Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/News and notes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost |2012-01-09
News and notes

Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang

Fundraiser 2011 concludes, shatters records, obsoletes blink tag jokes

The Wikimedia Foundation is the only leading online entity to sustain itself entirely on donations. The Foundation's annual fundraiser is its biggest single source of income, having grown with the project since early efforts from2004 and 2003. This year, a goal of $20M was set (up from $16M last year), making up the bulk of the Foundation's $28.3M2011–12 budget.

As with last year's drive, this year's event kicked off withJimbo Wales' "personal appeal", which consistently received the highest feedback in previous drives and it has again this year (see previousSignpost coverage), with a new green banner curiously gathering increased contributions. The appeals featured then shifted their focus to the community, turning the spotlight on appeals from individual Wikimedians over the past few weeks.

That effortconcluded successfully this week, with the $20M goalreached on 2 January 2012. According to Sue Gardner, who graced the CentralNotice banner for some time following the windfall, "Ordinary people use Wikipedia and they like it, so they chip in some cash so it will continue to thrive. That maintains our independence and lets us focus solely on providing a useful public service ... I promise them we will use their money carefully and well."

Although the average donor contribution has remained steady, the number of contributors has been rapidly expanding, increasing ten-fold since 2008.

What will the money be spent on? The2011–12 annual financial plan outlines operating costs through mid-2012, with $12.4M (44%) going to tech support, $6.9M (24%) to finance and administration, $6.5M (23%) to special programs, $2.2M (8%) to fundraising, and $300K (1%) to governance.


The Sakha Wikipedia reaches 8,000 articles after a successful publicity campaign

TheSakha language Wikipedia reached the 8,000-article mark three minutes before the New Year, at the conclusion of a "Marathon 8,000", announced just two days before the year ended. At the time, the wiki needed just 102 articles to achieve this milestone; nonetheless, organizers stressed quality over quantity in the drive, and aimed to attract the Sakha-speaking community to contribute to the Sakha Wikipedia, one of the few international projects that supports the Sakha language online. Despite the short timeframe, Marathon 8,000 proved successful, with a sum total of 109 new articles written within two days.

Anostrog in the city ofYakutsk, the capital of theSakha Republic - an autonomous region in the North-East of Russia and thelargest sub-national entity in the world.

The Sakha Wikipedia's Bureaucrat, Nikolai Pavlov, advertised the campaign in his and his friends' blogs and in announcements in the forums onYkt.ru, the most popular news and forums portal ofYakutsk, the capital of theSakha Republic. In the announcements he appealed to regular Sakha-speaking web surfers and called them to join Wikipedia in their language and to get their children to write, too. Surprisingly, just a few hours after publishing, the moderator of the forums removed the notices as inappropriate, putting the whole campaign in danger. The posts were restored after a personal request from the organizers; Pavlov said that he is sure that this was not an intentional disruption, but a misunderstanding and that he is confident that Ykt.ru will keep supporting the project, as it has done since its first steps.

The response to the campaign was immediate: dozens of editors, many of whom had never edited Wikipedia before, created new articles. The 8,000th article was about Mylajyn (Мылаадьын), a Sakha soldier in theRussian Civil War. Another marker of the campaign's success was that 1 and 2 January saw 20 new articles created by the new writers, an increase from normal levels and an "aftershock" of the campaign.

According to the Marathon's rules, the three winners are awarded an honorary title (in Sakha, "Марафон 8000 кыайыылааҕа"), and are entitled to display a badge on their user page as well as a framed certificate and a prize. The final results of the contest will be announced by 14 January.

Wikimedia UK hosts OTRS workshop

Wikimedia UK hosted a workshop this past weekend for WikimediaOTRS volunteers which was attended by a number of active OTRS agents and one OTRS admin. OTRS volunteers handle e-mails sent to the various e-mail addresses for different Wikimedia projects, and their work includes answering questions and concerns from readers,BLP issues, complaints about copyright and permissions to reuse images and text. At the event, a variety of issues with the current OTRS setup were discussed including how to improve governance of the OTRS system, improving the somewhat infuriating interface, recruiting more active Wikimedians to participate in OTRS, and better handling of difficult or angry people e-mailing the community.

Difficulties faced by OTRS users include handling cross-wiki issues like notability or BLP policies on different language versions of Wikipedia and explaining international copyright policies to correspondents. Better training and mentoring of OTRS volunteers is something that people at the workshop have committed to, as well as considering how practical it would be to try to institute a requirement that e-mails be responded to in under seven days.

U.S. National Archives ExtravaSCANza!

Wikimedians scanning photos on Saturday, January 7 for the ExtravaSCANza

The U.S.National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) hosted a dozen Wikimedians this past week for aNARA ExtravaSCANza at their College Park, Maryland facility. The ExtravaSCANza was organized byDominic McDevitt-Parks, the National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, culminating his 8-month stint at NARA.

In the evening on Wednesday, January 4, Wikimedians scannedNASA photos. The focus on Thursday was women’s suffrage and rights. On Friday and Saturday, Wikimedians worked on photos of Chile, along with battleship photos on Saturday. Wikimedians also helped out with theFedFlix project, digitizing videos, and experimenting with sound recordings. Highlights includeradio broadcasts that encouraged Americans to answer questions from census-takers for the1940 United States Census. Photos are being uploaded toWikimedia Commons, and help is needed to categorize them.

Although NARA will be without a Wikipedian-in-Residence in the months ahead, collaborations will continue, including more scan-a-thon events.

Brief notes

  • In Memoriam: Dutch Wikipedians have marked the passage ofGerardusS, whose death was announced on histalk page. Gerard was noted for his ability to motivate others to write about art and photography; he suffered from severe migraines, and editing Wikipedia gave him the ability to cope with his condition. Gerard made more than 45,000 edits to Wikimedia Commons alone, and wrote more than 1100 articles on sculptors in several languages. For more information on his work, see hisDutch Wikipedia user page.
  • Wikimedia New York City: The U.S.Internal Revenue Service has officially determined theWikimedia New York City chapter to be a non-profit 501(c)(3) charity. The determination letter, dated December 22, 2011, grants tax exemption effective retroactively back to July 7, 2009, which is when the chapter was officially established. Wikimedia New York City acceptstax-deductible donations online via PayPal and also acceptsBitcoins.
  • The Spanish Report:Wikimedia España has published its October–Decemberchapter report, outlining the charter's activities over the last three months.
  • Now we're talking: After an RfC held on thevillage pump, the "Discussion" tab has now changed to "Talk", one of the reasons being that "Talk" would be much easier for new editors to find when directed by others to go to the "talk page".
  • Project milestones: This week, theItalian Wikipedia reached 50,000,000 page edits, theLithuanian Wiktionary reached 600,000 articles, theMalagasy Wikipedia has reached 30,000 articles, and theMarathi Wikipedia reached 100,000 total pages.
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automaticallytranscluded from this article'stalk page. To follow comments,add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can trypurging the cache.

At the risk of ruining a good story, there was no <blink> tag involved. It's a JavaScript fader that was used in the last hours of the campaign. See the source and previewhere. It's also not the case that this was the first use of such a fader, in spite ofgeni's beliefs. It was first used in the 2010 campaign, for the same short period at the end of the campaign.[1] --Eloquence*06:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Implementation method wasn't what was raising objections, implementation itself was. I think that the concerns raised are valid.SvenManguardWha?16:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the false claim from the story. Please do not report jokes as facts.Kaldari (talk)17:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I wish you hadn't removed that link tothis discussion. After the bit about blink tags, individuals contributing to that thread raised some issues about the philosophy behind the fundraising which I believe more than a few Wikipedians would be sympathetic to, namely that it appears the annual fundraising is no longer simply about keeping the servers running & maintaining the Wikimedia software, but to fund other goals which may be a surprise to Wikipedians, & aren't mentioned in the fundraising advertisements. Maybe those additional goals are important enough to justify funding; I'm not going to opine about that. However, considering that the people who raised those concerns are long-term Wikipedians, & are usually supportive of the project, that suggests there is a lack of communication between the WMF staff & many Wikipedians. A lack of communication that may have a relationship to the editor recruitment/retention problem we all know about. --llywrch (talk)17:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Sven. Of course I agree it's a valid concern. However, each of those decisions is a judgment call on the part of the fundraising team, and I think in the case of raising visibility a little bit at the year-end spike in giving is a reasonable one. Moreover, I don't think it's fair to construct or imply a narrative of "the WMF fundraiser is getting more aggressive every year", as the thread on the mailing list did. The 2011 fundraiser was in many ways materially less aggressive than the 2010 campaign (fewer fundraising days, banners disabled after donating, shorter banner period for logged in users, no use of the word "urgent" in the year-end appeal banner, fewer days where Jimmy stares at you as opposed to other messages).--Eloquence*17:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also the following statement in the article isn't accurate: "Although the average donor contribution has remained steady". The average donor contribution was significantly less this year due to more contributions from outside the U.S. and Europe. See the averages tab athttp://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Special:FundraiserStatistics.Kaldari (talk)18:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe average by region remained steady?Rich Farmbrough,12:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Strange, I remember reading somewhere that the amounts stayed the same but the numbers have been ballooning...ResMar22:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Get the latest headlines on your user page – just add{{Signpost-subscription}}.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-01-09/News_and_notes&oldid=1193868513"
Category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp