| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of theWP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting theweb tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions atthis Google form where you can leave your response.Walkerma (talk)04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This website has come up in a few deletion discussions in the past and I thought it was already discussed but cannot find anything here. Checking on the reliability of Youlin Magazine. Theirabout page has no mention of editorial guidelines. TheirFAQ page says they accept guest posts and that contributors are reviewed by the editorial board but no information about what the "editorial board" is. Gmail address is the main point of contact. Wondering about it being used to verify non controversial information and/or use for notability purposes.CNMall41 (talk)01:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If anyone is interested, there isDraft:Lori (film) which needs notability determination and unfortunately I cannot locate any reliable reviews. The film is from 1966 so sources may be hard to find or non-English.CNMall41 (talk)05:02, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]