We live in a harsh, uncertain world. There's anescalating war in Syria that seems to be drawing in the entire northern hemisphere, a resultingEuropean migrant crisis, a slow rise to the boil of the unendingIsraeli–Palestinian conflict, andever more school shootings in the US. But people aren't turning to Wikipedia to comprehend these things; they're turning to Wikipedia to, well, keep up with the Kardashians, follow their latest shows, and track the latest movies. Is the world hiding from itself? Or is Wikipedia not seen as a valid source for such information? Difficult questions. But then, those are in abundance these days.
For the full top-25 list, seeWP:TOP25. Seethis section for an explanation of any exclusions. For a list of the most edited articles of the week, seehere.
As prepared bySerendipodous, for the week of October 11 to 17, the 25 most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of themost viewed pages, were:
| Rank | Article | Class | Views | Image | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamar Odom | 2,067,704 | At this point in their evolution, theKardashian clan have coalesced into their own self-sustaining media ecology, independent of outside events, common sense, and perhaps even thermodynamics. The unconscious appearance of Odom, the former basketball star and divorced husband ofKhloe Kardashian, at a Nevada brothel was not only enough to have him top the list, but to garner almost as many views as the next three topics combined—suggesting that a sizable portion of humanity is prepared to follow them onto their planet. | ||
| 2 | UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying | 746,591 | The English-speaking world has been well-served in qualifiers this year. This week's near-double jump in numbers was likely due to bothNorthern Ireland andWales earning a berth at next year's finals in France. | ||
| 3 | Bernie Sanders | 728,853 | The juniorSenator fromVermont, longest-servingIndependent in US history, and self-describedDemocratic socialist has been for the left of American politics what Donald Trump has been for the right—the voice of angry disaffection. This week, he reappeared on this list after polls claimed he'd won this week's Democratic debate. While no one seriously expects him to win the Democratic nomination, he has provided a much-needed prod for Hillary, who has at times acted as if she was being ordained, rather than elected. | ||
| 4 | American Horror Story: Hotel | 723,745 | The fifth season ofAmerican Horror Story premiered on October 7. The second episode, "Chutes and Ladders", saw a decent-ish 50% drop in views from the premiere. | ||
| 5 | A. P. J. Abdul Kalam | 584,665 | This beloved former scientist and reluctant politician, whose death last July at the age of 83 led to himtopping this list, reappeared on the week of his first post-mortem birthday. | ||
| 6 | Crimson Peak | 580,155 | DirectorGuillermo del Toro's everything-but-the-kitchen-sinkGothic romance has been declared merely "average" by critics, received a withering "B-" from the usually generousCinemascore, and opened to a dead-on-arrival $12 million. Given this, it's interesting that it nonetheless managed to be the most viewed film of the week on Wikipedia—box office numbers have usually proved to be a good indicator of views. Perhaps it was del Toro's nerd-friendly back catalogue, or the presence ofMarvel heartthrobTom Hiddleston. | ||
| 7 | Pablo Escobar | 572,268 | The fascination with theNetflix seriesNarcos continues to keep theCapone ofcocaine near the top of this list. | ||
| 8 | Deaths in 2015 | 538,797 | The viewing figures for this article have been remarkably constant, fluctuating week to week between 450 and 550 thousand on average. The counts are apparently heedless of who actually died. | ||
| 9 | The Martian (film) | 532,484 | The adaptation ofAndy Weir's popular novel about an astronaut stranded onMars (played byMatt Damon) has grossed $319 million worldwide as of October 17 on a budget of $108 million. | ||
| 10 | The Walking Dead (TV series) | 526,852 | The show'ssixth seasonpremièred on October 11. |
I think that the interpretation of Odom is off. I am one of the idiots who looked up the name, not because ofany interest in that marketing sensation, but because I saw news about the person as if it were an issue and didn't know why. If we were clever with feedback, we might be able to come up with awho the hell is XXXX metric to explain the proportion of hits on any given name, though I don't know how...Wnt (talk)12:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]