On Wednesday, the English Wikipedia'sArbitration Committee took some sorely needed action on the long-standing subject offringe theories andWP:PSEUDOSCIENCE, issues where tense disagreements andPOV-pushing have been causing trouble for decades.
Drafting arbitratorHubert Glockenspiel, in an interview with theSignpost, said that the Committee was introducing a set of brand-new fringe opinions, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscientific claims, which will be available for free to anyone interested in arguing on Wikipedia.
| “ | The Committee has taken under advisement feedback from a variety of administrators, trolls, and tendentious editors on both sides of the aisle. It's our hope that these new fringe theories will provide some much-needed respite from arguing about the exact same trivial crap every day for the last fifteen years: now we can argue about slightly different trivial crap. | ” |
| — User:Hubert Glockenspiel | ||
The new topics span a broad range of subjects, academic disciplines and national concerns. "We tried to get a little bit of everything", said Glockenspiel. "Because, after all, Wikipedia was meant to be the sum ofall human arguments about politics. And we're committed to belonging, inclusion, and equity; we need to amplify diverse voices."
A full list (along with suggested arguments for and against each theory) is available atWP:NEWFRINGE, but here is a summary of each one:
While many of the new fringe theories have already been associated with one of the two American political parties, others remain undecided. The Hellenic Oroville theory, in particular, is currently the subject of ardent debate as to what political affiliation its supporters have: some have said that it's an obvious left-wing dogwhistle and critique of American imperialism, whereas some argue that it's an obvious right-wing dogwhistle and fantasy of Macedonian imperialism. There is also a secondary, less-important argument about whether it is correct or not.
One thing's for certain, though: we will have a bunch ofAN/I threads about it.
Long-time tendentious editor (and WMF-banned troll)Snowpisser said, through aspokesman sockpuppet, that he welcomed the challenge of the new theories. "I can't wait to start a big clusterfuck over these. Nobody even knows what side they're supposed to be on yet! I will probably be able to catch a few dozen people off guard, and get them to freak out and get themselves banned."
Meanwhile, controversial administratorDarkAngelBlademaster666 said in a talk page comment that she was looking forward to figuring out what the right opinion was to have on them, and then immediatelyINVOLVED-blocking everyone who she disagreed with. "It's perfect, because none of my existing topic bans apply to this stuff yet. By the time they're expanded to cover these, I will have already gotten to fire off like thirty indefs".
Just wanted to say this made me see how closeHell is to Lake Superior.igordebraga!=16:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]