highest honour, theOrder of the White Eagle.
Witold Roman Lutosławski was born on 25 January 1913, inWarsaw, Poland.[2] His parents were both born into the Polish landed nobility;[3] they owned estates in the area ofDrozdowo. His father Józef was involved in the PolishNational Democratic Party ("Endecja"), and the Lutosławski family became intimate with its founder,Roman Dmowski (Witold Lutosławski's middle name was Roman). Józef Lutosławski studied inZürich, where in 1904 he met and married a fellow student, Maria Olszewska, who later became Lutosławski's mother. Józef pursued his studies in London, where he acted as correspondent for theNational-Democratic newspaper,Goniec. He continued to be involved in National Democracy politics after returning to Warsaw in 1905, and took over the management of the family estates in 1908. Witold Roman Lutosławski, the youngest of three brothers, was born in Warsaw shortly before the outbreak ofWorld War I.[4][5]
In 1915, with Russia at war with Germany,Prussian forces drove towards Warsaw. The Lutosławskis travelled east to Moscow, where Józef remained politically active, organisingPolish Legions ready for any action that might liberate Poland (which hadbeen divided over a century earlier—Warsaw was part ofTsarist Russia). Dmowski's strategy was for Russia to guarantee security for a new Polish state. In 1917, theFebruary Revolution forced theTsar to abdicate, and theOctober Revolution started a new Soviet government that made peace with Germany. Józef's activities were now in conflict with theBolsheviks, who arrested him and his brother Marian. Thus, although fighting stopped on the Eastern Front in 1917, the Lutosławskis were prevented from returning home. The brothers were interned inButyrskaya prison in central Moscow, where Witold—by then aged five—visited his father. Józef and Marian were executed by a firing squad in September 1918, some days before their scheduled trial.[4][5]
After the war, the family returned tothe newly independent Poland, only to find their estates ruined. After his father's death, other members of the family played an important part in Witold's early life, especially Józef's half-brotherKazimierz Lutosławski, a priest and politician.[6][4][5]
At age six, Lutosławski started two years of piano lessons in Warsaw. After thePolish-Soviet War the family left Warsaw to return to Drozdowo, but after a few years of running the estates with limited success, his mother returned to Warsaw. She worked as a physician, and translated books for children from English.[6] In 1924, Lutosławski entered secondary school (Stefan Batory Gymnasium) while continuing piano lessons. A performance ofKarol Szymanowski's Third Symphony deeply affected him. In 1925, he started violin lessons at the Warsaw Music School.[7] In 1931, he enrolled atWarsaw University to study mathematics, and in 1932 he formally joined the composition classes at the Conservatory. His only composition teacher wasWitold Maliszewski, a renowned Polish composer who had been a pupil ofNikolai Rimsky-Korsakov. Lutosławski was given a strong grounding in musical structures, particularlymovements insonata form. In 1932, he gave up the violin, and in 1933 he discontinued his mathematics studies to concentrate on the piano and composition.[4][5] As a student ofJerzy Lefeld, he gained a diploma for piano performance from the Conservatory in 1936, after presenting a virtuoso program includingSchumann'sToccata andBeethoven'sfourth piano concerto.[8] His diploma for composition was awarded by the same institution in 1937.[9]
Lutosławski (right) greets his old friendAndrzej Panufnik (left) in 1990.
Military service followed; Lutosławski was trained in signalling and radio operating in Zegrze near Warsaw.[10] He completed hisSymphonic Variations in 1939. The work was premiered by the Polish Radio Symphony Orchestra conducted byGrzegorz Fitelberg, with the performance broadcast on radio on 9 March 1939.[11][12] Like most young Polish composers, Lutosławski wanted to continue his education in Paris. His plans for further musical study were dashed in September 1939, whenGermany invaded western Poland andRussia invaded eastern Poland.[13] Lutosławski was mobilised with the radio unit for theKraków Army.[14] He was soon captured by German soldiers,[14] but escaped while being marched to prison camp, walking 250 miles (400 km) back to Warsaw.[15] Lutosławski's brother was captured by Russian soldiers and later died in aSiberianlabour camp.[15][16]
To earn a living, Lutosławski joined "Dana Ensemble", the first Polish revellers, as an arranger-pianist, singing in "Ziemiańska Cafe".[17][18] He then formed a piano duo with friend and fellow composerAndrzej Panufnik, performing together in Warsaw cafés.[19][20] Their repertoire consisted of a wide range of music in their own arrangements, including the first incarnation of Lutosławski's Variations on a Theme by Paganini, a transcription of the24th Caprice for solo violin byNiccolò Paganini.[20] Defiantly, they sometimes played Polish music (the Nazis banned Polish music in Poland—including that ofFrédéric Chopin), and composed Resistance songs.[21] Listening in cafés was the only way in which the Poles of German-occupied Warsaw could hear live music; putting on concerts was impossible since the Germans occupying Poland prohibited any organised gatherings.[22] In caféAria, where they played, Lutosławski met his future wife Maria Danuta Bogusławska, a sister of the writerStanisław Dygat.[23]
Lutosławski left Warsaw in July 1944 with his mother, just a few days before theWarsaw Uprising. During the complete destruction of the city by Germans after the failure of the uprising,[24] most of his music was lost, as were the family's Drozdowo estates.[25] He was able to salvage only a few scores and sketches;[26] of the 200 or so arrangements that Lutosławski and Panufnik had worked on for their piano duo, only Lutosławski's Variations on a Theme by Paganini survived.[20] Lutosławski returned to the ruins of Warsaw after the Polish-Soviet treaty in April 1945.[27]
During the postwar years, Lutosławski worked on hisFirst Symphony—sketches of which he had salvaged from Warsaw—which he had started in 1941.[28] It was first performed in 1948, conducted by Fitelberg.[29] To provide for his family, he also composed music that he termedfunctional, such as theWarsaw Suite (written to accompany a silent film depicting the city's reconstruction),[30] sets ofPolish Carols, and the study pieces for piano,Melodie Ludowe ("Folk Melodies").[27]
In 1945, Lutosławski was elected as secretary and treasurer of the newly constitutedUnion of Polish Composers (ZKP—Związek Kompozytorów Polskich).[31] In 1946, he married Danuta Bogusławska.[30] The marriage was a lasting one, and Danuta'sdrafting skills were of great value to the composer: she became hiscopyist,[30] and solved some of the notational challenges of his later works.[32]
In 1947, theStalinist political climate led to the adoption and imposition by the rulingPolish United Workers' Party of the tenets ofsocialist realism. The political authorities condemned new compositions deemed to be non-conformist. This artistic censorship, which ultimately came fromStalin personally, was to some degree prevalent over the wholeEastern bloc, and was reinforced by the 1948Zhdanov decree.[33] By 1948, the ZKP was taken over by musicians willing to follow the party line on musical matters. Lutosławski resigned from the committee,[34] implacably opposed to the ideas of socialist realism.[35]
Lutoslawski's First Symphony was proscribed as "formalist",[36] and he found himself shunned by the Soviet authorities, a situation that continued throughout the era ofKhrushchev,Brezhnev,Andropov andChernenko.[37] In 1954, the climate of musical oppression drove his friend Andrzej Panufnik todefect to the United Kingdom. Against this background, Lutosławski was content to compose pieces for which there was social need,[38] but in 1954 this earned him—much to the composer's chagrin—the Prime Minister's Prize for a set of children's songs.[39] He commented: "[I]t was for those functional compositions of mine that the authorities decorated me... I realised that I was not writing indifferent little pieces, only to make a living, but was carrying on an artistic creative activity in the eyes of the outside world."[40]
It was his substantial and originalConcerto for Orchestra of 1954 that established Lutosławski as an important composer of art music. The work, commissioned in 1950 by the conductorWitold Rowicki for the newly reconstituted Warsaw Philharmonic Orchestra, earned the composer two state prizes in the following year.[41]
Stalin's death in 1953 allowed a certain relaxation of the cultural totalitarianism in Russia and its satellite states.[42] By 1956,political events had led to a partial thawing of the musical climate, and theWarsaw Autumn Festival of Contemporary Music was founded.[43] Conceived as a biennial festival, it has been held annually ever since 1958 (except underMartial law in 1982 when, in protest, the ZKP refused to organise it).[44] The first performance of hisMusique funèbre (in Polish,Muzyka żałobna, EnglishFunereal Music orMusic of Mourning) took place in 1958. It was written to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the death ofBéla Bartók, but took the composer four years to complete.[45] This work brought international recognition,[46] and the annual ZKP prize and theInternational Rostrum of Composers prize in 1959.[47] Lutosławski'sharmonic andcontrapuntal thinking were developed in this work, and in theFive songs of 1956–57,[48] as he introduced his twelve-note system, he realised the fruits of many years of thought and experiment.[49] Another new feature of his compositional technique became a Lutosławski signature: he introduced randomness into the exactsynchronisation of various parts of the musical ensemble inJeux vénitiens ("Venetian games").[50] These harmonic and temporal techniques became part of every subsequent work, and were integral to his style.[51]
Lutosławski during his visit to Finland, 10 March 1965
In a departure from his usually serious compositions in 1957 to 1963, Lutosławski also composed light music under the pseudonymDerwid. Mostlywaltzes,tangos,foxtrots and slow-foxtrots for voice and piano, these pieces are in the genre of Polishactors' songs. Their place in Lutosławski's output may be seen as less incongruous in light of his own performances of cabaret music during the war, as well as his relationship by marriage to his wife's sister-in-law, the famous Polish cabaret singerKalina Jędrusik.[52]
In 1963, Lutosławski fulfilled a commission for theMusic Biennale Zagreb, hisTrois poèmes d'Henri Michaux for chorus and orchestra. It was the first work he had written for a commission from abroad, and brought him further international acclaim.[53] It earned him a second State Prize for music (Lutosławski was not cynical about the award this time), and he gained an agreement for the international publication of his music withChester Music, then part of the Hansen publishing house.[53] HisString Quartet was first performed inStockholm in 1965,[54] followed the same year by the first performance of his orchestralsong-cycleParoles tissées. This shortened title was suggested by the poet Jean-François Chabrun, who had published the poems asQuatre tapisseries pour la Châtelaine de Vergi.[55] The song cycle is dedicated to the tenorPeter Pears, who first performed it at the 1965Aldeburgh Festival with the composer conducting.[55] (The Festival was founded and organised byBenjamin Britten, with whom the composer formed a lasting friendship.)[56]
Shortly after this, Lutosławski started work on hisSecond Symphony,[57] which had two premieres:Pierre Boulez conducted the second movement,Direct, in 1966, and when the first movement,Hésitant, was finished in 1967, the composer conducted a complete performance inKatowice.[55] The Second Symphony is very different from a conventional classicalsymphony in structure, with Lutosławski using his many compositional innovations to build a large-scale, dramatic work worthy of the name.[58] In 1968, the Symphony earned Lutosławski first prize from theInternational Music Council's International Rostrum of Composers, his third such award,[55] confirming his growing international reputation. In 1967, Lutosławski was awarded theLéonie Sonning Music Prize, Denmark's highest musical honour.[59]
The Second Symphony, andLivre pour orchestre and aCello Concerto which followed, were composed during a particularly traumatic period in Lutosławski's life. His mother died in 1967,[60] and in 1967–70 there was a great deal of unrest in Poland. This sprang first from the suppression of the theatre productionDziady, which sparked a summer of protests; later, in 1968, the use of Polish troops to suppress the liberal reforms inCzechoslovakia'sPrague Spring, and theGdańsk Shipyards strike of 1970—which led to a violent clampdown by the authorities, both caused significant political and social tension in Poland.[61] Lutosławski did not support the Soviet regime, and these events have been postulated as reasons for the increase in antagonistic effects in his work, particularly the Cello Concerto of 1968–70 forRostropovich and theRoyal Philharmonic Society.[62][63] Indeed, Rostropovich's own opposition to the Soviet regime in Russia was just coming to a head (he shortly afterwards declared his support for the dissidentAleksandr Solzhenitsyn).[64] Lutosławski himself did not hold the view that such influences had a direct effect on his music, although he acknowledged that they impinged on his creative world to some degree.[65] In any case, the Cello Concerto was a great success, earning both Lutosławski and Rostropovich accolades. At the work's première with theBournemouth Symphony Orchestra,Arthur Bliss presented Rostropovich with the Royal Philharmonic Society's gold medal.[66]
In 1973, Lutosławski attended a recital given by the baritoneDietrich Fischer-Dieskau with the pianistSviatoslav Richter in Warsaw; he met the singer after the concert and this inspired him to write his extended orchestral songLes Espaces du sommeil ("The spaces of sleep").[67] This work,Preludes and Fugue,Mi-Parti (a French expression that roughly translates as "divided into two equal but different parts"),Novelette, and a short piece for cello in honour ofPaul Sacher's seventieth birthday, occupied Lutosławski throughout the 1970s, while in the background he was working away at a projected Third symphony and aconcertante piece for the oboistHeinz Holliger. These latter pieces were proving difficult to complete,[68] as Lutosławski struggled to introduce greater fluency into his sound world and to reconcile tensions between the harmonic and melodic aspects of his style,[69] and between foreground and background.[70] TheDouble Concerto for oboe, harp and chamber orchestra—commissioned by Sacher—was finally finished in 1980,[71] and theThird Symphony in 1983. In 1977, he received theOrder of the Builders of People's Poland. In 1983, he received theErnst von Siemens Music Prize.[72]
During this period, Poland was undergoing yet more upheaval: in 1980, the influential movementSolidarność was created, led byLech Wałęsa;[73] and in 1981, martial law was declared by GeneralWojciech Jaruzelski.[65] From 1981 to 1989, Lutosławski refused all professional engagements in Poland as a gesture of solidarity with the artists' boycott.[74] He refused to enter the Culture Ministry to meet any of the ministers, and was careful not be photographed in their company.[74] In 1983, as a gesture of support, he sent a recording of the first performance (in Chicago) of the Third Symphony to Gdańsk to be played to strikers in a local church.[74] In 1983, he was awarded the Solidarity prize, of which Lutosławski was reported to be more proud than any other of his honours.[75]
Through the mid-1980s, Lutosławski composed three pieces calledŁańcuch ("Chain"), which refers to the way the music is constructed from contrasting strands which overlap like the links of a chain.[76]Chain 2 was written forAnne-Sophie Mutter (commissioned by Sacher), and for Mutter he also orchestrated his slightly earlierPartita for violin and piano, providing a new linking Interlude,[77] so that when played together the Partita, Interlude, andChain 2 form his longest work.[78]
In 1985, the Third Symphony earned Lutosławski the firstGrawemeyer Prize from theUniversity of Louisville, Kentucky.[79][80] The significance of the prize lay not just in its prestige but in the size of its financial award (then US$150,000). The award is intended to remove recipients' financial concerns for a period to allow them to concentrate on serious composition. In a gesture ofaltruism, Lutosławski announced that he would use the fund to set up a scholarship to enable young Polish composers to study abroad; Lutosławski also directed that his fee from theSan Francisco Symphony Orchestra forChain 3 should go to this scholarship fund.[81]
At this time Lutosławski was writing hisPiano Concerto forKrystian Zimerman, commissioned by theSalzburg Festival.[84] His earliest plans to write a piano concerto dated from 1938; he was himself in his younger days avirtuoso pianist.[85] It was a performance of this work and the Third Symphony at the Warsaw Autumn Festival in 1988 that marked the composer's return to the conductor's podium in Poland, after substantive talks had been arranged between the government and the opposition.[86]
Around 1990 Lutosławski also worked on a fourth symphony and his orchestral song-cycleChantefleurs et Chantefables forsoprano.[87] The latter was first performed at aProm concert in London in 1991,[88] and the Fourth Symphony in 1993 in Los Angeles.[88] In between, and after initial reluctance, Lutosławski took on the presidency of the newly reconstituted "Polish Cultural Council",[89] which was set up after the1989 legislative elections led to the end ofcommunist rule in Poland.[89]
In 1993, Lutosławski continued his busy schedule, travelling to the United States, England, Finland, Canada and Japan,[90] and sketching a violin concerto,[91] but by the first week of 1994 it was clear that cancer had taken hold,[92] and after an operation the composer weakened quickly and died on 7 February, aged 81.[93] He had, a few weeks before, been awarded Poland's highest honour, theOrder of the White Eagle (only the second person to receive this since the collapse of communism in Poland—the first had beenPope John Paul II).[93] He was cremated; his wife Danuta died shortly afterwards.[94]
Lutosławski's works up until and including theDance Preludes (1955) show the influence ofPolish folk music, both harmonically and melodically. Part of his art was in transforming folk music, rather than quoting it exactly. In some cases, such as the Concerto for Orchestra, folk music is unrecognisable as such without careful analysis.[96] As Lutosławski developed the techniques of his mature compositions, he stopped using folk material explicitly, although its influence remained as subtle features until the end. As he said, "[in those days] I could not compose as I wished, so I composed as I was able",[97] and about this change of direction he said, "I was simply not so interested in it [using folk music]". Also, Lutosławski was dissatisfied with composing in a "post-tonal" idiom: while composing the first symphony, he felt that this was for him acul-de-sac.[98] As such,Dance Preludes would prove to be his final composition centered around folk music; he described it as a "farewell to folklore".[1]
InFive Songs (1956–57) andMusique funèbre (1958) Lutosławski introduced his own brand oftwelve-tone music, marking his departure from the explicit use of folk music.[49] His twelve-tone technique allowed him to build harmony and melody from specific intervals (inMusique funèbre,augmented fourths andsemitones). This system also gave him the means to write densechords without resorting totone clusters, and enabled him to build towards these dense chords (which often include all twelve notes of the chromatic scale) at climactic moments.[99] Lutosławski's twelve-note techniques were thus completely different in conception fromArnold Schoenberg'stone-row system,[100][101] althoughMusique funèbre does happen to be based on a tone row.[102] This twelve-note intervallic technique had its genesis in earlier works such as Symphony No. 1, and Variations on a Theme by Paganini.[103]
AlthoughMusique funèbre was internationally acclaimed, his new harmonic techniques led to something of a crisis for Lutosławski, during which he still could not see how to express his musical ideas.[104] Then on 16 March 1960,[105] listening to Polish Radio broadcast on new music, he happened to hearJohn Cage'sConcert for Piano and Orchestra. Although he was not influenced by the sound or the philosophy of the music, Cage's explorations ofindeterminacy set off a train of thought which resulted in Lutosławski finding a way to retain the harmonic structures he wanted while introducing the freedom for which he was searching.[106] HisThree Postludes were hastily rounded off (he had intended to write four) and he moved on to compose works in which he explored these new ideas.[107]
In works fromJeux vénitiens, Lutosławski wrote long passages in which the parts of the ensemble are not to be synchronised exactly. At cues from the conductor, each instrumentalist may be instructed to move straight on to the next section, to finish their current section before moving on, or to stop. In this way, the random elements within compositionally controlled limits defined by the termaleatory are carefully directed by the composer, who controls the architecture and harmonic progression of the piece precisely. Lutosławskinotated the music exactly; there is noimprovisation, no choice of parts is given to any instrumentalist, and there is thus no doubt about how the musical performance is to be realised.[108]
For hisString Quartet, Lutosławski had produced only the four instrumental parts, refusing to bind them in a full score, because he was concerned that this would imply that he wanted notes in vertical alignment to coincide, as is the case with conventionally notated classical ensemble music. The LaSalle Quartet, however, specifically requested a score from which to prepare for the first performance.[109] Bodman Rae relates that Danuta Lutosławska solved this problem by cutting up the parts and sticking them together in boxes (which Lutosławski calledmobiles), with instructions on how to signal in performance when all of the players should proceed to the next mobile.[54] In his orchestral music, these problems of notation were not so difficult, because the instructions on how and when to proceed are given by the conductor. Lutosławski's called this technique of his mature period "limited aleatorism".[110]
Example 1, numbers 7 to 9 from the score of the Second Symphony (1966–67), illustrates Lutosławski's harmonic and aleatory procedures from his mature style
Both Lutosławski's harmonic and aleatory processes are illustrated byexample 1, an excerpt fromHésitant, the first movement of the Symphony No. 2. At number 7, the conductor gives a cue to the flutes, celesta and percussionist, who then play their parts in their own time, without any attempt to synchronise with the other instrumentalists. The harmony of this section is based on a 12-note chord built frommajor seconds andperfect fourths. After all the instrumentalists have finished their parts, a two-second general pause is indicated ("P.G. 2" at top right of the example). The conductor then gives a cue at number 8 (and indicates the tempo of the following section) for two oboes and thecor anglais. They each play their part, again with no attempt to synchronise with the other players. The harmony of this part is based on the hexachord F♯–G–A♭–C–D♭–D, arranged in such a way that the harmony of the section never includes any sixths or thirds. When the conductor gives another cue at number 9, the players each continue until they reach therepeat sign, and then stop: they are unlikely to end the section at the same time. This "refrain" (from numbers 8 to 9) recurs throughout the movement, slightly altered each time, but always played by double-reed instruments which do not play elsewhere in the movement: Lutosławski thus also carefully controls the orchestral palette.[111]
The combination of Lutosławski's aleatory techniques and his harmonic discoveries allowed him to build up complexmusical textures. According to Bodman Rae, in his later works Lutosławski evolved a more mobile, simpler, harmonic style, in which less of the music is played with anad libitum coordination.[112][113] This development first appeared in the briefEpitaph for oboe and piano,[114] around the time Lutosławski was struggling to find the technical means to complete his Third Symphony. In chamber works for just two instrumentalists the scope for aleatory counterpoint and dense harmonies is significantly less than for orchestra.[115]
Lutosławski's formidable technical developments grew out of his creative imperative; that he left a lasting body of major compositions is a testament to his resolution of purpose in the face of the anti-formalist authorities under which he formulated his methods.[116][117]
In the 21st century, Lutosławski is generally considered the most important Polish composer since Szymanowski, and perhaps the most outstanding since Chopin. This evaluation was not apparent after World WarII, when Panufnik was more highly regarded in Poland. The success of Lutosławski'sConcerto for Orchestra and Panufnik's 1954 defection to England brought Lutosławski to the forefront ofmodern Polish classical music. Initially, he was coupled with his younger contemporaryKrzysztof Penderecki, due to their music's shared stylistic and technical characteristics. When Penderecki's reputation declined in the 1970s, Lutosławski emerged as the major Polish composer of his time and among the most significant 20th-century European composers.[1][118] His four symphonies, the Variations on a Theme by Paganini (1941), theConcerto for Orchestra (1954), and acello concerto (1970) are his best known works.[119]
^Stucky 1981, pp. 36–37;Stucky 1981, p. 63 quotes Lutosławski speaking in 1957, "[I]t is difficult to conceive of a more absurd hypothesis than the idea that the achievements of the past several decades should be abandoned and that one should return to the musical language of the nineteenth century... The period of which I speak may not have lasted long... but all the same it was long enough to do our music immense harm."
^Stucky 1981, pp. 88–89. "In 1967 he received the Gottfried von Herder Prize from the University of Vienna, and in August of that year he was given the Leonie Sonning Prize in Copenhagen 'in recognition and admiration of his mastery as a composer, which is a source of inspiration to the musical life of our age'. The award was presented at an all- Lutoslawski concert as part of the Royal Danish Festival of Music and Ballet celebrating the 800th anniversary of Copenhagen's founding."
^Lutosławski & Varga 1976, "Lutosławski's notebook", also quoted and discussed inJacobson (1996), p. 100. "[...] I have a strong desire to communicate something, through my music, to the people. I am not working to get many 'fans' for myself; I do not want to convince, I want to find. I would like to find people who in the depths of their souls feel the same way as I do. That can only be achieved through the greatest artistic sincerity in every detail of music, from the minutest technical aspects to the most secret depths. I know that this standpoint deprives me of many potential listeners, but those who remain mean an immeasurable treasure for me. [...] I regard creative activity as a kind of soul-fishing, and the 'catch' is the best medicine for loneliness, that most human of sufferings."
^Stucky 1981, p. 49: "Folk tunes are never simply quoted: they are radically transformed, manipulated, made to serve the composer's artistic vision. This approach makes possible a style which is at once so demonstrably 'national' as to be politically unassailable, yet modern enough and personal enough to burst the bounds ofsocrealizm"; and p. 53: "Przedzierzgnę się siwą golębicą is distorted beyond audible recognition ... it is thoroughly dismembered.".
^Stucky 1981, p. 120 quotes Lutosławski, "The different parts can play very complicated rhythms [...] and yet play only the notes of that [twelve-note] chord [...] It may occur that the chord never actually sounds in its entirety—it is supplemented by our memory and imagination."
^Stucky 1981, p. 71, also discussion of Symphony No. 1 pp. 24–25 and symmetrical chords in the pitch organisation ofOverture for Strings pp. 37–39
^Stucky 1981, p. 79: "Solutions to some rhythmic and formal questions still eluded him."
^Witold Lutosławski – Guide to Warsaw: Zwycięzców 39. NIFC 2013
^Lutosławski & Varga 1976, p. 12, says, with reference to this event, "Composers often do not hear the music that is being played; it only serves as an impulse for something quite different—for the creation of music that only lives in their imagination"; see alsoNordwall (1968), p. 20 andStucky (1981), p. 84.
^Stucky 1981, p. 110 quotes Lutosławski: "I do not presuppose any improvised parts, even the shortest, in my works. I am an adherent of a clear-cut division between the role of the composer and that of the performer, and I do not wish even partially to relinquish the authorship of the music I have written."
^Stucky 1981, p. 106: "Lutosławski's life has given ample evidence of the strength of character and sureness of artistic purpose necessary to regard with equanimity both the blandishments of his 'fans' and the disparagements of his detractors."
^Bodman Rae 1999, p. 262: "Above all, he is admired for the musical and moral integrity of his long search, and often difficult struggle, for the personal language and consummate technique that served his individual voice."
Lutosławski, Witold; Varga, Bálint András (1976).Lutosławski Profile: Witold Lutosławski in Conversation with Bálint András Varga. London: Chester Music/Edition Wilhelm Hansen London Ltd.
Nordwall, Ove, ed. (1968).Lutosławski. Stockholm: Edition Wilhelm Hansen.