Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

2006 Wisconsin Referendum 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromWisconsin Referendum 1)

Referendum 1
Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state.
Results
Choice
Votes%
Yes1,264,31059.43%
No862,92440.57%
Valid votes2,127,23497.44%
Invalid or blank votes55,9212.56%
Total votes2,183,155100.00%
Registered voters/turnout4,256,72149.97%

County results
Precinct results

Yes

  90–100%
  80–90%
  70–80%
  60–70%
  50–60%

No

  90–100%
  80–90%
  70–80%
  60–70%
  50–60%

Other

  Tie
  No data

Sources:[1][2][3]
Elections in Wisconsin
Presidential elections
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2016
2020
2024
Republican
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate elections
Class 1
Class 3
U.S. House of Representatives elections
General elections
Gubernatorial elections
Lieutenant Gubernatorial elections
Secretary of State elections
Attorney General elections
Treasurer elections
Superintendent elections
State Senate elections
State Assembly elections
Supreme Court elections
County Executive elections

Wisconsin Referendum 1 of 2006 was areferendum on anamendment to theWisconsin Constitution that would invalidatesame-sex marriages or any substantially similar legal status.[4] The referendum was approved by 59% of voters during the general elections in November 2006.[3] All counties in the state voted for the amendment exceptDane County (home of the state capital,Madison, and the University of Wisconsin), which opposed it. The constitutional amendment created by Referendum 1 has been effectively nullified since June 26, 2015, when theUnited States Supreme Court ruled inObergefell v. Hodges that state-level bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional.[5]

Amendment

[edit]

The text of the adopted amendment, which became Article XIII, Section 13 of the state constitution, reads:

Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized in this state.[6]

As required by the constitution, the amendment was approved by both houses of the legislature, in two consecutive sessions. The legislative history of the amendment is as follows:

  • March 5, 2004: Approved byWisconsin State Assembly by a vote of 68–27.
  • March 12, 2004: Approved byWisconsin State Senate by a vote of 20-13[7]
  • December 6, 2005: Approved by the State Senate a second time, by a vote of 19–14.[8]
  • February 28, 2006: Approved by the State Assembly a second time.
  • November 7, 2006: Approved by referendum, by a margin of 59.4%-40.6%.[9]
CountyYesNoTotal votes
#%#%#
Adams5,14265.2%2,74134.8%7,883
Ashland3,56659.9%2,39240.1%5,958
Barron10,95868.8%4,96231.2%15,920
Bayfield4,13257.9%3,01042.1%7,142
Brown55,78060.6%36,30539.4%92,085
Buffalo3,42864.1%1,92135.9%5,349
Burnett4,41872.4%1,68627.6%6,104
Calumet13,33869.0%5,98631.0%19,324
Chippewa13,99365.4%7,40834.6%21,401
Clark7,73769.2%3,43630.8%11,173
Columbia13,02359.5%8,86640.5%21,889
Crawford3,98062.1%2,42737.9%6,407
Dane70,37733.1%142,49166.9%212,868
Dodge22,55273.4%8,15426.6%30,706
Door8,41259.2%5,79040.8%14,202
Douglas9,31659.9%6,24140.1%15,557
Dunn8,52058.9%5,93941.1%14,459
Eau Claire19,59551.7%18,29748.3%37,892
Florence1,51575.9%48124.1%1,996
Fond du Lac25,74568.7%11,73131.3%37,476
Forest2,40767.1%1,18032.9%3,587
Grant10,54662.5%6,32137.5%16,867
Green7,07454.1%6,01145.9%13,085
Green Lake5,85074.0%2,05126.0%7,901
Iowa4,55350.7%4,42449.3%8,977
Iron1,74365.1%93534.9%2,678
Jackson4,41863.8%2,50436.2%6,922
Jefferson19,91865.1%10,68734.9%30,605
Juneau5,71768.5%2,62531.5%8,342
Kenosha29,67659.2%20,49040.8%50,166
Kewaunee6,45072.9%2,39927.1%8,849
La Crosse21,32750.2%21,17549.8%42,502
Lafayette3,62462.8%2,14937.2%5,773
Langlade5,85668.3%2,72431.7%8,580
Lincoln7,12966.1%3,66133.9%10,790
Manitowoc22,44270.1%9,57229.9%32,014
Marathon31,67565.0%17,05435.0%48,729
Marinette12,19272.8%4,55427.2%16,746
Marquette4,15267.5%2,00332.5%6,155
Menominee50753.1%44846.9%955
Milwaukee172,54855.0%141,45345.0%314,001
Monroe8,87166.2%4,52533.8%13,396
Oconto10,22271.1%4,16528.9%14,387
Oneida9,35659.1%6,47840.9%15,834
Outagamie42,84962.6%25,63137.4%68,480
Ozaukee25,91463.5%14,91636.5%40,830
Pepin2,10670.3%88929.7%2,995
Pierce8,35059.5%5,67340.5%14,023
Polk10,61969.2%4,73330.8%15,352
Portage15,40953.7%13,28546.3%28,694
Price3,94463.6%2,25936.4%6,203
Racine43,86963.8%24,86836.2%68,737
Richland3,93961.6%2,45438.4%6,393
Rock30,22055.6%24,08744.4%54,307
Rusk3,84866.8%1,91633.2%5,764
St. Croix16,66863.1%9,74936.9%26,417
Sauk12,39457.1%9,31042.9%21,704
Sawyer4,24567.1%2,08232.9%6,327
Shawano11,33372.6%4,27927.4%15,612
Sheboygan32,90870.3%13,89529.7%46,803
Taylor4,74166.3%2,41433.7%7,155
Trempealeau5,99663.4%3,46636.6%9,462
Vernon6,25361.6%3,90138.4%10,154
Vilas6,38661.8%3,95338.2%10,339
Walworth20,50161.8%12,65238.2%33,153
Washburn4,46568.0%2,09732.0%6,562
Washington38,75973.7%13,80426.3%52,563
Waukesha118,73668.3%55,16531.7%173,901
Waupaca13,28169.6%5,81030.4%19,091
Waushara6,16868.5%2,83331.5%9,001
Winnebago37,18857.7%27,22842.3%64,416
Wood19,44166.7%9,72333.3%29,164
Totals1,264,31059.4%862,92440.6%2,127,234
Source:Wisconsin Blue Book at theWayback Machine (archived April 3, 2023)

Effects

[edit]

The amendment, which took effect on November 7, 2006, constitutionally banned same-sex marriages, which were never recognized by the state and was statutorily banned since 1979, and civil unions or civil union equivalents, which were never recognized by the state. Wisconsin became the 21st US state to ban same-sex marriage in its constitution and 14th US state to ban civil unions or civil union equivalents in its constitution. This preempted the state judiciary from requiring the state to legally recognize same-sex marriages or civil unions or civil union equivalents and preempted theWisconsin Legislature from enacting a statute legalizing same-sex marriages or civil unions or civil union equivalents.Domestic partnerships in Wisconsin, legal statewide for state employees only and 1 county and 3 municipalities at the time, were unaffected by the amendment. In 2009, Wisconsin would enact statewide domestic partnerships for everyone, which would later be repealed in 2018.

Legal challenge

[edit]

In April 2009 theWisconsin Supreme Court was asked inMcConkey v. Van Hollen to rule on whether the 2006 Referendum 1 was constitutional. William McConkey, a political science instructor, claimed that the measure violated the state's constitution because it proposed more than one question in a single ballot proposal, which is impermissible under Wisconsin law.[10][11][12] On June 30, 2010, the Court ruled that the amendment referendum question was permissible and thus the amendment had been properly passed.[13][14] In 2014, the ACLU filed a lawsuit, Wolf v Walker, to challenge the amendment and a federal judge agreed.[15] On June 6, 2014, theUnited States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin overturned all bans on same-sex marriage in the state.[16] On October 6, 2014, same sex marriage was legalized in Wisconsin.

Pre-decision opinion polls

[edit]
Date of opinion pollConducted bySample sizeIn favorAgainstUndecidedMarginMargin of ErrorSource
October 2006St. Norbert College?51%44%?7% pro?[17]
September 2006Diversified Research forwispolitics.com?53%39%?14% pro?[18]

References

[edit]
  1. ^2006-11-07_FallElection_Referendum_CountyReturns
  2. ^General Election Voter Registration and Absentee Statistics 1984-2022.xlsx
  3. ^abCNN.com Election 2006 - Ballot Measures Accessed 14 December 2006.
  4. ^"Timeline for freedom to marry in Wisconsin".ACLU. October 9, 2014. Archived fromthe original on April 26, 2021. RetrievedJune 14, 2025.
  5. ^"U.S. 21st country to allow same-sex marriage nationwide".CNN. June 26, 2015.
  6. ^"DOMAwatch.org - WisconsinArchived 2005-03-10 at theWayback Machine" Alliance Defense Fund. 2006. Accessed 06 January 2007.
  7. ^Assembly Joint Resolution 66,Journal of the Wisconsin Senate, March 11, 2004, p. 717. The final vote was taken shortly after midnight on March 12.
  8. ^Senate Joint Resolution 53,Journal of the Wisconsin Senate, Dec. 6, 2005, p. 488.
  9. ^Canvass Summary, Wisconsin State Elections Board, Fall General Election, Nov. 7, 2006.
  10. ^Wisconsin amendment supreme court
  11. ^Christopher Magnum,Wis. "Supreme Court Hears Gay Marriage Case", Advocate.com, Nov. 3, 2009.
  12. ^Patrick Marley,"State Supreme Court hears arguments on gay marriage amendment",The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Nov. 3, 2009.
  13. ^"Wisconsin Supreme Court upholds gay marriage ban".6abc.WPVI-TV. June 30, 2010. RetrievedOctober 1, 2023.
  14. ^Foley, Ryan J. (June 30, 2010)."Wisconsin Supreme Court unanimously upholds gay marriage ban".Madison.com.Wisconsin State Journal.AP. Archived fromthe original on July 13, 2022. RetrievedOctober 1, 2023.
  15. ^Redman, Henry (May 23, 2022)."Same-sex marriage partially protected in Wisconsin in a post-Roe future".Wisconsin Examiner. Archived fromthe original on May 23, 2022. RetrievedJune 14, 2025.
  16. ^"Wisconsin's same-sex marriage ban struck down". RetrievedJune 6, 2014.
  17. ^Ballot Measure Update
  18. ^2006 Ballot Measures: A National Scorecard

External links

[edit]
U.S. same-sex unions ballot measures
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
1:De facto ban, granted Legislature authority to ban same-sex marriage. Reversed in 2013 by theHawaii Marriage Equality Act.
General unions
By state
Marriage
By territory
(laws)
State
(laws)
Tribal nations
Circuit Courts
Other regions
Civil unions and
domestic partnerships
By state
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2006_Wisconsin_Referendum_1&oldid=1318357659"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp