WikiProject Fishes aims to help organise our rapidly growing collection of articles aboutfishtaxa. Issues outside the scope of this WikiProject include fishkeeping (fishaquarium topics), fishing, fisheries, fish cuisine topics, fish farm topics, fish market topics, fish processing topics, fish product sales topics, fish products topics, and fish trap topics.
At the end of October 2021, there were33,888 articles within the project's scope. During October 2021, the most popular 500 articles received7,931,480 views, averaging 255,854 views per day.
HolyCrocsEmperor (talk·contribs) Hiii I just created articles for mostgrayling species and now start working on other freshwater species in Russia and East Asia! Have a good day!
MChGilbert (talk·contribs) Fish biologist/anatomist studying a variety of fish taxa, from pupfishes to cichlids to bramids. Editing when I have the time.
KokiHaps (talk·contribs) I am active in the German Wikipedia section as well as in Wikispecies under the Username 'Haps' (which is in other Wikipedia languages unfortunately occupied by other users)
Kyknos (talk·contribs) - mainly focused on labyrinth fishes, snakeheads, blackwater species and fishkeeping in general
Palaxzorodice (talk·contribs) Betta fish lover, mostly contribute on Betta-related articles, aim to improve Betta articles to be good or featured articles.
Sablegsd (talk·contribs) I am passionate aboutHydrocynus and take an intense personal interest in that genus and the five species contained therein. As of the time of this writing, I own two species.
TheLastClassicist1750 (talk·contribs) I am interested in all fish, and I hope to help out here mostly through copy-editing and other small contributions.
TheOrangeOctopus (talk·contribs) Hello! I love marine biology, and although my passion is cephalopods, I would like to help edit fish pages!
If a family has only a single genus, the family name should redirect to the article on the genus (e.g.,Elassomatidae). If a genus has only a single species, articles using the common name should redirect to the species (e.g.,Centrarchus), whereas articles using the binomial should redirect to the genus (e.g.,Boesemania microlepis). Exceptions are also made for articles where the genus name has a disambiguator in parentheses (e.g.,Bullockia (fish)).
When a genus contains only a small number of similar species, the articles may be combined with the article on the genus (e.g.,Crappie, which includes the white crappie,Pomoxis annularis, and the black crappie,P. nigromaculatus.)
Common names should be written in sentence case rather than title case, following normal English usage and that ofFishBase. Use, for example, "largemouth bass", not "Largemouth Bass". Place names or personal names that form part of a common name remain capitalized, hence "Guadalupe bass" (in reference to theGuadalupe River) or "White Cloud Mountain minnow" (in reference toWhite Cloud Mountain in China).
Use the common name for any species that satisfies at least one of the following criteria:
1(i) The species has a single common name that is widely used and never used for any other species. While the species in question may have additional common names, those names are rarely used. Example:Greenland halibut.
1(ii) The species has a widely recognised common name that is so rarely applied to other species that confusion as to the subject of the article is unlikely to arise. Example:Guppy.
1(iii) Within the area where the species is endemic and/or of commercial importance, only a single common name is used by the relevant legal, conservation, fisheries or local institutions, even though other common names may exist. Example:Atlantic salmon.
1(iv) The species has a common name that is normally separated from similar common names by use of geographical, descriptive, or other modifications to those names. Once differentiated, these names satisfy criteria i, ii, or iii above. Examples:Shovelnose sturgeon,Little shovelnose sturgeon,False shovelnose sturgeon.
Use the Latin name for any species that fails to satisfy criteria 1(i) to 1(iv), including such situations as the following:
2(i) The same common name is regularly applied to multiple species. Example:Green spotted puffer.
2(iii) The species has different common names in different English-speaking countries. Example:Plec (UK),pleco (US).
2(iv) The species simply has no widely used common name. Example:Dermogenys sumatrana.
Guidelines
Regardless of the title used, articles should include the scientific name in bold and italics and all significant English common names in bold in the first paragraph (and preferably the first sentence).
The first paragraph should differentiate the fish from other species with which it might be confused. This may be done by explaining the ambiguity, with links to other fish (e.g., attilapia), or by mentioning geographical distribution, for example:
Theguppy (Poecilia reticulata), also known as themillionsfish, is a small fresh and brackish water fish from Central America.
This article is about the <put text>; for the <put text> see <put link>.
Create adisambiguation page when the ambiguity involves many fish and a hatnote would be too long. Example:Tigerfish.
Before renaming articles, discuss the reasons for doing so on the Talk page. In cases of disputed naming, where aconsensus cannot be reached on the article's Talk page, the matter should be discussed at WikiProject Fishes to allow a consensus decision to be reached.
Regional lists of species
Lists of fish species should follow the form:List of fishes of <Region>. The definite article may be needed for the name of some regions. Note that "List of fish of ..." is incorrect when dealing with a list of the species.
Articles on taxa above species should be titled using the common name, if one exists and is unambiguous. Otherwise, the scientific epithet should be used. When FishBase or other references give a common name of "xes andys" or "xes orys" for a higher taxon, the scientific epithet (possibly anglicized) should be used for the article title.
Articles on taxa above the generic level should be titled with the Latin form of the name and not the anglicization, e.g.Cyprinidae notcyprinid, andPerciformes notperciform. The anglicizations may be freely used in article text however.
For extinct taxa, i,e, where that taxon is not included in Ecof, and for levels above that of order then editors should follow the the 5th edition ofFishes of the World. For example the for theplacoderms we would followFishes of the World but for the genusJefitchia, a sciaenid, we would use Ecof's taxonomy because that taxon is within an extant lineage. Editors should have access to a full copy of the 5th edition of Catalog of Fishes in the Wikipedia Libraryhttps://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/doi/book/10.1002/9781119174844 . If the FotW taxonomy is shown to be outdated or contrary to the current expert consensus in recent scientific papers, alternative schemes may be followed instead.
The taxonomy template should be referenced to Ecof for taxa at and below the level of order, and toFishes of the World 5th ed for taxa above the level of order.
Note: When listing the species authority (the author(s) who originally named the species or subspecies of interest), in the taxobox or elsewhere, parentheses matter. For example, "Foogenus fishii Smith, 1900" has a subtly different meaning than "Foogenus fishii (Smith, 1900)". Parentheses indicate that Smith originally placedfishii in a different genus, and the species was subsequently placed inFoogenus. See more atBinomial nomenclature andTemplate:Taxobox#Authorities (Animalia usage).
Wikipedia categories should be created for well-known families, using the plural of the common name of the family (Category:Centrarchidae orCategory:Cyprinidae), and for orders, using the common name (e.g.,Category:Catfishes) or the scientific epithet (e.g.,Category:Cyprinodontiformes). For very small families (e.g., thepygmy sunfishes), only the order category may be used, but usage must be consistent among members of a family.
All articles on taxa should have taxoboxes (constructed using the taxobox templates, not built from scratch) including kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. SeeWikipedia:Automated taxobox system for the full details of taxobox construction.
An example taxobox, for thewarmouth (Lepomis gulosus), is given at right.
An image should be included in the taxobox if an appropriate one is available.
Higher taxa should use images reflecting their types, if possible. For example,Lepomis uses an image ofL. auritus, theredbreast sunfish, which is thetype species of the genus, whileCentrarchidae uses an image ofCentrarchus macropterus, theflier, which is the type (and only) species ofCentrarchus, the type genus of Centrarchidae.
The taxobox image should ideally picture a single fish, facing left, in a horizontal orientation, cropped to 20 percent of the fish's length around the fish's body, and should be 250 pixels wide. (The image should not be resized manually; the full-size image should be uploaded and markup used to create the 250px image. Note that very large images may be resized before upload so that they will fit in a normal browser window when enlarged.) For articles long enough to warrant inclusion of additional images, these may be placed as thumbnails in the article body, ideally showing the fish in its native environment.
Note that images of fishes which do not possess right-left symmetry should not be flipped to obtain a left-facing fish; doing so would, for example, convert arighteye flounder into alefteye flounder.
Text captions should not be used on taxobox images in species articles, but in articles on higher taxa, the article caption should indicate the species pictured (if known), in the format "[[Common name]] (''Genus species'')". If the species depicted is not known, the caption should identify the fish as closely as possible, as in "Pygmy sunfish (Elassoma sp.)"
A example size comparison of awhale shark and a human
It is always beneficial to have a picture that communicates a sense of scale. This can be achieved by
placing standard sized physical objects next to the fish (human hand or body, tape measure, etc.), before taking the photo. Sometimes the background scenery will already do the job.
painting a measuring scale into an existing image, if you know its exact scale (that's not the same as knowing the average size of the species, btw).
painting a reference shape (human silhouette, etc.) into the picture, if your idea about the scale is less accurate.
painting a measuring scale is highly unscientific if it is based on nothing but a guess. In this case you should use the image as it is!
Anyway, any image is better than no image - esp. if you have only third party material available, or if you don't want to get the animal out of its living environment.
The first paragraph should give the common and systematic names of the taxon featured in the article, as well as some information about its classification. Species articles should follow the form:
Succeeding paragraphs should give, in order (omitting paragraphs for which no information is available):
Taxonomy (includes classification, evolution, subspecies, etymology of name (especially for genus names, which FishBase normally provides), alternate common names, important binomial synonyms, etc.
Description, including size, weight, and age data from FishBase
Distribution and habitat
Feeding, diet, and related information
Reproduction (life-cycle, breeding, etc.)
Importance to humans (aquarium fish, game fish, commercial fishing, research uses, etc.)
Conservation status (if not Secure) for species, including explanation for the classification, and mention of members classified as Vulnerable or worse for higher taxa
Trivia (state fish, national emblem, ships bearing the name, other uses of the name, etc.)
Information on keeping fish in an aquarium should be put in a section entitled "In the aquarium". Breeding and dietary information pertaining to captive fish should go here, rather than in the main section, which should refer primarily to the fish in its natural habitat.
Other sections may address topics of interest warranting discussion longer than a brief paragraph.
Every article should include a section entitled "References", with a bullet-list of sources. Every article should include a citation there of the relevant entries inFishBase and, if possible,ITIS. It is not necessary to includeFishes of the World unless it has been used as a source for the article. Other sources for information in the article should be included, following normal citation format.
Templates exist for citing FishBase and ITIS, and these should be used.
{{FishBase order | order = Bariformes | year = YYYY | month = Month}}
For a FishBase entry on a family, use:
{{FishBase family | family = Baridae | year = YYYY | month = Month}}
For a FishBase entry on a genus, use:
{{FishBase genus | genus = Barus | year = YYYY | month = Month}}
For most FishBase entries on species, use:
{{FishBase species | genus = Barus | species = foous | year = YYYY | month = Month}}
For most FishBase entries on subspecies, use:
{{FishBase subspecies | genus = Barus | species = foous | subspecies = subfoous | year = YYYY | month = Month}}
For FishBase entries that are problematic for the above templates, get the numeric ID from their URL and use:
{{FishBase species alt | ID = ???? | taxon = Barus foous foous | year = YYYY | month = Month}}
For all FishBase templates,year andmonth refer to the FishBase revision consulted,not the date on which you consulted FishBase; the revision can be found from theFishBase home page.
{{ITIS | ID = ????? | taxon = ''Barus foous'' | year = YYYY | date = DD Month}}
For the ITIS template,year anddate refer to the date on which ITIS was consulted. Date can be in either U.S. or international format, as it will be wikified.
Web sites or pages not used as sources for the article (except for FishBase and ITIS) should appear in a section entitled "External links" (using the plural even if only one link is present).
WikiProject Fishes' project banner is{{WikiProject Fishes}}. Please place at the top of an appropriate talk page. Placing the template on the talk page will help to direct editors to this WikiProject Fishes main page. This is how the template will look when it has been added:
This article is part ofWikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related toFish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further atWikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of theWikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes
Remember to mark up stub articles with the appropriate stub template at the bottom of the article. This automatically adds it to the appropriate page and inserts the banners to the bottom of the page. These are the current stub templates:
Please make sure to add articles to the appropriate categories among the ones listed onWikipedia:WikiProject Fishes/Categories. If there are any categories that you think should be created, please request them in the tasklist on this page or on thetalk page.
I originally nominated the article for deletion as original research. There seems to be some confusion with this article about whether it represents a distinct species and whether it's actually been scientifically described. It's been improved, but it'd be great if an expert wouldcomment on the AfD, improve the article, or otherwise help us figure this one out.Graymornings(talk)11:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is a list of recognized content, updated weekly byJL-Bot (talk·contribs) (typically on Saturdays). There is no need to edit the list yourself. If an article is missing from the list, make sure it istagged (e.g.{{WikiProject Fishes}}) orcategorized correctly and wait for the next update. SeeWP:RECOG for configuration options.