Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:WikiProject Museums
Main pageAssessmentGuidelineMembersPopular PagesProgressRequested ArticlesRequests for ExpansionTemplatesWorking with Museums

This is the assessment department of WikiProject Museums.

Below is a bot generated table of the assessment process of WikiProject Museums supported articles. The stats are generated automatically every 2-3 days, but they can be updated manually by enteringMuseums (and replacingFoobar) into the Category boxhere. These statistics are based on how articles are categorized by{{WikiProject Museums}} - for full information on how to use the template, see the documentation on that page.


Museums articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
FA352129
FL235
A11
GA1716995128
B122269244220567
C11702711,3929082,652
Start8824205,1933,2818,984
Stub2181403,63313,3007,094
List215502595417748
NA23516212,04712,219
Assessed3822097911,00612,0538,13132,427
Unassessed189
Total3822097911,00712,0538,13932,436
WikiWork factors (?)ω =100,009Ω = 5.14


The above table shows the current state of this WikiProject. To view historical, monthly totals, seeproject progress.

Quality

[edit]

Once they havethis talk page template they need to be assessed using the criteria atWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment to get the class FA, A, GA, B, Start and Stub. Then this can be added to the talk page template by adding|class =level. This will make them appear in the relevant categories.Museum article guidelines.

Quality scale

[edit]
Article progress grading scheme[ ]
LabelCriteriaReader's experienceEditor's experienceExample
FA
{{FA-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet thecurrent criteria for featured articles.Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible.Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
FL
{{FL-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet thecurrent criteria for featured lists.Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information.No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible.FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described inHow to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered forfeatured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work.Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.Durian (as of March 2007)
GA
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through theGood article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting thegood article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, buthaving completed theGood article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fullywikified, now is the time.International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}
Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually amajority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright,Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) orNo Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet theGood article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for whichcleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
C
{{C-Class}}
Needs Criteria DescriptionNeeds Reader Experience DescriptionNeeds Editor Experience DescriptionInsert Example Here
Start
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including anyone of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an articlecleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.Any editing or additional material can be helpful.Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

Importance

[edit]

This page is a guide to assessing the importance levels of articles that are maintained byWikiProject Museums. There are four levels of importance that give an indication as to the priority of articles tothis WikiProject, as opposed to Wikipedia as a whole.

The importance levels areTop,High,Mid andLow, and are assigned by adding|importance =level to the{{WikiProject Museums}} template on the article's talk page. A guide to the type of articles that should be placed in each category is given below, but these are not hard and fast rules. Any individual article should be assessed on its own merits. If you are unable to decide which importance level to use, please go to theWP:Museums talk page and leave a message there.

Remember:

  • Anyone can assess the class or importance of an article, you don't need special permission to do it.
  • If you feel that an article has been assessed wrongly, feel free to change it.
  • Any problems or questions should be left at theWP:Museums talk page, as that is monitored by more people that the talk page here.

Importance scale

[edit]
ImportanceType of articleExamplesNotes
TopArticles that are central toWikiProject MuseumsMuseum
List of museums
?
Very few articles should be in this category
HighNational Museums
Types of Museums
International Museum Organisations
National Museum of Australia
Maritime museum
International Council of Museums
?
MidMajor Museums of specific types
Well known Museums
?
?
?
National Museum of American Jewish History
Roman Baths (Bath)
United States Capitol Visitor Center
Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum
?
LowLocal Museums
Very specialist interests
Miscellaneous articles
Radstock Museum
Lambretta Scooter Museum
20 GOTO 10
?
The majority of articles will be in this category

Log

[edit]

November 28, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

November 27, 2025

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

November 26, 2025

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

November 25, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

November 24, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • Convent Gallery (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed fromStub-Class toStart-Class.(rev ·t) Importance rating changed fromUnknown-Class toLow-Class.(rev ·t)

Assessed

[edit]

November 23, 2025

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

November 22, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
  • Mark Stout (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed fromUnassessed-Class toStub-Class.(rev ·t)

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Museums/Assessment&oldid=1291719106"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp