Privacy policy debate gears up: On September 3, the Wikimedia Foundation launched the second stage of the process to improve the privacy policy implemented on most Wikimedia sites, including Wikipedia and its sister projects, by publishing a policy draft.
On September 3, the Wikimedia Foundation launched the second stage of the process to improve the privacy policy implemented on most Wikimedia sites, including Wikipedia, by publishing apolicy draft.
The first round of deliberations startedin mid-June with an open call for input, but was overshadowed by the PRISM debate. The overall aim is to replace the current, aging policy developed in 2008 by WMF's then-General CounselMike Godwin with one that accounts for changes in the legal and technological environment since then.
The second consultation broadly resembles theTerms of Use update in 2011–12, where more than 120 issues were examined over the course of several months. The legal department only released an English-language draft, while the new privacy policy draft was released in other languages as well: Arabic, French, German, Japanese, and Spanish.
An early controversy was sparked by the attempt—novel in Wikimedia contexts—to use illustrations and jokes as part of the draft in an effort to expand the audience able and willing to read through the legal documents. Geoff Brigham, the foundation's current General Counsel,said in the related Meta debate that early A/B tests displaying the department's mascot,Rory, on banners calling for input indicate a higher click-through rate than for the conventional Foundation logo—including a 9:1 increase on Japanese Wikimedia sites.
The privacy policy draft is the most important part of a series of ongoing and upcoming legal documents to be scrutinized by the community. Alongside the main draft, the WMF has published a proposal for theaccess to non-public information policy, governing rights and duties of CheckUsers, support team members, and others in handling a wide range of issues. Future plans include data retention guidelines; a spelling out of the Foundation's data collection and retention practices under the new privacy policy; and a transparency report disclosing, among other things, how often the Foundation is approached by third parties to hand over user information, the sources of these demands, and how often the foundation complies.
In brief
Article creation bot finishes first run: The Swedish Wikipedia's article-creating program,Lsjbot, hasfinished creating articles on the world's known animals and insects, and is nearly finished with the approximately 50,000 lakes in Sweden (see previousSignpostcoverage). The bot's efforts have pushed the Swedes intofourth place when the various Wikipedias are compared by their total number of articles. The bot's operator is now planning to create articles on a large number of plants before adding the accumulated information to Wikidata. In unrelated but similar news, the Polish Wikipedia will soon pass one million total articles.
WP:WMF: A new English Wikipedia page,Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation, has been launched with the aim of educating the English-language community about the Foundation and increasing the potential avenues of communication between the two.
Good Article main page RFC closes: As theSignpost goes to press, a request for comment onwhether to include recently-promoted good articles in the "Did you know?" section on the main page has closed, with broad consensus to include them. The change is expected to take place in two weeks.
Wikipedia Weekly: A new edition of theWikipedia Weekly podcast has beenpublished.
Israeli image donation: The National Library of Israel has donatedone hundred images related toOperation Horev, a military attack carried out during the country's1948 war.
Wikimedian-in-Residence needed: In a partnership withWikimedia UK, the York Museums Trust islooking for a Wikimedian-in-Residence who can "help improve online access to our extensive collections and disseminate information about our collections, buildings and gardens to the widest possible audience." In particular, the museum appears to want to focus on itsTempest Andersoncollection, who according to his Wikipedia stub was a British surgeon who traveled around the world to investigate the aftermaths of a pair of volcano explosions on different Caribbean islands. The position will run for six months and requires a commitment of two days per week.
Foundation positions: The Wikimedia Foundation is currently looking forsoftware engineers for languages, fundraising, multimedia, and editor-engagement (either in San Francisco or remote worldwide), plus a handful of other development/ops/fundraising posts and alegal intern for next spring, a possible opportunity for a young Wikipedian looking for practical experience.
Open Knowledge Foundation and GLAMs: The Open Knowledge Foundation isseeking an OpenGLAM Community Manager. GLAMs, a frequently used term on Wikipedia, refer togalleries, libraries, archives, and museums. This position would be a part-time (20 hours per week) paid position that would help the organization "build our growing network of cultural heritage professionals, researchers and hackers working to open up data and content" from GLAMs around the world and place it on the Internet, where a significantly greater amount of people can view, learn, and benefit from it.
Help theSignpost: As a general reminder, theSignpost greatly welcomes tips for news, whether they are from outside press sources, within the Wikimedia movement, or tangentially related, on our publicsuggestions page or privately throughemailing the editor-in-chief. While not all suggestions will make it into each week's edition, we do our best to include all that we possibly can.
Not only is Swedish Wikipedia now overflowing with hundreds of thousands of stubs based on outdated taxonomic information, but all of this outdated information is now being copied en masse to other language wikis and Wikidata, from which it will eventually work its way to English Wikipedia, polluting our hand-built mostly-up-to-date taxonomic data with boatloads of crap.
First rule of article creation bots: Never build article creation bots.
Second rule of article creation bots: If you're going to build articles based on 3rd party databases, only use the most specific, specialized, up-to-date databases possible, not huge, generalized databases that don't bother to keep their data up-to-date.
As an active Wikidata user, I'm always highly concerned with the prospect of bad information coming over to Wikidata. Where is the bot operator's plan for Wikidata published?SvenManguardWha?04:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree completely. Even with all the resources of English Wikipedia, we have hundreds of thousands of poorly maintained and poorly watched articles that were created either by bots, or by users in systematic ways. A smaller wiki has no chance of maintaining hundreds of thousands of micro-stubs. I think the root of the problem is inherent or assumed notability for certain classes of things, but as long as we have the flawed notability standards, we need to at least use discretion in proliferating these articles, with a mind for the resources required to maintain them as thousands of microstubs vs fewer summary style articles.Gigs (talk)15:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
But, in defense of the swedes, their swedish-lakes-project is a rather good example for bot-generation of articles: Take several reliable sources, prepare, get consensus and generate articles that people can add to, more text and photos.
And i really likethis: "Our next initiative we are working with is to get all data of Swedish communes, cities and towns 100 % correct in Wikidata (and also a semiautomatic update link to Wikidata from the Swedish statistical authorities databases). We thought our articles on these subjects were fine, but find we need to put in 6-9 month time to get the data from fine to 100% correct, and all the relevant data elements in place in Wikidata even if it only a few thousand articles . When we are ready we will have all the base data for these entities taken from Wikidata (not giving much improvement) but more important we will be able to provide 100% quality data for other language versions to semiautomatic get data (or generate articles) of these subjects, where we feel a special responsibility to secure global quality for." If other projects take the same initiative for polish, french, german,... communes, cities and towns, that would be a huge step for wikidata! --Atlasowa (talk)08:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
