Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender studies/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
<Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender studies
Gender studies articles by quality and importance
QualityImportance
TopHighMidLowNA???Total
FA126312
FL22
A112
GA61433356
B2039143214103519
C27722794963071,181
Start53012169716401,494
Stub19193196399
List7127727123
NA36141,5151,538
Assessed531605841,7311,5161,2825,326
Unassessed17576
Total531605841,7321,5161,3575,402
WikiWork factors (?)ω =16,259Ω = 4.44
Project
Gender studies
Project page
Talk page
Notice Board
Translation
Assessment
Popular pages
Templates
Collaboration
Deletion sorting
WikiProject Feminism
Portal:Feminism
Category:WikiProject Gender studies

One of the proposed tasks ofProject Gender studies is to assess the quality of Wikipedia's Gender studies articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to help in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. This plays a role in theWP:1.0 program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the{{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories ofCategory:Gender studies articles by quality andCategory:Gender studies articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for anautomatically generated worklist.

How to Assess

[edit]

An article's quality assessment is recorded using the|class= parameter in the {{WikiProject banner shell}}. Articles that have the{{WikiProject Gender studies}} banner template on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.

The following standard grades may be used to describe the quality of mainspace articles (seeWikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA(forfeatured articlesonly; adds them to theFA-Class Gender studies articles category) FA
FL(forfeatured listsonly; adds them to theFL-Class Gender studies articles category) FL
A(for articles that passed a formalpeer reviewonly; adds them to theA-Class Gender studies articles category) A
GA(forgood articlesonly; adds them to theGA-Class Gender studies articles category) GA
B(for articles that satisfy all of theB-Class criteria; adds them to theB-Class Gender studies articles category)B
C(for substantial articles; adds them to theC-Class Gender studies articles category)C
Start(for developing articles; adds them to theStart-Class Gender studies articles category)Start
Stub(for basic articles; adds them to theStub-Class Gender studies articles category)Stub
List(forstand-alone lists; adds them to theList-Class Gender studies articles category)List
NA(for any other pages where assessment is unwarranted; adds them to theNA-Class Gender studies pages category)NA
???(articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in theUnassessed Gender studies articles category)???

Discussing / Disputing ratings

[edit]

Please use this subpage'stalk page to question and/or discuss article ratings.

Quality scale

[edit]

It is suggested that Project Gender studies use the same criteria for grading articles as set out by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as set out below.

WikiProject content quality grading scheme
ClassCriteriaReader's experienceEditing suggestionsExample
 FAThe article has attainedfeatured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers fromWP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets thefeatured article criteria:

Afeatured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting thepolicies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims areverifiable against high-qualityreliable sources and are supported by inline citationswhere appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents viewsfairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoingedit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant withWikipedia's copyright policy and free ofplagiarism ortoo-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows thestyle guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a conciselead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchicalsection headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—seeciting sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It hasimages and other media, where appropriate, with succinctcaptions andacceptable copyright status. Images follow theimage use policy.Non-free images or media must satisfy thecriteria for inclusion of non-free content andbe labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and usessummary style where appropriate.
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.Fight Club
 FLThe article has attainedfeatured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers fromWP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets thefeatured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaginglead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful,section headings andtable sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with theManual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoingedit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.List of female Nobel laureates
 AThe article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets theA-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described inWikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as afeatured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g.WikiProject Military history).
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving.WP:Peer review may help.Womanism
 GAThe article meetsall of thegood article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers fromWP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
Agood article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, andunderstandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with theManual of Style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation.
  2. Verifiable withno original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources arecited inline. All content thatcould reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it containsno original research; and
    4. it contains nocopyright violations orplagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses themain aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, bymedia such asimages,video, oraudio:
    1. media aretagged with theircopyright statuses, andvalid non-free use rationales are provided fornon-free content; and
    2. media arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions.
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existingfeatured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.Feminism
BThe article meetsall of theB-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reachgood article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article issuitably referenced, withinline citations. It hasreliable sources, and any important or controversial material which islikely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of<ref> tags andcitation templates such as{{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for anA-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including alead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to beof the standard of featured articles. TheManual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, aninfobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in anappropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background andtechnical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with theManual of Style and relatedstyle guidelines.Gender typing
CThe article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantialcleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solvecleanup problems.Coloniality of gender
StartAn article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.Providing references toreliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Improve the grammar, spelling, and writing style; decrease the use of jargon.Birth name
StubA very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.Gender empowerment
ListMeets the criteria of astand-alone list orset index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.List of female scientists in the 21st century
NAAny non-article page that fits no other classification.The page contains no article content.Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.Category:WikiProject Gender studies
???Article quality has not yet been assessed.Articles for which a valid quality rating has not yet been provided are listed in this category.A quality parameter should be assigned according to the assessment department of the WikiProject.seeCategory:Unassessed Gender studies articles

Importance assessment

[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from theimportance parameter in the{{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for theimportance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (seeWikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles toCategory:Top-importance Gender studies articles) Top 
High (adds articles toCategory:High-importance Gender studies articles) High 
Mid (adds articles toCategory:Mid-importance Gender studies articles) Mid 
Low (adds articles toCategory:Low-importance Gender studies articles) Low 
NA (adds articles toCategory:NA-importance Gender studies articles) NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed inCategory:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles) ??? 

Importance scale

[edit]
WikiProject article importance scheme
ImportanceCriteriaExample
 Top Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field.Feminism
 High Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent.Queer theory
 Mid Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area.Girly girl
 Low Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article.Bachelor party
 NA Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc.Category:WikiProject Gender studies
 ??? Subject importance has not yet been assessed.seeCategory:Unknown-importance Gender studies articles

Popular pages

[edit]

The results of the assessment combined with information ontraffic statistics for pages producesthis list.

Assessment log

[edit]
Assessment log

July 16, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

July 15, 2025

[edit]

Renamed

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]

Assessed

[edit]

Removed

[edit]

July 11, 2025

[edit]

Reassessed

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gender_studies/Assessment&oldid=1067325587"
Categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp