This is thetalk page for discussingWikiProject Artificial Intelligence and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text.Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome!Learn to edit;get help. Assume good faith Be polite andavoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seekdispute resolution if needed Shortcuts WT:WPMLWT:WPML WT:WPAIWT:WPAI

Archives (index):1Auto-archiving period:3 months

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Artificial Intelligence This page is within the scope ofWikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofArtificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than90 days may be auto-archived byClueBot III if there are more than 5.

Hi all — I'm currently improving two related draft articles:

• Draft:Conversational AI
• Draft:Voice-First AI

They aim to expand on concepts that currently receive limited or fragmented coverage acrossChatbot,Conversational user interface, and related articles.

The drafts are being built with stronger academic sourcing and a focus on distinguishing conversational and voice-first systems in public infrastructure (like transit kiosks and emergency help points) from more typical screen-based chatbots.

I'd really value any feedback from this project’s members — especially about:

• Scope: Are these appropriate subtopics?
• Merge/split: Should Voice-First be its own article or part of Conversational AI?
• Sources: Any high-quality references we should include?

Thanks for any input or collaboration you can offer!

—ArturoFalckArturoFalck (talk)16:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Cyril Voyant, Director of Research at the O.I.E. laboratory, Mines Paris‑PSL, based in Sophia Antipolis. I am seeking the assistance of a neutral volunteer editor (with no personal or professional connection to me) who can review or publish a draft about me, in accordance with community standards.

My academic credentials are publicly verifiable:

HAL profile (116 indexed publications, participation in ANR/EU projects like SAPHIR, Fine4cast, TILOS):https://cv.hal.science/cyril-voyant Google Scholar profile (over 130 peer-reviewed articles, approximately 6,500 citations):https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aUlP6agAAAAJ&hl=en ResearchGate profile (149 publications, around 6,157 citations):https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cyril-Voyant.My research areas include:

Solar irradiance forecasting applying hybrid AI/statistical models, development of novel metrics such as the stochastic coefficient of variation (sCV) and Forecastability Index.

ClearSky‑Free forecasting using Extreme Learning Machines trained directly on raw irradiance data.

Transfer learning and clustering techniques to deploy models in regions lacking local data.

Complex-valued time series modeling to capture amplitude and volatility for probabilistic forecasting.

Medical dosimetry and radiotherapy planning, notably the open‑source software LQL‑Equiv used in over 20 countries.

Projects with national and European funding: SAPHIR, Fine4cast, TILOS. All the information and reference are availaible athttps://www.cyrilvoyant.com/ . A lot reference are available in scopus, publon, mdpi interfaces.

This initiative is strictly non-commercial, primarily aimed at improving access to my work and facilitating future scientific collaborations.

I would be grateful to any volunteer editor, impartial and independent, who can assist in ensuring the text meets Wikipedia guidelines. I can provide access to the draft via EverybodyWiki (Cyril_voyant) or cyrilvoyant.com if needed.

Thank you in advance to anyone willing to contribute to the rigorous and useful dissemination of this scientific work.

Best regards,

Cyril VoyantCyril voyant (talk)20:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This WikiProject appears to beinactive, rather than semi-active: the main page has not received substantial edits in 3 years and the to-do list hasn't been updated since the start of the project. There arefew participants listed, and even fewer who are still making edits and theassessment page is still just the template. This talk page is mostly the RMCD bot notifying about requested moves.

Having a strong WikiProject for AI seems important, and I think there are plenty of strong editors out there who would be motivated to contribute, but it seems the current state of affairs - a project that never really got off the ground - is probably holding back the quality of AI-related articles overall.

I'm not particularly familiar with the mechanisms behind WikiProject management - I'd be grateful if more experienced editors weighed in - but as I understand it, there are a fewoptions:

• A concerted effort could be made torevive the project. This would probably require a small team of motivated editors cleaning up the project, building the infrastructure of the project, and trying to get some momentum going. However, the project was never particularly alive - this would be similar to starting afresh, but with more stuff to clear out of the way beforehand.
• The project could be marked asdefunct, keeping the pages but redirecting interested editors to other projects.
• The project could be nominated fordeletion. This is a suggested approach for WikiProjects that never got off the ground from theWikiProject guide.

The main reasons against marking as defunct or nominating for deletion are that there are~1200 pages in the WPAI category, and a talk history here, and it might be best to retain this for future reference.

Again, I'd be grateful if experienced editors or those involved in other WikiProjects could contribute their thoughts.Nmzzzd (talk)10:00, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to help to revive this project, but like you I also don't know the ins and outs of WikiProject management. But since there doesn't seem to be much activity here I propose that we should beWP:BOLD and try to improve/revive it as best we can.WP:IAR is policy for this very reason.TurboSuperA+_(talk)06:02, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be prudent to separate this project into Task forces like other projects have. Task forces for:

• hunting down LLM-generated articles and content, hallucinated sources and information
• article creation
• fringe futurism, as there is a lot of mumbo-jumbo surrounding this topic area

This might make it easier to manage the project.

Today in the next few days I'll work on refreshing the front page of the project. I'll remove dead links, add new tasks, add links, etc. I'll look into the big, active projects and use them as a guide.

@Nmzzzd: In case they don't receive a notification.TurboSuperA+_(talk)06:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arequested move discussion has been initiated forAmii (research institute) to be moved toAlberta Machine Intelligence Institute. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussionhere. —RMCD bot02:37, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude{{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set upArticle alerts for this WikiProject.

There is a requested move discussion atTalk:Gemini (chatbot)#Requested move 17 September 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.veko. (user |talk |contribs) he/him16:56, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article2045 in artificial intelligence has beenproposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may bedeleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the{{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in youredit summary or onthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing{{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but otherdeletion processes exist. In particular, thespeedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, andarticles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion.Bearian (talk)03:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I’ve recently submitted a draft that outlines practical ethical concerns and regulatory standards related to AI systems, such as ISO/IEC 42001 and the EU AI Act. I would appreciate it if someone from this WikiProject could take a look or consider reviewing it:

→Draft:Applied AI Ethics in Practice

Thanks in advance!--Veraium (talk)09:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• NA-Class Artificial Intelligence pages
• NA-importance Artificial Intelligence pages
• WikiProject Artificial Intelligence articles