| This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Conservatism and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives (index):1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13Auto-archiving period:2 months |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Welcome to theDiscussion page for WikiProject Conservatism. Here you can find discussions, notices, and requests for articles that deal with conservatism. If you would like to discuss, place a notice about, or if you have a request about, an article within the scope of this project, please include it here. Note that posting here in order to try torecruit editors with a particular political point of view is contrary to the intent of this project. Make sure to keep up-to-date on happenings at the projectWatch
I noticed Michael Anton’s page claims he’s the director of policy planning but it also says he left, and the director of policy planning page lists a different guy, but the different guys page doesn’t mention it.
could someone clean this up
thank youGopackgo009 (talk)04:04, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan#Requested move 4 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.WhatADrag07 (talk)02:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Brett Kavanaugh assassination plot#Requested move 5 October 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.TarnishedPathtalk10:54, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have nominatedHonoré de Balzac for afeatured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets thefeatured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process arehere.Z1720 (talk)03:51, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed atWikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratnagiri Hindu Sabha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.—EarthDude (Talk)12:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Félix Houphouët-Boigny has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)16:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Douglas Bruce has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)01:36, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is a discussion over onTalk:Donald Trump regarding whether said page should be listed under the following WikiProjects:Discrimination,Freedom of Speech, andLaw. SinceDonald Trump is within the scope of this project, please feel free to share your thoughts on the matterEmiya1980 (talk)22:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Interested members of this WikiProject are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics#Propose infobox political movement regarding a potential political movement infobox. —EarthDude (Talk)20:20, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
QAnon has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)17:42, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]