Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This WikiProjectwas featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 27 June 2011 |
Archives |
| Index1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 51,52,53,54,55,56 |
This page has archives. Sections older than20 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 10. |
 | WikiProject Comics was featured ina WikiProject Report in theSignpost on 27 June 2011. |
| WikiProject Comics |
|---|
 |
| Information |
Departments |
| Comics Portal |
I've started a discussion in the talk page of theModern Age of Comic Books article; the talk page ishere. I believe that the state of the article is bad, overall. The main issue is that the article seems to be an example of Wikipedia imposing periodization on the history of American comics, rather than going by the definition(s) given by high-quality and reliable sources. I believe that mosst of the article needs to be deleted, and that high-quality, reliable sources need to be found; see how exactly they separate the ages of comics after the Bronze Age - it's possible that there's actually two or more ages, rather than just "Modern Age" - and make necessary adjustments based on that. This could include reorganizing the Modern Age as actually starting in the 21st century, and potentially creating a new article for the 1990s; whether that era is called the Chrome, Copper, or Dark Age.PanagiotisZois (talk)12:09, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 7 § Romulus Augustus (comics), which is within the scope of this WikiProject.Red Shogun412 (talk •contribs)21:56, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is a noticeboard discussion on thereliability ofComic Book Resources (CBR). If you are interested, please participate atWP:RSN § Reliabilty of Comic Book Resources (CBR). — Newslinger talk18:18, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As this is a movie it falls under relevance of this project for any interested parties.Darkwarriorblake (talk)17:16, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion atTalk:Peanuts § GA/FA?, which is within the scope of this WikiProject.sjones23 (talk -contributions)21:02, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Beguiling has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to thereassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.Z1720 (talk)00:47, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to join the discussion atWikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 November 5 § Redirect comics templates.PK2 (talk;contributions)00:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Krypto the Superdog#Requested move 13 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.—Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss ·contribs)23:30, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Flash (Jay Garrick)#Requested move 17 November 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.Red Shogun412 (talk •contribs)02:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
