Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not Whac-A-Mole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"WP:WHAC" redirects here. You may be looking forWikipedia:Whacking with a wet trout (WP:WHACK).
Essay on editing Wikipedia
This is anessay.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one ofWikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not beenthoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
iconThis page in a nutshell: Don't rush into a discussion pointing at lots of policies without expanding on why you're doing so.
*WP:GNG!* *WP:RS!* *WP:N!* *WP:NPOV!* *WP:SFoD!* New high score!
It is notthis, either.

Wikipedia is not a game ofWhac-A-Mole. You don'tscore points for seeing how manyarticles facing deletion that pop up daily you can mark down in as quick a time as possible.

One of the biggest stumbling blocks newcomers can face on Wikipedia is having to deal with an article that issitting inArticles for Deletion and staring at the onslaught of "Delete perWP:RSDelete perWP:ORDelete perWP:GNG", often quickly following the article's nomination. In particular, they may feel that you're tryingto pull rank by deleting their work.

Stop and think for a second. Does the articlereally have noreliable sources, or couldn't you just be botheredto find any? While online citations are the easiest references to uncover, citations can also take the shape ofbooks,journals andnewspapers. Because they may take more time and effort to find, it can be easy to assume that nobody'shonestly going to look for them, you've done your due diligence, sodelete already! Wham! That's another one out of the way. That'll keep that pesky lot at theArticle Rescue Squad at bay for a bit!

If you're confident an article will not satisfy thegeneral notability guidelines,take time out to explain why not. Maybe the newcomer will understand. Maybe somebody else will suggest sources you haven't tried and reverse the consensus. Please do not do anything that you think is not appropriate.

See also

[edit]
Philosophy
Article construction
Writing article content
Removing or
deleting content
The basics
Philosophy
Dos
Don'ts
WikiRelations
About essays
Policies and guidelines
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_Whac-A-Mole&oldid=1300146848"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp